Altova Mailing List Archives

xml-dev



RE: [xml-dev] reaching humans (was Re: [xml-dev] Extract A Subsetof a W3C XML Schema?) - 8/1/2003 12:01:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] reaching humans (was Re: [xml-dev] Extract A Subset of a W3C XML Schema?) - 8/1/2003 12:09:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] reaching humans (was Re: [xml-dev] Extract A Subset of a W3C XML Schema?) - 8/1/2003 12:50:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] DTDs: Teilite vs. Sdocbook - 8/1/2003 12:12:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] more politics - 8/1/2003 12:13:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Extract A Subset of a W3C XML Schema? - 8/1/2003 12:15:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] reaching humans (was Re: [xml-dev] Extract A Subset of a W3C XML Schema?) - 8/1/2003 12:17:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] reaching humans (was Re: [xml-dev] Extract A Subset of a W3C XML Schema?) - 8/1/2003 12:20:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] reaching humans (was Re: [xml-dev] Extract A Subsetof a W3C XML Schema?) - 8/1/2003 2:45:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Defining non-WXS datatypes - 8/1/2003 12:24:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] reaching humans (was Re: [xml-dev] Extract A Subsetof a W3C XML Schema?) - 8/1/2003 12:35:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Extract A Subset of a W3C XML Schema? - 8/1/2003 12:39:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] reaching humans (was Re: [xml-dev] Extract A Subset of a W3C XML Schema?) - 8/1/2003 12:41:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] [MAILER-DAEMON@reutershealth.com: Returned mail: Host unknown (Name server: lists.org.xml: host not found)] - 8/1/2003 12:50:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Binary XML == "spawn of the devil" ? - 8/1/2003 12:53:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] reaching humans (was Re: [xml-dev] Extract A Subset of a W3C XML Schema?) - 8/1/2003 12:58:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] more politics - 8/1/2003 1:09:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Extract A Subset of a W3C XML Schema? - 8/1/2003 1:18:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Defining non-WXS datatypes - 8/1/2003 1:20:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] reaching humans (was Re: [xml-dev] Extract A Subset of a W3C XML Schema?) - 8/1/2003 1:38:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] reaching humans (was Re: [xml-dev] Extract A Subset of a W3C XML Schema?) - 8/1/2003 2:01:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] String interning (Was: [xml-dev] Binary XML == "spawn of the devil" ?) - 8/1/2003 2:01:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] [MAILER-DAEMON@reutershealth.com: Returned mail: Host unknown (Name server: lists.org.xml: host not found)] - 8/1/2003 4:13:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Defining non-WXS datatypes - 8/1/2003 5:16:00 AM
multiple schemas, annotations - 8/1/2003 6:25:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] more politics - 8/1/2003 6:45:00 AM
XSL transformation clientside errors - 8/1/2003 7:19:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Defining non-WXS datatypes - 8/1/2003 7:42:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] reaching humans (was Re: [xml-dev] Extract A Subset of a W3C XML Schema?) - 8/1/2003 11:22:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] reaching humans (was Re: [xml-dev] Extract A Subset of a W3C XML Schema?) - 8/1/2003 12:33:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] How did "public identifier" get its name... - 8/1/2003 1:34:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] more politics - 8/1/2003 1:34:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] reaching humans (was Re: [xml-dev] Extract A Subsetof a W3C XML Schema?) - 8/1/2003 1:51:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Extract A Subset of a W3C XML Schema? - 8/1/2003 3:01:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Binary XML == "spawn of the devil" ? - 8/2/2003 11:34:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Binary XML == "spawn of the devil" ? - 8/2/2003 11:46:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Binary XML == "spawn of the devil" ? - 8/3/2003 12:16:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Binary XML == "spawn of the devil" ? - 8/3/2003 10:17:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Binary XML == "spawn of the devil" ? - 8/3/2003 11:45:00 PM
A parentless element that is not the document node - how? - 8/4/2003 12:13:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] A parentless element that is not the document node - how? - 8/4/2003 2:01:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] A parentless element that is not the document node - how? - 8/4/2003 2:01:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] A parentless element that is not the document node -how? - 8/4/2003 2:19:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] A parentless element that is not the document node - how? - 8/4/2003 6:16:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] String interning (Was: [xml-dev] Binary XML == "spawn of the devil" ?) - 8/4/2003 3:36:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] String interning (Was: [xml-dev] Binary XML == "spawn of the devil" ?) - 8/4/2003 6:11:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] String interning (Was: [xml-dev] Binary XML == "spawn of the devil" ?) - 8/4/2003 6:25:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] String interning (Was: [xml-dev] Binary XML == "spawn of the devil" ?) - 8/5/2003 3:56:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] String interning (Was: [xml-dev] Binary XML == "spawnof the devil" ?) - 8/5/2003 4:22:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Binary XML == "spawn of the devil" ? - 8/4/2003 3:53:00 PM
Number of name characters? - 8/4/2003 6:08:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Number of name characters? - 8/4/2003 9:27:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Binary XML == "spawn of the devil" ? - 8/4/2003 6:19:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] String interning (Was: [xml-dev] Binary XML == "spawn of the devil" ?) - 8/4/2003 6:26:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] A parentless element that is not the document node - how? - 8/4/2003 6:27:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Binary XML == "spawn of the devil" ? - 8/4/2003 6:51:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Binary XML == "spawn of the devil" ? - 8/4/2003 7:12:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] A parentless element that is not the document node -how? - 8/4/2003 7:24:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Binary XML == "spawn of the devil" ? - 8/4/2003 7:38:00 PM
Near and Far (Was RE: [xml-dev] A parentless element that is not the document node - how?) - 8/4/2003 8:16:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Near and Far (Was RE: [xml-dev] A parentless element that is not the document node - how?) - 8/4/2003 8:30:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Number of name characters? - 8/4/2003 8:49:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Near and Far (Was RE: [xml-dev] A parentless element that is not the document node - how?) - 8/4/2003 9:12:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Near and Far (Was RE: [xml-dev] A parentless elemen t that is not the document node - how?) - 8/4/2003 9:31:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Near and Far (Was RE: [xml-dev] A parentless elemen t that is not the document node - how?) - 8/4/2003 9:50:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Near and Far (Was RE: [xml-dev] A parentless elemen t that is not the document node - how?) - 8/4/2003 9:54:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Near and Far (Was RE: [xml-dev] A parentless elemen t that is not the document node - how?) - 8/5/2003 4:35:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Near and Far (Was RE: [xml-dev] A parentless elemen t that is not the document node - how?) - 8/5/2003 12:39:00 PM
XMLURL problem! - 8/4/2003 9:26:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] A parentless element that is not the document node - how? - 8/4/2003 9:29:00 PM
Schema Conversion [was A parentless element that is not the documentnode - how?] - 8/5/2003 2:03:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] Near and Far (Was RE: [xml-dev] A parentless elemen t that is not the document node - how?) - 8/4/2003 9:39:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Near and Far (Was RE: [xml-dev] A parentless elemen t that is not the document node - how?) - 8/4/2003 11:49:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Near and Far (Was RE: [xml-dev] A parentless element that is not the document node - how?) - 8/5/2003 12:38:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] Near and Far (Was RE: [xml-dev] A parentless elemen t that is not the document node - how?) - 8/4/2003 9:56:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Near and Far (Was RE: [xml-dev] A parentless elemen t that is not the document node - how?) - 8/5/2003 4:01:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Near and Far (Was RE: [xml-dev] A parentless elemen t that is not the document node - how?) - 8/5/2003 5:01:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Number of name characters? - 8/4/2003 11:50:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Number of name characters? - 8/5/2003 12:21:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Number of name characters? - 8/5/2003 12:27:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Binary XML == "spawn of the devil" ? - 8/5/2003 4:32:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] Near and Far (Was RE: [xml-dev] A parentless elemen t that is not the document node - how?) - 8/5/2003 12:30:00 PM
