Home. 
.

transparent

transparent

transparent

Altova Mailing List Archives

xml-dev



[OT] Difference between an extensible versus an evolvable information system? - 6/2/2004 12:28:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] [OT] Difference between an extensible versus an evolvable information system? - 6/2/2004 1:18:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] [OT] Difference between an extensible versus an evolvable information system? - 6/2/2004 2:53:00 PM
[OT] Enhancing the richness of an information system [was: Difference between an extensible versus an evolvable information system?] - 6/2/2004 3:31:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] [OT] Difference between an extensible versus an evolvable information system? - 6/2/2004 4:19:00 PM
healthcare.xml.org - 6/2/2004 5:08:00 PM
[Fwd: RE: [xml-dev] Enhancing the richness of an information system [was: Difference between an extensible versus an evolvable information system?]] - 6/2/2004 5:40:00 PM
RE: [Fwd: RE: [xml-dev] Enhancing the richness of an information system [was: Difference between an extensible versus an evolvable information system?]] - 6/2/2004 5:59:00 PM
Why is it important to distinguish between an extensible versus evolvable information system? - 6/2/2004 6:35:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Why is it important to distinguish between an extensible versus evolvable information system? - 6/2/2004 7:00:00 PM
InfoWorld agrees with Elliote Rusty Harold: W3C XForms The Next Big Thing? - 6/2/2004 8:53:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] InfoWorld agrees with Elliote Rusty Harold: W3C XForms The Next Big Thing? - 6/2/2004 9:07:00 PM
Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1 (was Re: [xml-dev] InfoWorld agrees with Elliote Rusty Harold) - 6/3/2004 2:28:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] InfoWorld agrees with Elliote Rusty Harold: W3C XFo rms The Next Big Thing? - 6/3/2004 1:25:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1 (was Re:[xml-dev] InfoWorld agrees with Elliote Rusty Harold) - 6/3/2004 2:01:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1 (was Re:[xml-dev] InfoWorld agrees with Elliote Rusty Harold) - 6/3/2004 2:02:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1 (was Re: [xml-dev]InfoWorld agrees with Elliote Rusty Harold) - 6/3/2004 6:16:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1 (was Re:[xml-dev] InfoWorld agrees with Elliote Rusty Harold) - 6/3/2004 6:35:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1 (was Re: [xml-dev] InfoWorld agrees with Elliote Rusty Harold) - 6/9/2004 9:30:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1 (was Re: [xml-dev] InfoWorld agrees with Elliote Rusty Harold) - 6/3/2004 4:43:00 AM
An alternative formulation of the document-centric/data-centric XML divide - 6/3/2004 9:58:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] An alternative formulation of thedocument-centric/data-centric XML divide - 6/3/2004 11:55:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] An alternative formulation of the document-centric/data-centric XML divide - 6/3/2004 1:16:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1 (was Re: [xml-dev] InfoWorld agrees with Elliote Rusty Harold) - 6/3/2004 1:27:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1 (was Re: [xml-dev] InfoWorld agrees with Elliote Rusty Harold) - 6/3/2004 1:57:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] InfoWorld agrees with Elliote Rusty Harold: W3C XFo rms The Next Big Thing? - 6/3/2004 2:01:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] An alternative formulation of the document-centric/data-centric XML divide - 6/3/2004 2:02:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1 (was Re: [xml-dev] InfoWorld agrees with Elliote Rusty Harold) - 6/3/2004 2:03:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] An alternative formulation of the document-centric/data-centric XML divide - 6/3/2004 2:03:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1 (was Re: [xml-dev] InfoWorld agrees with Elliote Rusty Harold) - 6/3/2004 2:04:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] [OT] Difference between an extensible versus an ev olvable information system? - 6/3/2004 2:05:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] An alternative formulation of thedocument-centric/data-centric XML divide - 6/3/2004 2:44:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] An alternative formulation of the document-centric/data-centric XML divide - 6/3/2004 2:53:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1 (was Re: [xml-dev] InfoWorld agrees with Elliote Rusty Harold) - 6/3/2004 2:53:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] An alternative formulation of the document-centric/ data-centric XML divide - 6/3/2004 3:20:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1 (was Re: [x ml-dev] InfoWorld agrees with Elliote Rusty Harold) - 6/3/2004 5:03:00 PM
Operational Requirements for Extension and Evolution of an Information System - 6/3/2004 5:46:00 PM
Bruce Perens and yet more patents - 6/3/2004 5:57:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1 (was Re: [xml-dev] InfoWorld agrees with Elliote Rusty Harold) - 6/3/2004 5:59:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1 (was Re: [xml-dev] InfoWorld agrees with Elliote Rusty Harold) - 6/3/2004 6:48:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1 (was Re: [xml-dev] InfoWorld agrees with Elliote Rusty Harold) - 6/3/2004 7:32:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1 (was Re: [xml-dev] InfoWorld agrees with Elliote Rusty Harold) - 6/3/2004 7:48:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1 (was Re: [xml-dev] InfoWorld agrees with Elliote Rusty Harold) - 6/3/2004 7:49:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1 (was Re: [xml-dev] InfoWorld agrees with Elliote Rusty Harold) - 6/3/2004 7:55:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1 (was Re: [xml-dev] InfoWorld agrees with Elliote