Home. 
.

transparent

transparent

transparent

Altova Mailing List Archives


RE: [xml-dev] best practice for providing newsfeeds ?

From: "Joshua Allen" <joshuaa@---------.--->
To: "Danny Ayers" <danny666@--------.-->,"Tim Bray" <tbray@----------.--->
Date: 2/2/2004 6:53:00 PM
> > > RSS 2.0 is being used by New York Times, Microsoft, and many other
> > > "real" organizations to provide feeds to the masses.  It's the
safest
> > > choice, IMO.
> >
> > I also think that at this moment in time, RSS 2.0 is the safest
choice.
> > -Tim
> >

BTW, considering that RSS 2.0 is working just fine for the typical
boring enterprise (and there doesn't seem to be any groundswell of
discontent about things that it doesn't enable) what are the reasons
that we think people would switch to Atom?

Specifically, what business reasons would someone use to justify a
switch to Atom?  The technical arguments are nice for techies, but not
very useful for the guy making spending decisions.

I'm asking this honestly -- I don't really have any problem with Atom,
but I have always felt that the business decision-makers feel that "if
it's not broke, don't fix it".  And RSS's "brokenness" seems to be
something of concern only to techies right now...

Regards,
Joshua


transparent
Print
Mail
Like It
Disclaimer
.

These Archives are provided for informational purposes only and have been generated directly from the Altova mailing list archive system and are comprised of the lists set forth on www.altova.com/list/index.html. Therefore, Altova does not warrant or guarantee the accuracy, reliability, completeness, usefulness, non-infringement of intellectual property rights, or quality of any content on the Altova Mailing List Archive(s), regardless of who originates that content. You expressly understand and agree that you bear all risks associated with using or relying on that content. Altova will not be liable or responsible in any way for any content posted including, but not limited to, any errors or omissions in content, or for any losses or damage of any kind incurred as a result of the use of or reliance on any content. This disclaimer and limitation on liability is in addition to the disclaimers and limitations contained in the Website Terms of Use and elsewhere on the site.

.
.

transparent

transparent