Patented XML Compression Techniques (WAS RE: [xml-dev] Binary XML == "spawn of the devil" ?) - 8/5/2003 12:56:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Patented XML Compression Techniques (WAS RE: [xml-dev]Binary XML == "spawn of the devil" ?) - 8/5/2003 1:00:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Near and Far (Was RE: [xml-dev] A parentless elemen t that is not the document node - how?) - 8/5/2003 1:11:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Near and Far (Was RE: [xml-dev] A parentless elemen t that is not the document node - how?) - 8/5/2003 1:33:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Near and Far (Was RE: [xml-dev] A parentless element that is not the document node - how?) - 8/5/2003 4:20:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Near and Far (Was RE: [xml-dev] A parentless elemen t that is not the document node - how?) - 8/5/2003 1:17:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Patented XML Compression Techniques (WAS RE: [xml-dev] Binary XML == "spawn of the devil" ?) - 8/5/2003 1:33:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Patented XML Compression Techniques (WAS RE: [xml-dev]Binary XML == "spawn of the devil" ?) - 8/5/2003 1:47:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Patented XML Compression Techniques (WAS RE: [xml-d ev] Binary XML == "spawn of the devil" ?) - 8/5/2003 2:07:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Patented XML Compression Techniques (WAS RE: [xml-dev] Binary XML == "spawn of the devil" ?) - 8/7/2003 7:19:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Patented XML Compression Techniques (WAS RE: [xml-dev]Binary XML == "spawn of the devil" ?) - 8/7/2003 7:51:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Patented XML Compression Techniques (WAS RE: [xml-dev] Binary XML == "spawn of the devil" ?) - 8/8/2003 9:09:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] Near and Far (Was RE: [xml-dev] A parentless elemen t that is not the document node - how?) - 8/5/2003 1:48:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Patented XML Compression Techniques (WAS RE: [xml-d ev] Binary XML == "spawn of the devil" ?) - 8/5/2003 2:21:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Patented XML Compression Techniques (WAS RE: [xml-d ev] Binary XML == "spawn of the devil" ?) - 8/5/2003 2:54:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Patented XML Compression Techniques (WAS RE: [xml-dev] Binary XML == "spawn of the devil" ?) - 8/5/2003 9:44:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Patented XML Compression Techniques (WAS RE: [xml-dev] Binary XML == "spawn of the devil" ?) - 8/5/2003 11:54:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Patented XML Compression Techniques (WAS RE: [xml-d ev] Binary XML == "spawn of the devil" ?) - 8/6/2003 1:00:00 AM
Re: new line handling (DOMBuilder and DOMSerializer) - 8/5/2003 3:15:00 PM
Encoding URI's for xml validation - 8/5/2003 6:59:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Encoding URI's for xml validation - 8/5/2003 8:31:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Encoding URI's for xml validation - 8/10/2003 2:01:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Encoding URI's for xml validation - 8/10/2003 3:34:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Encoding URI's for xml validation - 8/10/2003 3:35:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] Patented XML Compression Techniques (WAS RE: [xml-d ev] Binary XML == "spawn of the devil" ?) - 8/6/2003 2:06:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Patented XML Compression Techniques (WAS RE: [xml-d ev] Binary XML == "spawn of the devil" ?) - 8/6/2003 9:45:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Patented XML Compression Techniques (WAS RE: [xml-d ev] Binary XML == "spawn of the devil" ?) - 8/6/2003 11:57:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Patented XML Compression Techniques (WAS RE: [xml-d ev] Binary XML == "spawn of the devil" ?) - 8/7/2003 12:40:00 AM
ANNOUNCE: VixX3D Beta Edtor - 8/6/2003 2:38:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Patented XML Compression Techniques (WAS RE: [xml-dev] Binary XML == "spawn of the devil" ?) - 8/6/2003 2:54:00 PM
XML-XML Mapping - 8/6/2003 3:28:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] XML-XML Mapping - 8/6/2003 4:42:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] XML-XML Mapping - 8/6/2003 6:46:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] XML-XML Mapping - 8/7/2003 8:24:00 AM
RTF to XML Conversion (Majix or otherwise) - 8/6/2003 11:15:00 PM
ANN: InferEd (RDF Editor w/ Inference) Beta2 Released - 8/7/2003 2:40:00 PM
What does RSS stand for? - 8/7/2003 6:37:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] What does RSS stand for? - 8/7/2003 8:13:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] What does RSS stand for? - 8/7/2003 8:14:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] What does RSS stand for? - 8/7/2003 6:41:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] What does RSS stand for? - 8/7/2003 6:45:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] What does RSS stand for? - 8/7/2003 7:08:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Patented XML Compression Techniques (WAS RE: [xml-d ev] Binary XML == "spawn of the devil" ?) - 8/7/2003 7:41:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Patented XML Compression Techniques (WAS RE: [xml-d ev] Binary XML == "spawn of the devil" ?) - 8/7/2003 8:19:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Patented XML Compression Techniques (WAS RE: [xml-d ev] Binary XML == "spawn of the devil" ?) - 8/7/2003 8:43:00 PM
[ANN] Exchanger XML Editor 1.0 Released - 8/7/2003 11:02:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] [ANN] Exchanger XML Editor 1.0 Released - 8/8/2003 8:56:00 AM
Re: [ANN] Exchanger XML Editor 1.0 Released - 8/10/2003 7:00:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] rss 0.91 with rdf extension - 8/8/2003 7:32:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] rss 0.91 with rdf extension - 8/8/2003 7:42:00 AM
Looking for a schema->html form XSL transform - 8/8/2003 11:44:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] Looking for a schema->html form XSL transform - 8/8/2003 8:03:00 PM
Determining version of MSXML in use - 8/8/2003 8:31:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Determining version of MSXML in use - 8/8/2003 9:00:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Looking for a schema->html form XSL transform - 8/8/2003 8:41:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Looking for a schema->html form XSL transform - 8/8/2003 10:31:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Looking for a schema->html form XSL transform - 8/8/2003 10:48:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Looking for a schema->html form XSL transform - 8/8/2003 10:40:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Looking for a schema->html form XSL transform - 8/8/2003 11:30:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Looking for a schema->html form XSL transform - 8/9/2003 1:00:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] Determining version of MSXML in use - 8/8/2003 11:55:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] tool to generate one standalone DTD from multiplemodule DTD - 8/9/2003 1:44:00 PM
Random thoughts on reflection - 8/9/2003 6:34:00 PM
re: [xml-dev] Random thoughts on reflection - 8/9/2003 7:57:00 PM
re: [xml-dev] Random thoughts on reflection - 8/9/2003 8:22:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Random thoughts on reflection - 8/11/2003 8:02:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Extract A Subset of a W3C XML Schema? - 8/10/2003 1:28:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Oasis website down? - 8/10/2003 7:57:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Oasis website down? - 8/10/2003 8:08:00 AM
ANN: Enhancing Data Interoperability with Ontologies, Canonical Forms, and Include Files - 8/10/2003 2:02:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Binary XML == "spawn of the devil" ? - 8/10/2003 5:39:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Binary XML == "spawn of the devil" ? - 8/10/2003 6:54:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Binary XML == "spawn of the devil" ? - 8/10/2003 7:55:00 PM
graphs and trees - 8/10/2003 9:37:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] graphs and trees - 8/10/2003 11:08:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Binary XML == "spawn of the devil" ? - 8/11/2003 1:17:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Binary XML == "spawn of the devil" ? - 8/11/2003 1:51:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Binary XML == "spawn of the devil" ? - 8/11/2003 8:48:00 AM
ANN: Syntext Serna Beta Release: XSL-on-the-fly WYSIWYG XML Editor - 8/11/2003 2:05:00 PM
Web Services and URIs - 8/11/2003 2:15:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Looking for a schema->html form XSL transform - 8/11/2003 5:38:00 PM
Automated ASCII to XML converter - 8/11/2003 8:36:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Automated ASCII to XML converter - 8/11/2003 9:58:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Automated ASCII to XML converter - 8/12/2003 2:11:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] A parentless element that is not the document node - how? - 8/11/2003 10:29:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Automated ASCII to XML converter - 8/11/2003 11:14:00 PM
Ambiguities in section 4.3.2 of XML 1.0 SE - 8/11/2003 11:48:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Ambiguities in section 4.3.2 of XML 1.0 SE - 8/12/2003 12:28:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Ambiguities in section 4.3.2 of XML 1.0 SE - 8/12/2003 1:00:00 AM