Rusty Harold) - 6/3/2004 8:11:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1 (was Re: [ xml-dev] InfoWorld agrees with Elliote Rusty Harold) - 6/3/2004 8:17:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1 (was Re: [xml-dev] InfoWorld agrees with Elliote Rusty Harold) - 6/3/2004 8:21:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] The triples datamodel -- was Re: [xml-dev] Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1 - 6/4/2004 1:11:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] The triples datamodel -- was Re: [xml-dev] SemanticWeb permathread, iteration n+1 - 6/4/2004 2:34:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] The triples datamodel -- was Re: [xml-dev] Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1 - 6/4/2004 5:16:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] The triples datamodel -- was Re: [xml-dev] SemanticWeb permathread, iteration n+1 - 6/5/2004 1:02:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] The triples datamodel -- was Re: [xml-dev] SemanticWeb permathread, iteration n+1 - 6/5/2004 10:48:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] The triples datamodel -- was Re: [xml-dev] Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1 - 6/6/2004 8:38:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] The triples datamodel -- was Re: [xml-dev] Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1 - 6/5/2004 11:06:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] The triples datamodel -- was Re: [xml-dev] SemanticWeb permathread, iteration n+1 - 6/5/2004 2:25:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] The triples datamodel -- was Re: [xml-dev] SemanticWeb permathread, iteration n+1 - 6/5/2004 10:01:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] The triples datamodel -- was Re: [xml-dev] SemanticWeb permathread, iteration n+1 - 6/6/2004 8:47:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] The triples datamodel -- was Re: [xml-dev] Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1 - 6/8/2004 10:56:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] The triples datamodel -- was Re: [xml-dev] SemanticWeb permathread, iteration n+1 - 6/10/2004 10:57:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] The triples datamodel -- was Re: [xml-dev] Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1 - 6/6/2004 11:02:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] The triples datamodel -- was Re: [xml-dev] Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1 - 6/6/2004 11:02:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] The triples datamodel -- was Re: [xml-dev] Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1 - 6/6/2004 11:53:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] The triples datamodel -- was Re: [xml-dev] Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1 - 6/6/2004 1:35:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] The triples datamodel -- was Re: [xml-dev] Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1 - 6/8/2004 10:48:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] The triples datamodel -- was Re: [xml-dev] SemanticWeb permathread, iteration n+1 - 6/10/2004 8:48:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] The triples datamodel -- was Re: [xml-dev] Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1 - 6/11/2004 5:08:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] The triples datamodel -- was Re: [xml-dev] Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1 - 6/6/2004 1:54:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] The triples datamodel -- was Re: [xml-dev] Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1 - 6/6/2004 3:08:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] The triples datamodel -- was Re: [xml-dev] Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1 - 6/8/2004 2:04:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] The triples datamodel -- was Re: [xml-dev] Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1 - 6/6/2004 3:53:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] The triples datamodel -- was Re: [xml-dev] Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1 - 6/11/2004 10:53:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] The triples datamodel -- was Re: [xml-dev] SemanticWeb permathread, iteration n+1 - 6/13/2004 9:28:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] The triples datamodel -- was Re: [xml-dev] Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1 - 6/6/2004 5:44:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] The triples datamodel -- was Re: [xml-dev] Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1 - 6/6/2004 6:12:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] The triples datamodel -- was Re: [xml-dev] Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1 - 6/11/2004 5:13:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] The triples datamodel -- was Re: [xml-dev] SemanticWeb permathread, iteration n+1 - 6/13/2004 9:38:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] The triples datamodel -- was Re: [xml-dev] Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1 - 6/6/2004 7:03:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] The triples datamodel -- was Re: [xml-dev] Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1 - 6/6/2004 7:28:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] The triples datamodel -- was Re: [xml-dev] SemanticWeb permathread, iteration n+1 - 6/6/2004 8:02:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] The triples datamodel -- was Re: [xml-dev] SemanticWeb permathread, iteration n+1 - 6/6/2004 8:05:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] The triples datamodel -- was Re: [xml-dev] Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1 - 6/6/2004 8:05:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] The triples datamodel -- was Re: [xml-dev] Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1 - 6/6/2004 8:27:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] The