Altova Mailing List Archives

xml-dev



Re: [xml-dev] Reporting XML validation results in XML: is this approach sensible? - 1/1/2003 5:43:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Reporting XML validation results in XML: is thisapproach sensible? - 1/3/2003 2:47:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Reporting XML validation results in XML: is this approach sensible? - 1/1/2003 10:23:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Reporting XML validation results in XML: is this approach sensible? - 1/1/2003 11:24:00 AM
WS-License - Searching for Spec - 1/2/2003 4:01:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] WS-License - Searching for Spec - 1/3/2003 1:09:00 AM
test post, please ignore - 1/2/2003 10:30:00 PM
XSL Template Match Fails - 1/3/2003 3:46:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] XSL Template Match Fails - 1/3/2003 4:00:00 PM
Wither 2003? - 1/3/2003 5:01:00 PM
[xml-dev] IBM's idea off an XML expert - 1/3/2003 7:07:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] IBM's idea off an XML expert - 1/3/2003 8:03:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] IBM's idea off an XML expert - 1/3/2003 10:05:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] IBM's idea off an XML expert - 1/3/2003 7:52:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] XSL Template Match Fails - 1/3/2003 5:39:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] XSL Template Match Fails - 1/3/2003 5:44:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] IBM's idea off an XML expert - 1/3/2003 9:01:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] IBM's idea off an XML expert - 1/3/2003 9:25:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] IBM's idea off an XML expert - 1/3/2003 9:26:00 PM
Identifying Data for Interchange [was: XML Components] - 1/4/2003 5:12:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Identifying Data for Interchange [was: XML Components] - 1/4/2003 7:43:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Identifying Data for Interchange [was: XML Components] - 1/4/2003 10:40:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Identifying Data for Interchange [was: XML Components] - 1/4/2003 10:54:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Identifying Data for Interchange [was: XML Components] - 1/4/2003 11:24:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Identifying Data for Interchange [was: XML Components] - 1/4/2003 11:49:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Identifying Data for Interchange [was: XML Components] - 1/5/2003 5:22:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Identifying Data for Interchange [was: XML Components] - 1/5/2003 5:33:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Identifying Data for Interchange [was: XML Components] - 1/5/2003 6:03:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Identifying Data for Interchange [was: XML Components] - 1/5/2003 6:45:00 PM
Questions on XML Schema "all" and RELAX NG "interleave" - 1/5/2003 10:23:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Questions on XML Schema "all" and RELAX NG "interleave" - 1/6/2003 4:02:00 AM
XML schema example. - 1/6/2003 6:23:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] XML schema example. - 1/6/2003 3:15:00 PM
Question of SAX Fileter - 1/6/2003 8:19:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] Identifying Data for Interchange [was: XML Components] - 1/6/2003 2:40:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] IBM's idea off an XML expert - 1/6/2003 3:03:00 PM
[ANN] Transmorpher 1.0 available - 1/6/2003 4:29:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Identifying Data for Interchange [was: XML Components] - 1/6/2003 4:54:00 PM
Microsoft ... is a vision for a new XML "language" ... calling X# - 1/6/2003 5:41:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Microsoft ... is a vision for a new XML "language" ...calling X# - 1/6/2003 5:56:00 PM
S-expressions vs. XML - 1/6/2003 7:58:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] S-expressions vs. XML - 1/6/2003 8:18:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] S-expressions vs. XML - 1/6/2003 8:30:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] S-expressions vs. XML - 1/7/2003 12:42:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] S-expressions vs. XML - 1/7/2003 12:49:00 AM
Still not the essence of XML (was Re: [xml-dev] S-expressions vs. XML) - 1/11/2003 8:37:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Still not the essence of XML (was Re: [xml-dev] S-expressions vs. XML) - 1/11/2003 10:29:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Still not the essence of XML (was Re: [xml-dev] S-expressions vs. XML) - 1/12/2003 5:55:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Microsoft ... is a vision for a new XML "language" ... calling X# - 1/6/2003 6:29:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Microsoft ... is a vision for a new XML "language" ... calling X# - 1/6/2003 8:17:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Microsoft ... is a vision for a new XML "language" ... calling X# - 1/6/2003 10:58:00 PM