ANN: eXist native XML database 0.9.2 - 8/12/2003 1:38:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Ambiguities in section 4.3.2 of XML 1.0 SE - 8/12/2003 4:17:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Ambiguities in section 4.3.2 of XML 1.0 SE - 8/12/2003 4:29:00 PM
Symbol Grounding and Running Code: Is XML Really Extensible? - 8/12/2003 8:04:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Symbol Grounding and Running Code: Is XML Really Extensible? - 8/12/2003 8:31:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Symbol Grounding and Running Code: Is XML Really Extensible? - 8/12/2003 9:53:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Symbol Grounding and Running Code: Is XML Really Extensible? - 8/12/2003 10:12:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Symbol Grounding and Running Code: Is XML Really Extensible? - 8/13/2003 1:33:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Symbol Grounding and Running Code: Is XML Really Extensible? - 8/13/2003 1:59:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Symbol Grounding and Running Code: Is XML Really Extensible? - 8/13/2003 2:12:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Symbol Grounding and Running Code: Is XML Really Extensible? - 8/13/2003 2:25:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Symbol Grounding and Running Code: Is XML Really Extensible? - 8/13/2003 2:32:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Symbol Grounding and Running Code: Is XML Really Extensible? - 8/13/2003 9:28:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Symbol Grounding and Running Code: Is XML Really Extensible? - 8/12/2003 9:01:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Symbol Grounding and Running Code: Is XML Really Extensible? - 8/12/2003 9:12:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Symbol Grounding and Running Code: Is XML Really Extensible? - 8/12/2003 9:26:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Symbol Grounding and Running Code: Is XML Really Extensible? - 8/12/2003 9:58:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Symbol Grounding and Running Code: Is XML Really Extensible? - 8/12/2003 10:15:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Symbol Grounding and Running Code: Is XML Really Extensible? - 8/12/2003 10:32:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Symbol Grounding and Running Code: Is XML Really Extensible? - 8/12/2003 11:19:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Symbol Grounding and Running Code: Is XML Really Extensible? - 8/13/2003 12:40:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Symbol Grounding and Running Code: Is XML Really Extensible? - 8/12/2003 10:36:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Symbol Grounding and Running Code: Is XML Really Extensible? - 8/12/2003 10:43:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Symbol Grounding and Running Code: Is XML Really Extensible? - 8/13/2003 12:20:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] Symbol Grounding and Running Code: Is XML Really Extensible? - 8/13/2003 1:16:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] Symbol Grounding and Running Code: Is XML Really Extensible? - 8/13/2003 1:17:00 AM
Adding standalone - 8/13/2003 1:18:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Symbol Grounding and Running Code: Is XML Really Extensible? - 8/13/2003 1:58:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Symbol Grounding and Running Code: Is XML Really E xtensible? - 8/13/2003 2:19:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] XML database enviroment using PostgreSQL - 8/13/2003 2:37:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Symbol Grounding and Running Code: Is XML Really Extensible? - 8/13/2003 2:40:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] XML database enviroment using PostgreSQL - 8/13/2003 2:48:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Symbol Grounding and Running Code: Is XML Really E xtensible? - 8/13/2003 2:51:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Symbol Grounding and Running Code: Is XML Really E xtensible? - 8/13/2003 3:17:00 PM
embedding RDF in XHTML - 8/13/2003 3:32:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Symbol Grounding and Running Code: Is XML Really E xtensible? - 8/13/2003 3:49:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Symbol Grounding and Running Code: Is XML Really E xtensible? - 8/13/2003 3:56:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Symbol Grounding and Running Code: Is XML Really E xtensible? - 8/13/2003 8:29:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Symbol Grounding and Running Code: Is XML Really Extensible? - 8/13/2003 5:33:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Symbol Grounding and Running Code: Is XML Really Extensible? - 8/13/2003 6:42:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Symbol Grounding and Running Code: Is XML Really Extensible? (WAS RE: [xml-dev] Silly indemnity FUD) - 8/13/2003 5:45:00 PM
Re: Silly indemnity FUD - 8/13/2003 8:00:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Symbol Grounding and Running Code: Is XML Really Extensible? - 8/13/2003 6:06:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Symbol Grounding and Running Code: Is XML Really Extensible? - 8/13/2003 6:18:00 PM
Escaping XML? Flattening the parse tree? - 8/13/2003 7:23:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Escaping XML? Flattening the parse tree? - 8/13/2003 8:29:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Escaping XML? Flattening the parse tree? - 8/13/2003 8:57:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] XML database enviroment using PostgreSQL - 8/13/2003 7:54:00 PM
Data vs. Document-Oriented XML - Better Terms? (Was Re: [xml-dev] XML database enviroment using PostgreSQL) - 8/13/2003 7:58:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Symbol Grounding and Running Code: Is XML Really Extensible? - 8/13/2003 8:11:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Re: Silly indemnity FUD - 8/13/2003 8:15:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Re: Silly indemnity FUD - 8/13/2003 8:16:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Data vs. Document-Oriented XML - Better Terms? (Was Re: [xml-dev] XML database enviroment using PostgreSQL) - 8/13/2003 8:30:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Symbol Grounding and Running Code: Is XML Really E xtensible? - 8/13/2003 8:38:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Symbol Grounding and Running Code: Is XML Really E xtensible? - 8/13/2003 8:51:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Symbol Grounding and Running Code: Is XML Really Extensible? - 8/13/2003 9:36:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Symbol Grounding and Running Code: Is XML Really E xtensible? - 8/14/2003 12:52:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Symbol Grounding and Running Code: Is XML Really Extensible? - 8/13/2003 8:52:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Symbol Grounding and Running Code: Is XML Really Extensible? - 8/14/2003 7:04:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] Symbol Grounding and Running Code: Is XML Really E xtensible? - 8/13/2003 9:11:00 PM
Adding standalone="yes" to XML document - 8/14/2003 3:44:00 AM
XACML adding new functions - 8/14/2003 6:49:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] XACML adding new functions - 8/14/2003 12:51:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] XACML adding new functions - 8/14/2003 1:57:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] XACML adding new functions - 8/14/2003 2:03:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Re: Silly indemnity FUD - 8/14/2003 9:07:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] Symbol Grounding and Running Code: Is XML Really E xtensible? - 8/14/2003 1:21:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Symbol Grounding and Running Code: Is XML Really E xtensible? - 8/14/2003 2:53:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Symbol Grounding and Running Code: Is XML Really E xtensible? - 8/14/2003 7:48:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Symbol Grounding and Running Code: Is XML Really Extensible? - 8/14/2003 1:43:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Symbol Grounding and Running Code: Is XML Really E xtensible? - 8/14/2003 3:50:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Re: Silly indemnity FUD - 8/14/2003 1:50:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Symbol Grounding and Running Code: Is XML Really Extensible? - 8/14/2003 2:48:00 PM
SMIL markup - 8/14/2003 3:00:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Symbol Grounding and Running Code: Is XML Really E xtensible? - 8/14/2003 3:07:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Symbol Grounding and Running Code: Is XML Really Extensible? - 8/14/2003 3:38:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Adding standalone="yes" to XML document - 8/14/2003 4:08:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Adding standalone="yes" to XML document - 8/14/2003 4:08:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Adding standalone="yes" to XML document - 8/14/2003 5:20:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Symbol Grounding and Running Code: Is XML Really E xtensible? - 8/14/2003 4:23:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Symbol Grounding and Running Code: Is XML Really E xtensible? - 8/14/2003 5:28:00 PM
[ANN] XML Editor 2.0.3 - 8/14/2003 4:55:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Symbol Grounding and Running Code: Is XML Really E xtensible? - 8/14/2003 5:58:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Symbol Grounding and Running Code: Is XML Really E xtensible? - 8/15/2003 7:02:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] Paypal - 8/14/2003 6:12:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] XML database enviroment using PostgreSQL - 8/14/2003 6:24:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] XML database enviroment using PostgreSQL - 8/14/2003 6:57:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] XML database enviroment using PostgreSQL - 8/14/2003 7:09:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] XML database enviroment using PostgreSQL - 8/15/2003 10:34:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] XML database enviroment using PostgreSQL - 8/18/2003 1:05:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] XML database enviroment using PostgreSQL - 8/18/2003 2:00:00 PM