triples datamodel -- was Re: [xml-dev] Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1 - 6/6/2004 10:35:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] The triples datamodel -- was Re: [xml-dev] Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1 - 6/6/2004 8:36:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] The triples datamodel -- was Re: [xml-dev] SemanticWeb permathread, iteration n+1 - 6/6/2004 8:38:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] The triples datamodel -- was Re: [xml-dev] Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1 - 6/6/2004 8:41:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] The triples datamodel -- was Re: [xml-dev] Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1 - 6/7/2004 8:38:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] The triples datamodel -- was Re: [xml-dev] SemanticWeb permathread, iteration n+1 - 6/7/2004 8:54:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] The triples datamodel -- was Re: [xml-dev] SemanticWeb permathread, iteration n+1 - 6/7/2004 9:22:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] The triples datamodel -- was Re: [xml-dev] Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1 - 6/7/2004 11:02:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] The triples datamodel -- was Re: [xml-dev] Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1 - 6/7/2004 11:02:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] The triples datamodel -- was Re: [xml-dev] Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1 - 6/7/2004 11:49:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] The triples datamodel -- was Re: [xml-dev] SemanticWeb permathread, iteration n+1 - 6/8/2004 12:30:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] The triples datamodel -- was Re: [xml-dev] SemanticWeb permathread, iteration n+1 - 6/8/2004 2:59:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] The triples datamodel -- was Re: [xml-dev] SemanticWeb permathread, iteration n+1 - 6/8/2004 4:19:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] The triples datamodel -- was Re: [xml-dev] SemanticWeb permathread, iteration n+1 - 6/8/2004 4:26:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] The triples datamodel -- was Re: [xml-dev] Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1 - 6/8/2004 10:01:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] The triples datamodel -- was Re: [xml-dev] SemanticWeb permathread, iteration n+1 - 6/8/2004 5:08:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] The triples datamodel -- was Re: [xml-dev] SemanticWeb permathread, iteration n+1 - 6/8/2004 5:11:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] The triples datamodel -- was Re: [xml-dev] Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1 - 6/8/2004 5:15:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] The triples datamodel -- was Re: [xml-dev] SemanticWeb permathread, iteration n+1 - 6/8/2004 5:29:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] The triples datamodel -- was Re: [xml-dev] Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1 - 6/8/2004 7:10:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] The triples datamodel -- was Re: [xml-dev] SemanticWeb permathread, iteration n+1 - 6/8/2004 8:09:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] The triples datamodel -- was Re: [xml-dev] SemanticWeb permathread, iteration n+1 - 6/8/2004 9:14:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] The triples datamodel -- was Re: [xml-dev] Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1 - 6/8/2004 9:49:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] The triples datamodel -- was Re: [xml-dev] Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1 - 6/8/2004 12:02:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] The triples datamodel -- was Re: [xml-dev] Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1 - 6/8/2004 12:12:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] The triples datamodel -- was Re: [xml-dev] Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1 - 6/8/2004 1:43:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] The triples datamodel -- was Re: [xml-dev] SemanticWeb permathread, iteration n+1 - 6/8/2004 1:43:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] The triples datamodel -- was Re: [xml-dev] Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1 - 6/8/2004 1:43:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] The triples datamodel -- was Re: [xml-dev] Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1 - 6/8/2004 1:43:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] The triples datamodel -- was Re: [xml-dev] Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1 - 6/8/2004 1:43:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] The triples datamodel -- was Re: [xml-dev] Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1 - 6/8/2004 6:15:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] The triples datamodel -- was Re: [xml-dev] Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1 - 6/8/2004 6:33:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] The triples datamodel -- was Re: [xml-dev] Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1 - 6/8/2004 10:57:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] The triples datamodel -- was Re: [xml-dev] Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1 - 6/11/2004 11:43:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] The triples datamodel -- was Re: [xml-dev] SemanticWeb permathread, iteration n+1 - 6/13/2004 9:20:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] The triples datamodel - 6/8/2004 6:10:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1 (was Re: [xml-dev]InfoWorld agrees with Elliote Rusty Harold) - 6/4/2004 5:05:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1 (was Re: [xml-dev]InfoWorld agrees with Elliote Rusty Harold) - 6/5/2004 1:53:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] The triples datamodel -- was Re: [xml-dev] Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1 - 6/5/2004 9:21:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] The triples datamodel -- was Re: [xml-dev] Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1 - 6/5/2004 9:57:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1 (was Re: [xml-dev] InfoWorld agrees with Elliote Rusty Harold) - 6/3/2004 8:34:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] The triples datamodel -- was Re: [xml-dev] Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1 - 6/3/2004 9:23:00 PM