SkunkLink: a skunkworks XML linking proposal - 1/6/2003 10:28:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] SkunkLink: a skunkworks XML linking proposal - 1/6/2003 11:50:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] SkunkLink: a skunkworks XML linking proposal - 1/8/2003 7:16:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] SkunkLink: a skunkworks XML linking proposal - 1/8/2003 7:24:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] SkunkLink: a skunkworks XML linking proposal - 1/9/2003 11:26:00 AM
XML schema/ DTD specified at runtime - 1/6/2003 11:09:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] SkunkLink: a skunkworks XML linking proposal - 1/6/2003 11:11:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Microsoft ... is a vision for a new XML "language" ... calling X# - 1/6/2003 11:19:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] SkunkLink: a skunkworks XML linking proposal - 1/7/2003 7:21:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] SkunkLink: a skunkworks XML linking proposal - 1/7/2003 12:49:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] SkunkLink: a skunkworks XML linking proposal - 1/7/2003 5:13:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] SkunkLink: a skunkworks XML linking proposal - 1/7/2003 7:32:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] SkunkLink: a skunkworks XML linking proposal - 1/7/2003 1:58:00 PM
XSL INCLUDE PROBLEM - 1/7/2003 9:58:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] XSL INCLUDE PROBLEM - 1/7/2003 12:37:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] XSL INCLUDE PROBLEM - 1/7/2003 12:54:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] SkunkLink: a skunkworks XML linking proposal - 1/7/2003 2:19:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] SkunkLink: a skunkworks XML linking proposal - 1/7/2003 2:43:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] SkunkLink: a skunkworks XML linking proposal - 1/7/2003 2:52:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] SkunkLink: a skunkworks XML linking proposal - 1/7/2003 3:04:00 PM
Round 2: Identifying Data for Interchange - 1/7/2003 4:25:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Round 2: Identifying Data for Interchange - 1/7/2003 4:46:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Round 2: Identifying Data for Interchange - 1/7/2003 6:25:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Round 2: Identifying Data for Interchange - 1/7/2003 10:14:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Round 2: Identifying Data for Interchange - 1/8/2003 12:32:00 AM
the xml: namespace - 1/7/2003 5:02:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] the xml: namespace - 1/7/2003 6:39:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] the xml: namespace - 1/7/2003 6:53:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] the xml: namespace - 1/7/2003 7:04:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] SkunkLink: a skunkworks XML linking proposal - 1/7/2003 5:27:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] SkunkLink: a skunkworks XML linking proposal - 1/9/2003 4:47:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] the xml: namespace - 1/7/2003 7:08:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] ANN: XML Schema of measurement units - 1/7/2003 7:12:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Round 2: Identifying Data for Interchange - 1/8/2003 12:25:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] Round 2: Identifying Data for Interchange - 1/11/2003 12:39:00 AM
can we load xsl as a string in xmldom.... - 1/8/2003 6:56:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] can we load xsl as a string in xmldom.... - 1/8/2003 7:16:00 PM
[SAX] How to keep entities unresolved in the result ? - 1/8/2003 8:06:00 AM
[ANN/OT] xreporter 1.0 release - XML/XSLT-based database reporting - 1/8/2003 10:20:00 AM
Panel Named to Develop Voluntary File Format for Accessible Digital Instructional Materials - 1/8/2003 2:30:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Panel Named to Develop Voluntary File Format for Accessible Digital Instructional Materials - 1/8/2003 2:39:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Panel Named to Develop Voluntary File Format for Accessible Digital Instructional Materials - 1/8/2003 2:49:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Panel Named to Develop Voluntary File Format for Accessible Digital Instructional Materials - 1/8/2003 6:45:00 PM
Check out apxl - 1/8/2003 8:24:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Check out apxl - 1/8/2003 8:28:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Check out apxl - 1/8/2003 8:57:00 PM
Announce: Upcoming XSLT and XSL-FO training North America and Europe (XML Dev) - 1/8/2003 8:26:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] S-expressions vs. XML - 1/9/2003 2:49:00 AM
XML Schema Validation Problem - 1/9/2003 10:45:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] XML Schema Validation Problem - 1/9/2003 11:04:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] XML Schema Validation Problem - 1/9/2003 11:25:00 AM
Namespace Selection using SelectionNamespaces property - 1/9/2003 12:50:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Namespace Selection using SelectionNamespaces property - 1/9/2003 1:02:00 PM
[xml-dev] Namespace Selection using SelectionNamespaces property - 1/9/2003 1:04:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] SkunkLink: a skunkworks XML linking proposal - 1/9/2003 2:12:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] ANN: Distributed Registry for Web Services - 1/9/2003 4:13:00 PM