"Types" of XML (Was Re: [xml-dev] XML database enviroment using PostgreSQL) - 8/18/2003 2:19:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] "Types" of XML (Was Re: [xml-dev] XML databaseenviroment using PostgreSQL) - 8/18/2003 10:39:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] "Types" of XML (Was Re: [xml-dev] XML databaseenviroment using PostgreSQL) - 8/19/2003 7:52:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Paypal - 8/14/2003 6:58:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Paypal - 8/14/2003 7:10:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Symbol Grounding and Running Code: Is XML Really Extensible? (WAS RE: [xml-dev] Paypal)) - 8/14/2003 7:26:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Symbol Grounding and Running Code: Is XML Really E xtensible? (WAS RE: [xml-dev] Paypal)) - 8/15/2003 12:56:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Symbol Grounding and Running Code: Is XML Really E xtensible? - 8/14/2003 7:51:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Symbol Grounding and Running Code: Is XML Really E xtensible? - 8/16/2003 2:29:00 AM
Help with Schema - 8/14/2003 10:28:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Help with Schema - 8/14/2003 10:47:00 PM
Python/XML parsing - 8/14/2003 11:53:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Python/XML parsing - 8/15/2003 2:42:00 AM
Wiki SVG whiteboard - 8/15/2003 11:51:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] Symbol Grounding and Running Code: Is XML Really Extensible? (WAS RE: [xml-dev] Paypal)) - 8/15/2003 1:30:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Symbol Grounding and Running Code: Is XML Really E xtensible? - 8/15/2003 1:35:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Symbol Grounding and Running Code: Is XML Really E xtensible? - 8/15/2003 1:56:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Symbol Grounding and Running Code: Is XML Really E xtensible? - 8/15/2003 2:09:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Symbol Grounding and Running Code: Is XML Really Extensible? - 8/15/2003 4:29:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] thinking about "namespace pedantry" - 8/15/2003 5:16:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] thinking about "namespace pedantry" - 8/15/2003 7:37:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Java SAX tools (was: Re: [xml-dev] Adding standalone="yes" to XML document) - 8/15/2003 5:33:00 PM
The State of the XUL Union - 8/15/2003 7:40:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] thinking about "namespace pedantry" - 8/15/2003 8:55:00 PM
Xerces-C to parse DocBook xml - 8/16/2003 3:18:00 AM
Xerces-C to parse DocBook xml - 8/16/2003 3:18:00 AM
Xerces-C to parse DocBook xml - 8/16/2003 3:19:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Xerces-C to parse DocBook xml - 8/16/2003 4:05:00 AM
Announcement: XML Acronym Demystifier - 8/17/2003 1:03:00 PM
DocBook XML - Validating - 8/18/2003 9:35:00 AM
Parsing XML - 8/18/2003 4:20:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Binary XML == "spawn of the devil" ? - 8/18/2003 10:47:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Binary XML == "spawn of the devil" ? - 8/18/2003 11:27:00 AM
Federal Court says Microsoft infringed UC, Eolas Web Objects Patent - 8/18/2003 1:28:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Federal Court says Microsoft infringed UC, Eolas WebObjects Patent - 8/18/2003 1:53:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] XML database enviroment using PostgreSQL - 8/18/2003 1:44:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] XML database enviroment using PostgreSQL - 8/18/2003 1:50:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] XML database enviroment using PostgreSQL - 8/18/2003 2:01:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Federal Court says Microsoft infringed UC, Eolas Web Objects P... - 8/18/2003 2:06:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Federal Court says Microsoft infringed UC, Eolas WebObjects P... - 8/18/2003 2:25:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Federal Court says Microsoft infringed UC, Eolas Web Objects P... - 8/18/2003 10:22:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Federal Court says Microsoft infringed UC, Eolas WebObjects P... - 8/18/2003 10:46:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Federal Court says Microsoft infringed UC, Eolas Web Objects P... - 8/18/2003 11:06:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Federal Court says Microsoft infringed UC, Eolas WebObjects P... - 8/19/2003 8:23:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] XML database enviroment using PostgreSQL - 8/18/2003 2:17:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] XML database enviroment using PostgreSQL - 8/18/2003 10:37:00 PM
A standard approach to glueing together reusable XML fragments in prose? - 8/18/2003 4:15:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] A standard approach to glueing together reusable XML fragments in prose? - 8/18/2003 4:34:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] A standard approach to glueing together reusable XMLfragments in prose? - 8/19/2003 1:54:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] A standard approach to glueing together reusable XML fragments in prose? - 8/19/2003 3:53:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] A standard approach to glueing together reusable XML fragments in prose? - 8/19/2003 4:30:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] A standard approach to glueing together reusable XML fragments in prose? - 8/19/2003 4:51:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] A standard approach to glueing together reusable XML fragments in prose? - 8/19/2003 6:33:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] A standard approach to glueing together reusable XML fragments in prose? - 8/19/2003 7:01:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] A standard approach to glueing together reusable XML fragments in prose? - 8/19/2003 8:36:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] A standard approach to glueing together reusable XML fragments in prose? - 8/20/2003 11:02:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] A standard approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose? - 8/20/2003 12:40:00 PM
XML CMM and ISO9000 compliance? - was A standard approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose? - 8/25/2003 1:53:00 PM
Re: XML CMM and ISO9000 compliance? - was A standard approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose? - 8/25/2003 3:21:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] XML CMM and ISO9000 compliance? - was A standard approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose? - 8/26/2003 11:37:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] XML CMM and ISO9000 compliance? - was A standard approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose? - 8/27/2003 12:49:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] XML CMM and ISO9000 compliance? - was A standardapproach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose? - 8/27/2003 1:27:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] XML CMM and ISO9000 compliance? - was A standard approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose? - 8/26/2003 11:41:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] XML CMM and ISO9000 compliance? - was A standard approachto glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose? - 8/27/2003 1:26:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] XML CMM and ISO9000 compliance? - was A standard approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose? - 8/27/2003 2:50:00 AM
Re: XML CMM and ISO9000 compliance? - was A standard approach toglueing together reusableXML fragments in prose? - 8/25/2003 2:09:00 PM
Re: XML and the Relational Model - 8/25/2003 3:50:00 PM
Re: XML and the Relational Model - 8/26/2003 2:57:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Re: XML and the Relational Model - 8/27/2003 1:42:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] XML CMM and ISO9000 compliance? - was A standard approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose? - 8/26/2003 1:27:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] XML CMM and ISO9000 compliance? - was A standard approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose? - 8/27/2003 1:31:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] XML CMM and ISO9000 compliance? - was A standard approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose? - 8/26/2003 4:17:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] XML CMM and ISO9000 compliance? - was A standard approachto glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose? - 8/26/2003 3:33:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] XML CMM and ISO9000 compliance? - was A standard approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose? - 8/26/2003 11:38:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] XML CMM and ISO9000 compliance? - was A standard approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose? - 8/27/2003 12:12:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] XML CMM and ISO9000 compliance? - was A standard approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose? - 8/27/2003 2:57:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Re: XML and the Relational Model -- CMM & ISO 9000 - FINAL POST TO BOTH THREADS BY ME. - 8/28/2003 8:00:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] A standard approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose? - 8/20/2003 2:30:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] A standard approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose? - 8/21/2003 12:57:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] A standard approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose? - 8/21/2003 1:08:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] A standard approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose? - 8/25/2003 1:12:00 PM