Extreme 2004 Program Now Available - 6/3/2004 10:58:00 PM
xul developers list - 6/3/2004 11:03:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1 (was Re: [xml-dev]InfoWorld agrees with Elliote Rusty Harold) - 6/4/2004 12:15:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] The triples datamodel -- was Re: [xml-dev] Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1 - 6/4/2004 2:53:00 AM
Test, please ignore - 6/4/2004 3:45:00 AM
OT: John Cowan announces the "Unix Power Classic" - 6/4/2004 4:10:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] Bruce Perens and yet more patents - 6/4/2004 8:53:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] The triples datamodel -- was Re: [xml-dev] Semantic Webpermathread, iteration n+1 - 6/4/2004 9:48:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] Bruce Perens and yet more patents - 6/4/2004 1:32:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] The triples datamodel -- was Re: [xml-dev] Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1 - 6/4/2004 1:50:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Bruce Perens and yet more patents - 6/4/2004 1:51:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] The triples datamodel -- was Re: [xml-dev] Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1 - 6/4/2004 3:01:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] The triples datamodel -- was Re: [xml-dev] Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1 - 6/4/2004 4:25:00 PM
new to xml, looking for comments on our xml/xsl tutorialproject - 6/4/2004 5:11:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] The triples datamodel -- was Re: [xml-dev] Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1 - 6/4/2004 7:07:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1 (was Re: [xml-dev] InfoWorld agrees with Elliote Rusty Harold) - 6/4/2004 9:43:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1 (was Re: [xml-dev] InfoWorld agrees with Elliote Rusty Harold) - 6/5/2004 1:07:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] The triples datamodel -- was Re: [xml-dev] SemanticWeb permathread, iteration n+1 - 6/5/2004 1:16:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1 (was Re: [xml-dev] InfoWorld agrees with Elliote Rusty Harold) - 6/5/2004 2:10:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1 (was Re: [xml-dev] InfoWorld agrees with Elliote Rusty Harold) - 6/5/2004 2:53:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1 (was Re: [xml-dev] InfoWorld agrees with Elliote Rusty Harold) - 6/5/2004 5:23:00 PM
syntactical clarity of datamodels, rdf? - 6/5/2004 5:23:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1 (was Re: [xml-dev] InfoWorld agrees with Elliote Rusty Harold) - 6/5/2004 5:39:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] The triples datamodel -- was Re: [xml-dev] Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1 - 6/5/2004 10:26:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1 (was Re: [xml-dev] InfoWorld agrees with Elliote Rusty Harold) - 6/6/2004 1:49:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] The triples datamodel -- was Re: [xml-dev] Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1 - 6/6/2004 5:19:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] The triples datamodel -- was Re: [xml-dev] Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1 - 6/6/2004 10:10:00 PM
To know about RPC Vs document - 6/7/2004 12:14:00 PM
What's wrong w/ nested elements? - 6/7/2004 12:33:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] The triples datamodel -- was Re: [xml-dev] Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1 - 6/7/2004 12:48:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] What's wrong w/ nested elements? - 6/7/2004 2:56:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] What's wrong w/ nested elements? - 6/7/2004 3:51:00 PM
Conformance Testing and Schemas (WAS RE: [xml-dev] The triples datamodel -- was Re: [xml-dev] Sema ntic Web permathread, iteration n+1) - 6/7/2004 3:54:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] What's wrong w/ nested elements? - 6/7/2004 5:08:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] What's wrong w/ nested elements? - 6/7/2004 7:46:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] What's wrong w/ nested elements? - 6/7/2004 8:19:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1 (was Re: [xml-dev] InfoWorld agrees with Elliote Rusty Harold) - 6/8/2004 3:50:00 AM
Difference between RPC and Doc. type in WSDL(need help) - 6/8/2004 4:22:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] The triples datamodel -- was Re: [xml-dev] SemanticWebpermathread, iteration n+1 - 6/8/2004 9:56:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] The triples datamodel -- was Re: [xml-dev] Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1 - 6/8/2004 1:32:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Conformance Testing and Schemas (WAS RE: [xml-dev] The triples da tamodel -- was Re: [xml-dev] Sema ntic Web permathread, iteration n+1 ) - 6/8/2004 1:33:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Bruce Perens and yet more patents - 6/8/2004 1:39:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] The triples datamodel -- was Re: [xml-dev] Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1 - 6/8/2004 2:10:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] The triples datamodel -- was Re: [xml-dev] Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1 - 6/8/2004 2:30:00 PM
