Altova Mailing List Archives>Archive Index >xml-dev Archive Home >Recent entries >Thread Prev - >Thread Next - Re: [xml-dev] The triples datamodel -- was Re: [xml-dev] Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1 RE: [xml-dev] Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1 (was Re: [xml-dev] InfoWorld agrees with Elliote Rusty Harold)To: "Elliotte Rusty Harold" <elharo@-------.---.--->,"Michael Champion" <mc@-------.---> Date: 6/3/2004 8:21:00 PM > The basic idea of RDF that seems useful is naming things with > standard URIs. However, I simply don't see how the RDF syntax Actually, I agree with you. The official syntax is lame, but the fundamental concept of naming things with URIs is the key. The value of RDF is the data model; not the serialization syntax. > improves on XML+namespaces for that, and XML+namespaces is so > much nicer a syntax than RDF. Well, the big difference is that RDF is a "triples" data model, while XML is hierarchy. Setting aside the issues of how you *serialize* the triples, it's inevitable that "triples" will win in these "semantic" scenarios. OSAF Chandler is based on "triples", as is Longhorn's WinFS. Both are essentially "personal semantic web stores". Triples+URIs is how you bootstrap the "personal semantic web store" and make it universal. For a better syntax, maybe you would like TriX. | ||||||
| Company | Legal | Press | Partners | Careers | Sitemap | Contact Us | Altova Blog | Mobile | Full Site | |||
|