XML and the Relational Model (was Re: [xml-dev] A standard approach to glueing together ...) - 8/25/2003 3:10:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] XML and the Relational Model (was Re: [xml-dev] Astandard approach to glueing together ...) - 8/25/2003 3:30:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] XML and the Relational Model (was Re: [xml-dev] A standardapproach to glueing together ...) - 8/26/2003 1:35:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] XML and the Relational Model (was Re: [xml-dev] A standardapproach to glueing together ...) - 8/26/2003 1:42:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] XML and the Relational Model (was Re: [xml-dev] Astandard approach to glueing together ...) - 8/26/2003 2:16:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] XML and the Relational Model (was Re: [xml-dev] Astandard approach to glueing together ...) - 8/26/2003 9:33:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] XML and the Relational Model (was Re: [xml-dev] A standard approach to glueing together ...) - 8/25/2003 4:54:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] XML and the Relational Model (was Re: [xml-dev] A standard approach to glueing together ...) - 8/25/2003 5:32:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] XML and the Relational Model (was Re: [xml-dev] A standard approach to glueing together ...) - 8/27/2003 1:15:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] XML and the Relational Model (was Re: [xml-dev] A standard approach to glueing together ...) - 8/25/2003 7:38:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] XML and the Relational Model (was Re: [xml-dev] A standard approach to glueing together ...) - 8/26/2003 10:55:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] A standard approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose? - 8/25/2003 3:24:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] XML and the Relational Model (was Re: [xml-dev] A standard approach to glueing together ...) - 8/25/2003 4:37:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] XML and the Relational Model (was Re: [xml-dev] A standard approach to glueing together ...) - 8/25/2003 6:36:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] XML and the Relational Model (was Re: [xml-dev] A standard approach to glueing together ...) - 8/26/2003 11:37:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] XML and the Relational Model (was Re: [xml-dev]A standard approach to glueing together ...) - 8/27/2003 1:35:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] XML and the Relational Model (was Re: [xml-dev] A standard approach to glueing together ...) - 8/27/2003 2:46:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] XML and the Relational Model (was Re: [xml-dev] Astandard approach to glueing together ...) - 8/25/2003 7:42:00 PM
Re: XML and the Relational Model - 8/26/2003 2:19:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Re: XML and the Relational Model - 8/26/2003 11:36:00 PM
Need help on JAXB! - 8/27/2003 10:19:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Re: XML and the Relational Model - 8/26/2003 2:39:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Re: XML and the Relational Model - 8/26/2003 5:17:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Re: XML and the Relational Model - 8/26/2003 5:33:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Re: XML and the Relational Model - 8/26/2003 5:47:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Re: XML and the Relational Model - 8/26/2003 9:30:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Re: XML and the Relational Model - 8/26/2003 9:46:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Re: XML and the Relational Model - 8/26/2003 11:23:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Re: XML and the Relational Model -- CMM & ISO 9000 - FINAL POST TO BOTH THREADS BY ME. - 8/28/2003 4:33:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Re: XML and the Relational Model -- CMM & ISO 9000 - FINAL POST TO BOTH THREADS BY ME. - 8/28/2003 5:03:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] A standard approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose? - 8/25/2003 2:00:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Re: XML CMM and ISO9000 compliance? - was A standard approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose? - 8/25/2003 10:49:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] A standard approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose? - 8/19/2003 10:58:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] A standard approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose? - 8/19/2003 11:11:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] A standard approach to glueing together reusable XML fragments in prose? - 8/20/2003 7:25:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] A standard approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose? - 8/20/2003 1:44:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] A standard approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose? - 8/20/2003 10:55:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] A standard approach to glueing together reusableXMLfragments in prose? - 8/20/2003 11:28:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] A standard approach to glueing together reusableXMLfragments in prose? - 8/21/2003 12:15:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] A standard approach to glueing together reusableXMLfragments in prose? - 8/21/2003 12:19:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] A standard approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose? - 8/21/2003 1:30:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] A standard approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose? - 8/21/2003 2:32:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] A standard approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose? - 8/21/2003 9:15:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] A standard approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose? - 8/21/2003 12:43:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] A standard approach to glueing together reusableXMLfragments in prose? - 8/21/2003 1:24:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] A standard approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose? - 8/21/2003 8:22:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] A standard approach to glueing together reusableXMLfragments in prose? - 8/22/2003 1:08:00 AM
RelaxNG question - 8/18/2003 5:26:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] RelaxNG question - 8/18/2003 10:47:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] RelaxNG question - 8/19/2003 2:43:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] tool to generate one standalone DTD from multiple module DTD - 8/18/2003 5:38:00 PM
[Fwd: [cam] Re: [xml-dev] A standard approach to glueing togetherreusable XML fragments in prose?] - 8/18/2003 6:21:00 PM
The XML Acronym Demystifier - 8/18/2003 6:51:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] The XML Acronym Demystifier - 8/18/2003 6:55:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] The XML Acronym Demystifier - 8/18/2003 7:15:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] question on XQuery -> SQL translators - 8/18/2003 7:16:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] XACML adding new functions - 8/18/2003 9:23:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] RelaxNG question - 8/18/2003 10:13:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] RelaxNG question - 8/18/2003 10:40:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] RelaxNG question - 8/18/2003 10:17:00 PM
The need for a formal description - 8/18/2003 11:42:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] RelaxNG question - 8/19/2003 11:24:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] RelaxNG question - 8/24/2003 4:46:00 PM
RE: A standard approach to glueing together reusable XML fragments in prose? - 8/19/2003 11:38:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] Federal Court says Microsoft infringed UC, Eolas Web Objects Patent - 8/19/2003 1:20:00 PM