[ANN] Exchanger XML Editor 2.0 Released - 6/8/2004 2:36:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] The triples datamodel -- was Re: [xml-dev] Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1 - 6/8/2004 3:02:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] The triples datamodel -- was Re: [xml-dev] Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1 - 6/8/2004 4:32:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] The triples datamodel - 6/8/2004 6:24:00 PM
Fun With Mathematics - 6/8/2004 7:43:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] The triples datamodel -- was Re: [xml-dev] Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1 - 6/8/2004 8:48:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Bruce Perens and yet more patents - 6/8/2004 9:14:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1 (was Re: [xml-dev] InfoWorld agrees with Elliote Rusty Harold) - 6/8/2004 10:23:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] The triples datamodel - 6/8/2004 10:32:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] The triples datamodel -- was Re: [xml-dev] Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1 - 6/8/2004 11:01:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Meta-somethingorother (was the semantic web mega-permathread thing) - 6/9/2004 12:48:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Meta-somethingorother (was the semantic web mega-permathread thing) - 6/9/2004 1:34:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Meta-somethingorother (was the semantic web mega-permathread thing) - 6/9/2004 1:57:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Meta-somethingorother (was the semantic web mega-permathread thing) - 6/9/2004 6:20:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] Meta-somethingorother (was the semantic web mega-permathread thing) - 6/9/2004 2:20:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] Bruce Perens and yet more patents - 6/9/2004 8:14:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] Meta-somethingorother (was the semantic webmega-permathread thing) - 6/9/2004 8:52:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] The triples datamodel -- was Re: [xml-dev] SemanticWeb permathread, iteration n+1 - 6/9/2004 9:56:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] Meta-somethingorother (was the semantic webmega-permathread thing) - 6/9/2004 12:21:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] The triples datamodel - 6/9/2004 1:36:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Bruce Perens and yet more patents - 6/9/2004 1:44:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Meta-somethingorother (was the semantic web mega-permathread thing) - 6/9/2004 2:07:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] The triples datamodel - 6/9/2004 2:19:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] The triples datamodel - 6/9/2004 2:51:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Meta-somethingorother (was the semantic web mega-permathread thing) - 6/9/2004 3:36:00 PM
Schema constructs - 6/9/2004 3:42:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Meta-somethingorother (was the semantic web mega-permathread thing) - 6/9/2004 3:49:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Meta-somethingorother (was the semantic web mega-permathread thing) - 6/9/2004 3:53:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Meta-somethingorother (was the semantic web mega-permathread thing) - 6/9/2004 4:01:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] The triples datamodel -- was Re: [xml-dev] Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1 - 6/9/2004 4:04:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Meta-somethingorother (was the semantic web mega-permathread thing) - 6/9/2004 4:11:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Meta-somethingorother (was the semantic web mega-permathread thing) - 6/9/2004 4:25:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Meta-somethingorother (was the semantic web mega-permathread thing) - 6/9/2004 4:41:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Schema constructs - 6/9/2004 4:53:00 PM
cdata - 6/9/2004 4:54:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Meta-somethingorother (was the semantic web mega-permathread thing) - 6/9/2004 6:20:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] cdata - 6/9/2004 6:29:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Meta-somethingorother (was the semantic web mega-permathread thing) - 6/9/2004 6:48:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] The triples datamodel -- was Re: [xml-dev] Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1 - 6/9/2004 7:30:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Meta-somethingorother (was the semantic web mega-permathread thing) - 6/9/2004 7:30:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Meta-somethingorother (was the semantic web mega-permathread thing) - 6/9/2004 11:01:00 PM
Fwd: [xml-dev] Meta-somethingorother (was the semantic web mega-permathread thing) - 6/10/2004 12:56:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] Schema constructs - 6/10/2004 9:21:00 AM
[ANNOUNCE] Sedna v0.2 released - 6/10/2004 4:01:00 PM
Testing XPath without XSLT? - 6/10/2004 5:06:00 PM
ANN: XSL-on-the-fly WYSIWYG XML Editor Syntext Serna 2.0 Beta - 6/10/2004 5:49:00 PM
[ANN] Oxygen XML Editor 4.1adds the first XSLT Debugger on Eclipse - 6/10/2004 6:09:00 PM
Validating against Schema from string, not URI - 6/10/2004 7:48:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Testing XPath without XSLT? - 6/10/2004 8:18:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Meta-somethingorother (was the semantic web mega-permathread thing) - 6/10/2004 8:58:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Meta-somethingorother (was the semantic webmega-permathread thing) - 6/11/2004 11:43:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Meta-somethingorother (was the semantic web mega-permathread thing) - 6/11/2004 4:51:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Meta-somethingorother (was the semantic webmega-permathread thing) - 6/12/2004 1:13:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Meta-somethingorother (was the semantic web mega-permathread thing) - 6/14/2004 2:18:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Meta-somethingorother (was the semantic web mega-permathread thing) - 6/14/2004 2:46:00 PM