FW: List of XML Users Groups - 1/9/2003 6:00:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] SkunkLink: a skunkworks XML linking proposal - 1/9/2003 9:28:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] ANN: Distributed Registry for Web Services - 1/9/2003 11:05:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Keep XML parser from eating linefeed in element data ?? - 1/10/2003 1:17:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Keep XML parser from eating linefeed in elementdata ?? - 1/10/2003 3:43:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Keep XML parser from eating linefeed in element data ?? - 1/10/2003 4:54:00 AM
OASIS TC Call for Participation: Emergency Management TC - 1/10/2003 2:02:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Keep XML parser from eating linefeed in elementdata ?? - 1/10/2003 2:49:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Keep XML parser from eating linefeed in element data ?? - 1/10/2003 2:54:00 PM
critique: Outsider's Guide to the W3C - 1/10/2003 4:49:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] critique: Outsider's Guide to the W3C - 1/10/2003 5:41:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] critique: Outsider's Guide to the W3C - 1/10/2003 5:32:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] critique: Outsider's Guide to the W3C - 1/10/2003 5:58:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] critique: Outsider's Guide to the W3C - 1/10/2003 5:34:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] critique: Outsider's Guide to the W3C - 1/10/2003 5:50:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Keep XML parser from eating linefeed in elementdata ?? - 1/10/2003 6:32:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Keep XML parser from eating linefeed in element data ?? - 1/10/2003 6:51:00 PM
Invitation to a Technology Preview for Sun ONE Integration Server, Secure Trading Agent - 1/10/2003 8:41:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Round 2: Identifying Data for Interchange - 1/11/2003 1:16:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] Still not the essence of XML (was Re: [xml-dev] S-expressions vs. XML) - 1/11/2003 7:09:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Still not the essence of XML (was Re: [xml-dev] S-expressionsvs. XML) - 1/11/2003 10:05:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Still not the essence of XML (was Re: [xml-dev] S-expressions vs. XML) - 1/12/2003 6:44:00 AM
Famous web services with apparent serious XML schema errors - 1/12/2003 12:41:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Famous web services with apparent serious XML schemaerrors - 1/12/2003 1:26:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Famous web services with apparent serious XML schema errors - 1/12/2003 2:33:00 AM
ANN: Outsider's Guide to the W3C (revised) - 1/12/2003 9:47:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Still not the essence of XML (was Re: [xml-dev] S-expressions vs. XML) - 1/13/2003 4:54:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] Still not the essence of XML (was Re: [xml-dev] S-expressions vs. XML) - 1/13/2003 2:35:00 PM
XSLT for desktop applications - 1/13/2003 4:59:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] XSLT for desktop applications - 1/13/2003 6:19:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] XSLT for desktop applications - 1/13/2003 10:21:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] XSLT for desktop applications - 1/13/2003 9:22:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] XSLT for desktop applications - 1/13/2003 9:45:00 AM
Instrument DTD - 1/13/2003 9:28:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] Instrument DTD - 1/13/2003 9:47:00 AM
Jpeg's and the PDF Serializer - 1/13/2003 10:15:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Jpeg's and the PDF Serializer - 1/13/2003 10:51:00 AM
XML is not extensible - 1/13/2003 10:30:00 AM
RE: [XML-dev] Instrument DTD - 1/13/2003 1:29:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Still not the essence of XML (was Re: [xml-dev] S-expressions vs. XML) - 1/13/2003 2:49:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Still not the essence of XML (was Re: [xml-dev] S-e xpressions vs. XML) - 1/13/2003 4:03:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Still not the essence of XML (was Re: [xml-dev] S-e xpressions vs. XML) - 1/13/2003 4:35:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Still not the essence of XML (was Re: [xml-dev] S-expressions vs. XML) - 1/13/2003 7:51:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Still not the essence of XML (was Re: [xml-dev] S-expressions vs. XML) - 1/13/2003 8:35:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Still not the essence of XML (was Re: [xml-dev] S-e xpressions vs. XML) - 1/13/2003 8:45:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Still not the essence of XML (was Re: [xml-dev] S-e xpressions vs. XML) - 1/13/2003 9:49:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Still not the essence of XML (was Re: [xml-dev] S-e xpressions vs. XML) - 1/13/2003 10:06:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Still not the essence of XML (was Re: [xml-dev] S-e xpressions vs. XML) - 1/13/2003 10:37:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Still not the essence of XML (was Re: [xml-dev] S-e xpressions vs. XML) - 1/13/2003 10:55:00 PM