What's the delay with XSLT/XPath 2.0? - 8/19/2003 1:30:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] What's the delay with XSLT/XPath 2.0? - 8/19/2003 3:36:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Binary XML == "spawn of the devil" ? - 8/19/2003 3:12:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] A standard approach to glueing together reusable XML fragments in prose? - 8/19/2003 6:55:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Are we ready for the namespace ID registry, yet? (was: RelaxNG question) - 8/19/2003 7:09:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Are we ready for the namespace ID registry, yet? (was: RelaxNG question) - 8/19/2003 7:43:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Are we ready for the namespace ID registry, yet? (was: RelaxNG question) - 8/19/2003 8:20:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Are we ready for the namespace ID registry, yet? (w as: RelaxNG question) - 8/19/2003 7:54:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Are we ready for the namespace ID registry, yet? (w as: RelaxNG question) - 8/19/2003 8:10:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Are we ready for the namespace ID registry, yet? (w as: RelaxNG question) - 8/19/2003 8:37:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Are we ready for the namespace ID registry, yet? (was: RelaxNG question) - 8/21/2003 10:20:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Are we ready for the namespace ID registry, yet? (w as: RelaxNG question) - 8/19/2003 8:47:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Are we ready for the namespace ID registry, yet? (was: RelaxNG question) - 8/19/2003 9:40:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Are we ready for the namespace ID registry, yet? (was: RelaxNG question) - 8/19/2003 9:41:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Postel's Law Has No Exceptions - 8/19/2003 8:59:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Postel's Law Has No Exceptions - 8/19/2003 9:05:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Are we ready for the namespace ID registry, yet? (w as: RelaxNG question) - 8/19/2003 9:12:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Postel's Law Has No Exceptions - 8/19/2003 9:43:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Postel's Law Has No Exceptions - 8/20/2003 8:22:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] Are we ready for the namespace ID registry, yet? (w as: RelaxNG question) - 8/19/2003 9:47:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Are we ready for the namespace ID registry, yet? (w as: RelaxNG question) - 8/19/2003 10:03:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Are we ready for the namespace ID registry, yet? (w as: RelaxNG question) - 8/20/2003 5:06:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Are we ready for the namespace ID registry, yet? (was: RelaxNG question) - 8/20/2003 12:33:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] A standard approach to glueing together reusable XML fragments in prose? - 8/19/2003 10:07:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] A standard approach to glueing together reusable XML fragments in prose? - 8/22/2003 12:36:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Postel's Law Has No Exceptions - 8/19/2003 10:19:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Postel's Law Has No Exceptions - 8/19/2003 10:43:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Postel's Law Has No Exceptions - 8/20/2003 3:26:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Binary XML == "spawn of the devil" ? - 8/19/2003 10:32:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Binary XML == "spawn of the devil" ? - 8/19/2003 11:43:00 PM
CFP: XML Database Symposium (XSym03) @ VLDB 2003 - 8/20/2003 8:29:00 AM
XSLT 2.0 Processor = XSLT Processor + W3 XML Schema Validator - 8/20/2003 10:45:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] XSLT 2.0 Processor = XSLT Processor + W3 XML Schema Validator - 8/20/2003 12:20:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Binary XML == "spawn of the devil" ? - 8/20/2003 1:26:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Binary XML == "spawn of the devil" ? - 8/20/2003 2:53:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] A standard approach to glueing together reusable X ML fragments in prose? - 8/20/2003 1:26:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Postel's Law Has No Exceptions - 8/20/2003 2:01:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] A standard approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose? - 8/20/2003 2:51:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] RelaxNG question - 8/20/2003 3:46:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Are we ready for the namespace ID registry, yet? (w as: RelaxNG question) - 8/20/2003 4:27:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Are we ready for the namespace ID registry, yet? (w as: RelaxNG question) - 8/20/2003 5:54:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] A standard approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose? - 8/20/2003 4:28:00 PM
opposite of infoset - 8/20/2003 4:37:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] opposite of infoset - 8/20/2003 4:54:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] opposite of infoset - 8/20/2003 5:05:00 PM
Re: opposite of infoset - 8/20/2003 5:10:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] opposite of infoset - 8/20/2003 5:11:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] opposite of infoset - 8/20/2003 6:52:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] opposite of infoset - 8/20/2003 8:51:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Postel's Law Has No Exceptions - 8/20/2003 4:52:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Postel's Law Has No Exceptions - 8/20/2003 5:06:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Postel's Law Has No Exceptions - 8/24/2003 5:07:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] Are we ready for the namespace ID registry, yet? (w as: RelaxNG question) - 8/20/2003 4:53:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Are we ready for the namespace ID registry, yet? (was: RelaxNG question) - 8/20/2003 10:09:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] opposite of infoset - 8/20/2003 4:58:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Are we ready for the namespace ID registry, yet? (w as: RelaxNG question) - 8/20/2003 5:12:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] opposite of infoset - 8/20/2003 5:22:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Postel's Law Has No Exceptions - 8/20/2003 5:26:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Postel's Law Has No Exceptions - 8/20/2003 5:57:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Postel's Law Has No Exceptions - 8/21/2003 3:26:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Postel's Law Has No Exceptions - 8/20/2003 5:27:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Postel's Law Has No Exceptions - 8/20/2003 6:03:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Re: opposite of infoset - 8/20/2003 8:35:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] A standard approach to glueing together reusable X ML fragments in prose? - 8/20/2003 10:11:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Are we ready for the namespace ID registry, yet? (w as: RelaxNG question) - 8/21/2003 12:05:00 AM
Why does MSXML ignore encoding clause? - 8/21/2003 6:52:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] Why does MSXML ignore encoding clause? - 8/21/2003 7:10:00 AM
[ANN] XML Standards Library 2.0 : Updated 2003-08-21 - 8/21/2003 8:22:00 AM
ANN: Syntext Dtd2Xs v1.3 - Complex&Modularized XML DTD to XML SchemaConverter - 8/21/2003 10:14:00 AM
Schema validators - 8/21/2003 12:03:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Schema validators - 8/21/2003 12:35:00 PM
InkML - 8/21/2003 1:13:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] InkML - 8/21/2003 1:28:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] InkML - 8/21/2003 1:34:00 PM
Re: InkML - 8/22/2003 1:00:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Are we ready for the namespace ID registry, yet? (was: RelaxNG question) - 8/21/2003 1:16:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Are we ready for the namespace ID registry, yet? (was: RelaxNG question) - 8/21/2003 1:18:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] InkML - 8/21/2003 1:50:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] InkML - 8/21/2003 2:03:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] InkML - 8/21/2003 2:19:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] InkML - 8/21/2003 2:30:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] A standard approach to glueing together reusable X ML fragments in prose? - 8/21/2003 2:31:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] InkML - 8/21/2003 3:22:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] InkML - 8/21/2003 3:35:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] InkML - 8/21/2003 3:49:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] InkML - 8/21/2003 3:55:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] InkML - 8/21/2003 3:57:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] InkML - 8/21/2003 4:17:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] InkML - 8/21/2003 4:29:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] InkML - 8/21/2003 4:38:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] InkML - 8/21/2003 4:38:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Are we ready for the namespace ID registry, yet? (w as: RelaxNG question) - 8/21/2003 4:34:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Are we ready for the namespace ID registry, yet? (was: RelaxNG question) - 8/21/2003 4:40:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Are we ready for the namespace ID registry, yet? (w as: RelaxNG question) - 8/21/2003 4:39:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Are we ready for the namespace ID registry, yet? (was: RelaxNG question) - 8/21/2003 4:49:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Are we ready for the namespace ID registry, yet? (w as: RelaxNG question) - 8/21/2003 5:11:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Are we ready for the namespace ID registry, yet? (was: RelaxNG question) - 8/21/2003 5:14:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Are we ready for the namespace ID registry, yet? (w as: RelaxNG question) - 8/21/2003 5:31:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Are we ready for the namespace ID registry, yet? (was: RelaxNG question) - 8/21/2003 6:26:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] InkML - 8/21/2003 6:12:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] InkML - 8/21/2003 6:21:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] InkML - 8/21/2003 7:02:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] InkML - 8/21/2003 8:36:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Are we ready for the namespace ID registry, yet? (w as: RelaxNG question) - 8/21/2003 7:09:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Are we ready for the namespace ID registry, yet? (was: RelaxNG question) - 8/21/2003 7:13:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Are we ready for the namespace ID registry, yet? (w as: RelaxNG question) - 8/21/2003 7:28:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Are we ready for the namespace ID registry, yet? (was: RelaxNG question) - 8/21/2003 7:32:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Are we ready for the namespace ID registry, yet? (was: RelaxNG question) - 8/21/2003 10:30:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Are we ready for the namespace ID registry, yet? (w as: RelaxNG question) - 8/21/2003 7:52:00 PM