RDF == the "binary relational model"? was Re: [xml-dev] Meta-somethingorother - 6/14/2004 4:35:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] RDF == the "binary relational model"? - 6/14/2004 5:29:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] RDF == the "binary relational model"? was Re: [xml-dev] Meta-somethingorother - 6/14/2004 9:58:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] The triples datamodel -- was Re: [xml-dev] Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1 - 6/10/2004 9:03:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Meta-somethingorother (was the semantic webmega-permathread thing) - 6/11/2004 1:57:00 PM
Fertile SemWebApps - 6/11/2004 2:06:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Meta-somethingorother (was the semantic web mega-permathread thing) - 6/11/2004 3:55:00 PM
Announce: Public XSLT/XSL-FO training in Phoenix in August [XML-Dev] - 6/11/2004 4:58:00 PM
[ANN] Saxon 8.0 - Schema-Aware XSLT and XQuery processing - 6/11/2004 5:07:00 PM
Another approach to semantic alignment - 6/11/2004 6:46:00 PM
EFF seeking ten patents to challenge (deadline 23 June) - 6/11/2004 7:51:00 PM
XSLT subtree pruning/ filtering using namespace - 6/12/2004 10:20:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Meta-somethingorother (was the semantic web mega-permathread thing) - 6/12/2004 10:52:00 AM
Interesting nodes are anonymous, was: Re: [xml-dev] Meta-somethingorother (was the semantic web mega-permathread thing) - 6/12/2004 1:52:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Interesting nodes are anonymous,was: Re: [xml-dev] Meta-somethingorother (was the semantic webmega-permathread thing) - 6/12/2004 3:10:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Interesting nodes are anonymous, was: Re: [xml-dev] Meta-somethingorother (was the semantic web mega-permathread thing) - 6/12/2004 3:24:00 PM
Triplets on the Internet - 6/14/2004 1:07:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Meta-somethingorother (was the semantic web mega-permathread thing) - 6/12/2004 2:00:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Meta-somethingorother (was the semantic web mega-permathread thing) - 6/12/2004 2:17:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Meta-somethingorother (was the semantic web mega-permathread thing) - 6/12/2004 2:59:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Meta-somethingorother (was the semantic web mega-permathread thing) - 6/12/2004 3:02:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Meta-somethingorother (was the semantic web mega-permathreadthing) - 6/12/2004 3:03:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Meta-somethingorother (was the semantic webmega-permathread thing) - 6/12/2004 3:15:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Meta-somethingorother (was the semantic web mega-permathread thing) - 6/12/2004 3:19:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Meta-somethingorother (was the semantic web mega-permathreadthing) - 6/12/2004 4:03:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Meta-somethingorother (was the semantic web mega-permathread thing) - 6/12/2004 4:47:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Meta-somethingorother (was the semantic web mega-permathread thing) - 6/12/2004 4:58:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Meta-somethingorother (was the semantic web mega-permathreadthing) - 6/12/2004 5:00:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Meta-somethingorother (was the semantic web mega-permathread thing) - 6/12/2004 5:08:00 PM
Leading the web...elsewhere? - 6/12/2004 5:09:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Meta-somethingorother (was the semantic web mega-permathreadthing) - 6/12/2004 5:19:00 PM
How I learned to stop worrying and love the semantic web - was Re: [xml-dev] Meta-somethingorother - 6/12/2004 6:32:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Meta-somethingorother (was the semantic web mega-permathread thing) - 6/12/2004 7:22:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Interesting nodes are anonymous, was: Re: [xml-dev]Meta-somethingorother (was the semantic web mega-permathread thing) - 6/12/2004 7:32:00 PM
XML schema: how to define choice between value as an attribute and value as element text - 6/12/2004 8:46:00 PM
RE: Interesting nodes are anonymous, was: Re: [xml-dev] Meta-somethingorother (was the semantic web mega-permathread thing) - 6/13/2004 4:40:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Interesting nodes are anonymous, was: Re: [xml-dev] Meta-somethingorother (was the semantic web mega-permathread thing) - 6/13/2004 5:34:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] How I learned to stop worrying and love the semantic web - was Re: [xml-dev] Meta-somethingorother - 6/13/2004 3:22:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Triplets on the Internet - 6/14/2004 5:43:00 AM
Prospero and other URLs with // in path - 6/14/2004 11:36:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] Meta-somethingorother (was the semantic web mega-permathread thing) - 6/14/2004 1:52:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Meta-somethingorother (was the semantic web mega-permathread thing) - 6/14/2004 3:13:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Early Draft Review: XQuery for Java (JSR 225) - 6/14/2004 5:03:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Meta-somethingorother (was the semantic web mega-permathread thing) - 6/14/2004 6:19:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Meta-somethingorother (was the semantic web mega-permathread thing) - 6/14/2004 7:11:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Meta-somethingorother (was the semantic web mega-permathread thing) - 6/14/2004 7:24:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Triplets on the Internet - 6/14/2004 7:29:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Triplets on the Internet - 6/14/2004 8:43:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Triplets on the Internet - 6/14/2004 9:17:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Early Draft Review: XQuery for Java (JSR 225) - 6/14/2004 9:19:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Meta-somethingorother (was the semantic web mega-pe rmathread thing) - 6/14/2004 9:37:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Meta-somethingorother (was the semantic web mega-pe rmathread thing) - 6/17/2004 9:23:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Meta-somethingorother (was the semantic web mega-pe rmathread thing) - 6/18/2004 4:44:00 PM
specs in RDF/OWL, was: Re: [xml-dev] Meta-somethingorother - 6/18/2004 5:35:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] specs in RDF/OWL, was: Re: [xml-dev] Meta-somethingorother - 6/18/2004 5:52:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Triplets on the Internet - 6/14/2004 9:58:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Early Draft Review: XQuery for Java (JSR 225) - 6/15/2004 10:29:00 AM
HELP psychotic namespaces! - 6/15/2004 11:42:00 AM
Semantic Web Services - 6/15/2004 2:08:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Triplets on the Internet - 6/15/2004 2:41:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Semantic Web Services - 6/15/2004 3:22:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Semantic Web Services - 6/15/2004 3:46:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Semantic Web Services - 6/15/2004 5:53:00 PM
RE: Semantic Web Services - 6/15/2004 6:51:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Triplets on the Internet - 6/16/2004 2:50:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Triplets on the Internet - 6/16/2004 3:04:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Triplets on the Internet - 6/16/2004 5:14:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Triplets on the Internet - 6/16/2004 5:17:00 PM
SAX dot NET - Unifying Extension interfaces - 6/16/2004 6:20:00 PM
ANN: XBIS 0.9.5 and articles (binary XML permathread) - 6/16/2004 7:29:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] progressive parsing of XML. Any technology out there? - 6/16/2004 8:10:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] ANN: XBIS 0.9.5 and articles (binary XML permathread) - 6/16/2004 9:21:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] New Infoworld article on XML and relational databases - 6/16/2004 10:05:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Early Draft Review: XQuery for Java (JSR 225) - 6/16/2004 11:44:00 PM
Microsoft Proves Pronouns Patentable - 6/17/2004 12:04:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] New Infoworld article on XML and relational databases - 6/17/2004 12:48:00 AM
ebXML examples - 6/17/2004 1:02:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] ebXML examples - 6/17/2004 4:48:00 PM
Extreme Late-breaking Call for Participation - 6/17/2004 9:10:00 PM
Inheritance in XML - 6/17/2004 10:12:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] ebXML examples - 6/18/2004 5:03:00 AM
XML schema problem for two definitions of the same element. - 6/18/2004 7:27:00 AM
DTDDoc - 6/18/2004 10:24:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] Inheritance in XML - 6/18/2004 3:07:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Meta-somethingorother (was the semantic web mega-pe rmathread thing) - 6/18/2004 4:37:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Early Draft Review: XQuery for Java (JSR 225) - 6/19/2004 7:50:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Early Draft Review: XQuery for Java (JSR 225) - 6/20/2004 8:00:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Early Draft Review: XQuery for Java (JSR 225) - 6/21/2004 12:12:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Early Draft Review: XQuery for Java (JSR 225) - 6/21/2004 5:53:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Early Draft Review: XQuery for Java (JSR 225) - 6/21/2004 7:55:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Early Draft Review: XQuery for Java (JSR 225) - 6/22/2004 9:36:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Early Draft Review: XQuery for Java (JSR 225) - 6/22/2004 10:26:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Early Draft Review: XQuery for Java (JSR 225) - 6/23/2004 9:10:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Early Draft Review: XQuery for Java (JSR 225) - 6/23/2004 4:54:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Early Draft Review: XQuery for Java (JSR 225) - 6/28/2004 10:13:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Early Draft Review: XQuery for Java (JSR 225) - 6/28/2004 10:47:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Early Draft Review: XQuery for Java (JSR 225) - 6/29/2004 6:25:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Early Draft Review: XQuery for Java (JSR 225) - 6/29/2004 8:18:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Early Draft Review: XQuery for Java (JSR 225) - 6/29/2004 8:38:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Early Draft Review: XQuery for Java (JSR 225) - 6/30/2004 12:31:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Early Draft Review: XQuery for Java (JSR 225) - 6/30/2004 6:58:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Early Draft Review: XQuery for Java (JSR 225) - 6/30/2004 7:19:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] ebXML examples - 6/21/2004 12:27:00 AM
XML ... simple building blocks, simple assembly mechanisms, endless complexity - 6/21/2004 1:45:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] XML ... simple building blocks, simple assembly mechanisms, endless complexity - 6/21/2004 1:56:00 PM