Open Letter to Web Services, Semantics, Semantic Web and Ontology Communities - 8/21/2003 10:36:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Beauty is in the eye of the beholder (was: Are we ready...) - 8/21/2003 10:50:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Beauty is in the eye of the beholder (was: Are we ready...) - 8/21/2003 11:04:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Overlapping namespaces (was: Are we ready ...) - 8/21/2003 11:14:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Overlapping namespaces (was: Are we ready ...) - 8/22/2003 12:13:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] Beauty is in the eye of the beholder (was: Are we r eady...) - 8/21/2003 11:31:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] A standard approach to glueing together reusable X ML fragments in prose? - 8/22/2003 12:04:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] Overlapping namespaces (was: Are we ready ...) - 8/22/2003 6:51:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] InkML - 8/22/2003 1:08:00 PM
Applying XML to Improve Patent Processes (WAS RE: [xml-dev] A standard approach to glueing together reusable X ML fragments in prose?) - 8/22/2003 1:28:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Applying XML to Improve Patent Processes (WAS RE: [xml-dev] A sta ndard approach to glueing together reusable X ML fragments in prose?) - 8/22/2003 4:22:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Overlapping namespaces (was: Are we ready ...) - 8/22/2003 4:31:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Applying XML to Improve Patent Processes (WAS RE: [xml-dev] A sta ndard approach to glueing together reusable X ML fragments in prose?) - 8/22/2003 5:25:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Applying XML to Improve Patent Processes (WAS RE: [ xml-dev] A sta ndard approach to glueing together reusable X ML fragment s in prose?) - 8/22/2003 6:43:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Applying XML to Improve Patent Processes (WAS RE: [ xml-dev] A sta ndard approach to glueing together reusable X ML fragment s in prose?) - 8/22/2003 6:49:00 PM
[ANN] XML Standards Library 2.0 : Updated 2003-08-25 - 8/25/2003 4:59:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] Re: XML CMM and ISO9000 compliance? - was A standard approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose? - 8/25/2003 2:47:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Re: XML CMM and ISO9000 compliance? - was A standar d approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose? - 8/25/2003 4:38:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] A standard approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose? - 8/25/2003 2:54:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] A standard approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose? - 8/25/2003 3:23:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] A standard approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose? - 8/25/2003 6:50:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] A standard approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose? - 8/25/2003 3:01:00 PM
XQuery updates and unnormalized data (RE: [xml-dev] A standard approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose?) - 8/25/2003 4:14:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] A standard approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose? - 8/25/2003 6:57:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] A standard approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose? - 8/25/2003 7:24:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] A standard approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose? - 8/26/2003 7:53:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] A standard approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose? - 8/26/2003 8:38:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] A standard approach to glueing together reusableXMLfragments in prose? - 8/26/2003 12:28:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] A standard approach to glueing together reusableXMLfragments in prose? - 8/26/2003 2:59:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] A standard approach to glueing together reusableXMLfragments in prose? - 8/26/2003 3:17:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] A standard approach to glueing together reusableXMLfragmentsin prose? - 8/26/2003 3:32:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] A standard approach to glueing together reusableXMLfragments in prose? - 8/26/2003 9:27:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] A standard approach to glueing together reusableXMLfragments in prose? - 8/26/2003 5:01:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] A standard approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose? - 8/26/2003 9:48:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] A standard approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose? - 8/26/2003 1:59:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] A standard approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose? - 8/26/2003 11:37:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] A standard approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose? - 8/25/2003 7:52:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] A standard approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose? - 8/26/2003 10:56:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] A standard approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose? - 8/25/2003 3:05:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] A standard approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose? - 8/25/2003 3:40:00 PM
Re: XML CMM and ISO9000 compliance? - was A standard approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose? - 8/25/2003 3:43:00 PM
XML CMM ISO9000 compliance? - was A standard approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose? - 8/25/2003 3:44:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] XML CMM ISO9000 compliance? - was A standard approachto glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose? - 8/26/2003 7:21:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] XML CMM ISO9000 compliance? - was A standard approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose? - 8/26/2003 11:37:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] XML CMM ISO9000 compliance? - was A standard approachto glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose? - 8/27/2003 6:34:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] A standard approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose? - 8/25/2003 4:05:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] A standard approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose? - 8/25/2003 4:08:00 PM
RE: XQuery updates and unnormalized data (RE: [xml-dev] A standard approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose?) - 8/25/2003 4:32:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] A standard approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose? - 8/25/2003 5:02:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Re: XML CMM and ISO9000 compliance? - was A standar d approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose? - 8/25/2003 5:12:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Re: XML CMM and ISO9000 compliance? - was A standar d approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose? - 8/26/2003 2:19:00 PM
[xml-dev] XML web programming using VB - 8/25/2003 5:40:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] XML CMM and ISO9000 compliance? - was A standard approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose? - 8/26/2003 1:41:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] XML web programming using VB - 8/26/2003 6:59:00 AM
XSLT and Schemas - 8/26/2003 11:25:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] XSLT and Schemas - 8/26/2003 11:37:00 AM
Billions and billions? - 8/26/2003 12:15:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Billions and billions? - 8/26/2003 12:51:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Billions and billions? - 8/26/2003 12:51:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] XML and the Relational Model (was Re: [xml-dev] A standard approach to glueing together ...) - 8/26/2003 2:19:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Re: XML CMM and ISO9000 compliance? - was A standar d approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose? - 8/26/2003 2:19:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Re: XML CMM and ISO9000 compliance? - was A standar d approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose? - 8/26/2003 2:58:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Re: XML CMM and ISO9000 compliance? - was A standar d approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose? - 8/26/2003 11:36:00 PM
Synopsis - An Open Letter to - 8/26/2003 3:00:00 PM
PHIL: Why The Web is Mediocre (WAS RE: [xml-dev] Re: XML CMM and ISO9000 compliance? - was A standar d approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose?) - 8/26/2003 3:07:00 PM