OFFTOPIC: Go SpaceShipOne - 6/21/2004 3:27:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] XML ... simple building blocks, simple assembly mechanisms, endless complexity - 6/21/2004 6:07:00 PM
question about restrictions - 6/21/2004 10:17:00 PM
how to make the order of elements in the DTD null n void - 6/22/2004 11:16:00 AM
[ANN] xframe - xsddoc-0.5-beta released - 6/22/2004 2:33:00 PM
[Ann] freebXML Registry version 3.0-alpha2 release - 6/22/2004 8:32:00 PM
ANN: Syntext Dtd2Xs v2.0: XML DTD to XML Schema Converter - 6/23/2004 2:07:00 PM
How It All Goes Wrong (WAS RE: [xml-dev] Triplets on the Internet) - 6/23/2004 2:51:00 PM
Unsubscribing - 6/23/2004 5:04:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] How It All Goes Wrong (WAS RE: [xml-dev] Triplets on the Internet) - 6/23/2004 6:55:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] How It All Goes Wrong (WAS RE: [xml-dev] Triplets on the Internet) - 6/23/2004 7:53:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] How It All Goes Wrong (WAS RE: [xml-dev] Triplets on the Internet) - 6/23/2004 7:59:00 PM
What is the difference between the XMLinfoset and Canonical xml? - 6/23/2004 9:45:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] How It All Goes Wrong (WAS RE: [xml-dev] Triplets on the Internet) - 6/23/2004 10:24:00 PM
governmental recommendation(non-US) that rpc(RFC1831) should be abandoned - 6/24/2004 8:57:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] How It All Goes Wrong (WAS RE: [xml-dev] Triplets on the Internet) - 6/24/2004 1:44:00 PM
XML Technologies: Progress via Simplification or Complexification? - 6/24/2004 1:47:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] XML Technologies: Progress via Simplification or Complexification? - 6/24/2004 2:09:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] XML Technologies: Progress via Simplification or Complexification? - 6/24/2004 2:28:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] XML Technologies: Progress via Simplification or Complexification? - 6/24/2004 3:09:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] XML Technologies: Progress via Simplification or Co mplexification? - 6/24/2004 4:17:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] XML Technologies: Progress via Simplification or Complexification? - 6/25/2004 1:30:00 PM
xs:group/xs:choice[@minOccurs | @maxOccurs] - 6/25/2004 6:20:00 PM
this is a test, please ignore - 6/28/2004 2:43:00 AM
ANNOUNCEMENT: vtd-xml just released under GPL - 6/28/2004 2:57:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] XML Technologies: Progress via Simplification or Complexification? - 6/28/2004 2:05:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] XML Technologies: Progress via Simplification or Co mplexification? - 6/28/2004 2:55:00 PM
RE: RE: [xml-dev] XML Technologies: Progress via Simplification or Co mplexification? - 6/28/2004 3:16:00 PM
XML 2004: call for artwork - 6/28/2004 4:34:00 PM
RE: RE: [xml-dev] XML Technologies: Progress via Simplification or Complexification? - 6/28/2004 4:38:00 PM
RE: RE: [xml-dev] XML Technologies: Progress via Simplification or Co mplexification? - 6/28/2004 5:22:00 PM
fast-infoset and fast-webservices (ASN.1 and XML) - 6/28/2004 5:49:00 PM
RE: RE: [xml-dev] XML Technologies: Progress via Simplification or Co mplexification? - 6/28/2004 7:22:00 PM
RE: RE: [xml-dev] XML Technologies: Progress via Simplification or Co mplexification? - 6/28/2004 7:33:00 PM
RE: RE: [xml-dev] XML Technologies: Progress via Simplification or Co mplexification? - 6/28/2004 8:16:00 PM
ANN: Fantastic XML editor for OS X - Alpha Test 1 - 6/28/2004 11:32:00 PM
[ANN] XML Standards Library 2.1 : Updated 2004-06-29 - 6/29/2004 3:52:00 AM
hi all - 6/29/2004 11:16:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] How It All Goes Wrong (WAS RE: [xml-dev] Triplets on the Internet) - 6/29/2004 1:57:00 PM
Standards and Colonies - 6/29/2004 2:28:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Early Draft Review: XQuery for Java (JSR 225) - 6/29/2004 5:00:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Early Draft Review: XQuery for Java (JSR 225) - 6/29/2004 6:46:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Early Draft Review: XQuery for Java (JSR 225) - 6/29/2004 6:55:00 PM
ANN: New XML Differencing, Updated XML Mapping in Stylus Studio 5.3 - 6/29/2004 8:13:00 PM
Choosing the correct XML API - 6/29/2004 9:58:00 PM
ANN: Excelsior! Path Preview 0.1 - 6/30/2004 3:43:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Early Draft Review: XQuery for Java (JSR 225) - 6/30/2004 7:57:00 AM
problem saving microsoft.xmldom object - 6/30/2004 11:54:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] Early Draft Review: XQuery for Java (JSR 225) - 6/30/2004 4:18:00 PM
ANN: Oracle XDK 10.1.0.2.0 for AIX, HP-UX64 and LINUX production release - 6/30/2004 6:46:00 PM


transparent
Print
Mail
Like It
Disclaimer
.

These Archives are provided for informational purposes only and have been generated directly from the Altova mailing list archive system and are comprised of the lists set forth on www.altova.com/list/index.html. Therefore, Altova does not warrant or guarantee the accuracy, reliability, completeness, usefulness, non-infringement of intellectual property rights, or quality of any content on the Altova Mailing List Archive(s), regardless of who originates that content. You expressly understand and agree that you bear all risks associated with using or relying on that content. Altova will not be liable or responsible in any way for any content posted including, but not limited to, any errors or omissions in content, or for any losses or damage of any kind incurred as a result of the use of or reliance on any content. This disclaimer and limitation on liability is in addition to the disclaimers and limitations contained in the Website Terms of Use and elsewhere on the site.

.
.

transparent

transparent