XPath brain teaser - 8/26/2003 4:26:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] XPath brain teaser - 8/26/2003 4:42:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] XPath brain teaser - 8/26/2003 4:49:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] XPath brain teaser - 8/26/2003 4:58:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] XPath brain teaser - 8/26/2003 10:07:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] A standard approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose? - 8/26/2003 5:09:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Re: XML and the Relational Model - 8/26/2003 5:32:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Re: XML and the Relational Model - 8/29/2003 3:20:00 AM
[ANNOUNCE] WYSIWYG XSL website editor .. - 8/26/2003 5:38:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] XPath brain teaser - 8/26/2003 5:55:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] XPath brain teaser - 8/26/2003 10:16:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] A standard approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose? - 8/26/2003 6:22:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] A standard approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose? - 8/26/2003 6:26:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] A standard approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose? - 8/26/2003 9:20:00 PM
Mondial: The CIA World Factbook in Oracle, XML, F-Logic, and Datalog - 8/26/2003 6:59:00 PM
XML.Net find node by content and change attribute - 8/26/2003 7:41:00 PM
Georgia State University Electronic Court Filing Project -- Lesson Learned III - 8/26/2003 7:52:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Georgia State University Electronic Court Filing Project -- Lesson Learned III - 8/26/2003 7:57:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Georgia State University Electronic Court Filing Project -- Lesson Learned III - 8/26/2003 8:16:00 PM
Final CFP: XML Database Symposium (XSym03) @ VLDB 2003 - 8/27/2003 8:52:00 AM
Namespace declaration and schema validation problems - 8/27/2003 9:18:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Namespace declaration and schema validation problems - 8/27/2003 10:58:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Namespace declaration and schema validation problems - 8/27/2003 1:06:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Namespace declaration and schema validation problems - 8/27/2003 4:58:00 PM
xml taxonomy - 8/27/2003 1:05:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] xml taxonomy - 8/27/2003 1:16:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] xml taxonomy - 8/28/2003 9:51:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] xml taxonomy - 8/28/2003 11:30:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] xml taxonomy - 8/28/2003 1:41:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] XML and the Relational Model (was Re: [xml-dev] A standard approach to glueing together ...) - 8/27/2003 1:08:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] xml taxonomy - 8/27/2003 1:28:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] xml taxonomy - 8/27/2003 3:38:00 PM
RE: xml taxonomy - 8/27/2003 1:39:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] XML CMM and ISO9000 compliance? - was A standard approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose? - 8/27/2003 2:52:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] XML CMM and ISO9000 compliance? - was A standard approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose? - 8/27/2003 6:12:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] XML and the Relational Model (was Re: [xml-dev] A standard approach to glueing together ...) - 8/27/2003 2:54:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] XML and the Relational Model (was Re: [xml-dev] A standard approach to glueing together ...) - 8/27/2003 10:57:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] XML and the Relational Model (was Re: [xml-dev] A standard approach to glueing together ...) - 8/27/2003 11:58:00 PM
The relational model is to data as automata theory is to programs? - 8/27/2003 3:27:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] xml taxonomy - 8/27/2003 3:36:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Namespace declaration and schema validation problems - 8/27/2003 4:04:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Need help on JAXB! - 8/27/2003 4:05:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Need help on JAXB! - 8/27/2003 5:24:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] XML.Net find node by content and change attribute - 8/27/2003 4:09:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] xml taxonomy - 8/27/2003 4:36:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] xml taxonomy - 8/27/2003 5:23:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] XML and the Relational Model (was Re: [xml-dev] A standard approach to glueing together ...) - 8/27/2003 5:46:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] XML and the Relational Model (was Re: [xml-dev] A standard approach to glueing together ...) - 8/27/2003 5:55:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] XML and the Relational Model (was Re: [xml-dev] A standard approach to glueing together ...) - 8/27/2003 6:13:00 PM
RE: G. Orwell (was: xml taxonomy) - 8/27/2003 6:09:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] XML and the Relational Model [long] - 8/27/2003 6:23:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] XML and the Relational Model [long] - 8/28/2003 12:17:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] XML CMM and ISO9000 compliance? - was A standard approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose? - 8/27/2003 6:31:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] XML CMM and ISO9000 compliance? - was A standard approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose? - 8/27/2003 6:31:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] XML and the Relational Model (was Re: [xml-dev] A standard approach to glueing together ...) - 8/27/2003 7:44:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] XML and the Relational Model (was Re: [xml-dev] A standard approach to glueing together ...) - 8/27/2003 7:57:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] XML and the Relational Model (was Re: [xml-dev] A standard approach to glueing together ...) - 8/28/2003 12:09:00 AM
XML mapping to java objects - 8/28/2003 8:47:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] A standard approach to glueing together reusableXML fragments in prose? - 8/28/2003 1:22:00 PM
Re: Question about UTF-8 - 8/28/2003 1:42:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] A standard approach to glueing together reusableXM L fragments in prose? - 8/28/2003 1:51:00 PM
Linking xml files together - 8/28/2003 2:24:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] XML and the Relational Model (was Re: [xml-dev] A standard approach to glueing together ...) - 8/28/2003 5:17:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] XML and the Relational Model [long] - 8/28/2003 5:24:00 PM
freeware command line toolkit for XML - 8/28/2003 10:41:00 PM
Announce: Public XSL training in Europe - September 22-26, 2003 - XML-Dev - 8/29/2003 2:39:00 AM
XML storage - 8/29/2003 8:08:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] XML storage - 8/29/2003 11:00:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] XML storage - 8/29/2003 2:27:00 PM
[OT] Who said the browser wasn't dead? - 8/29/2003 11:58:00 AM
XSLT and default namespaces - 8/29/2003 1:55:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] XSLT and default namespaces - 8/29/2003 2:10:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] [OT] Who said the browser wasn't dead? - 8/29/2003 2:07:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Question about UTF-8 - 8/29/2003 3:44:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Mixed Content - 8/29/2003 5:24:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Linking xml files together - 8/29/2003 5:43:00 PM
Avoiding roundoff errors in calculations? - 8/29/2003 6:40:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Avoiding roundoff errors in calculations? - 8/29/2003 7:36:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Avoiding roundoff errors in calculations? - 8/29/2003 8:31:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Avoiding roundoff errors in calculations? - 8/29/2003 8:58:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Avoiding roundoff errors in calculations? - 8/29/2003 9:13:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Avoiding roundoff errors in calculations? - 8/29/2003 9:27:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Avoiding roundoff errors in calculations? - 8/30/2003 2:15:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Avoiding roundoff errors in calculations? - 8/30/2003 3:20:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] Avoiding roundoff errors in calculations? - 8/29/2003 9:26:00 PM
[ANN] xmloperator 2.3 - 8/30/2003 3:16:00 PM
Native XML databases - 8/31/2003 3:16:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Native XML databases - 8/31/2003 3:39:00 PM

Disclaimer

These Archives are provided for informational purposes only and have been generated directly from the Altova mailing list archive system and are comprised of the lists set forth on www.altova.com/list/index.html. Therefore, Altova does not warrant or guarantee the accuracy, reliability, completeness, usefulness, non-infringement of intellectual property rights, or quality of any content on the Altova Mailing List Archive(s), regardless of who originates that content. You expressly understand and agree that you bear all risks associated with using or relying on that content. Altova will not be liable or responsible in any way for any content posted including, but not limited to, any errors or omissions in content, or for any losses or damage of any kind incurred as a result of the use of or reliance on any content. This disclaimer and limitation on liability is in addition to the disclaimers and limitations contained in the Website Terms of Use and elsewhere on the site.