Request for XML-based Content Management System Recommendation - 1/13/2003 10:56:00 PM
Seeking advice on handling large industry-standard XML data models [long] - 1/13/2003 11:08:00 PM
XPath validation against a schema rather that against an instance - 1/14/2003 7:49:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] XPath validation against a schema rather that against an instance - 1/14/2003 4:01:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] XPath validation against a schema rather that against an instance - 1/16/2003 11:13:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] XPath validation against a schema rather that against an instance - 1/16/2003 3:19:00 PM
New STX working draft - 1/14/2003 11:29:00 AM
namespaces & xslt newbie question - 1/14/2003 3:21:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] namespaces & xslt newbie question - 1/14/2003 3:31:00 PM
SVG 1.1 and SVG Mobile are W3C Recommendations. - 1/14/2003 4:07:00 PM
OT: The Jeanie Johnston Sails - 1/14/2003 4:40:00 PM
linkbase brainstorming - 1/14/2003 6:11:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] linkbase brainstorming - 1/15/2003 3:54:00 PM
Poll (was: Seeking advice on handling large industry-standard XML data models) - 1/14/2003 9:41:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Poll (was: Seeking advice on handling large industry-standard XML data models) - 1/14/2003 10:51:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Poll (was: Seeking advice on handling large industry-standard XML data models) - 1/14/2003 9:43:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] XPath validation against a schema rather that against an instance - 1/14/2003 9:45:00 PM
RE: Poll (was: Seeking advice on handling large industry-standard XML data models) - 1/14/2003 9:55:00 PM
RE: Poll (was: Seeking advice on handling large industry-standard XML data models) - 1/14/2003 10:07:00 PM
Voting closed: Do you want datatyping in the XML core? - 1/14/2003 11:07:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Voting closed: Do you want datatyping in the XML core? - 1/15/2003 1:58:00 AM
RE: Poll (was: Seeking advice on handling large industry-standard XML data models) - 1/14/2003 11:39:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] RE: Poll (was: Seeking advice on handling large industry-standard XML data models) - 1/15/2003 12:05:00 AM
ANN: TM4J 0.8.0 - 1/15/2003 9:02:00 AM
Contained XML tag won't display - 1/15/2003 10:50:00 AM
How to handle multi lingual capability - 1/15/2003 10:58:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] How to handle multi lingual capability - 1/15/2003 3:46:00 PM
XML as generic villain - 1/15/2003 1:05:00 PM
re: [xml-dev] XML as generic villain - 1/15/2003 3:36:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] XML as generic villain - 1/15/2003 6:21:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] XML as generic villain - 1/15/2003 7:03:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] XML as generic villain - 1/16/2003 8:55:00 AM
Encoding Problem - 1/15/2003 1:11:00 PM
Java and XML email lists/groups - 1/15/2003 4:28:00 PM
namespace URI references - 1/15/2003 4:44:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] namespace URI references - 1/15/2003 4:55:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] namespace URI references - 1/15/2003 5:00:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] namespace URI references - 1/15/2003 5:15:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] namespace URI references - 1/15/2003 7:25:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Contained XML tag won't display - 1/15/2003 9:34:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Contained XML tag won't display - 1/16/2003 7:49:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Contained XML tag won't display - 1/16/2003 7:49:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Contained XML tag won't display - 1/16/2003 7:50:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Contained XML tag won't display - 1/16/2003 7:50:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Contained XML tag won't display - 1/16/2003 7:50:00 AM
ANN: SAX2 support for NanoXML - 1/16/2003 5:00:00 AM
xml parser 4.0 error - 1/16/2003 6:30:00 AM
ANN: eXist 0.9 - 1/16/2003 1:41:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] xml parser 4.0 error - 1/16/2003 2:29:00 PM
Adam Bosworth Article - what does "direct access" mean? - 1/16/2003 2:55:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Adam Bosworth Article - what does "direct access" mean? - 1/16/2003 3:42:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Adam Bosworth Article - what does "direct access" mean? - 1/16/2003 3:17:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Adam Bosworth Article - what does "direct access" mean? - 1/16/2003 3:50:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Adam Bosworth Article - what does "direct access" m ean? - 1/16/2003 3:57:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Adam Bosworth Article - what does "directaccess" m ean? - 1/16/2003 4:13:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Adam Bosworth Article - what does "directaccess" mean? - 1/16/2003 4:33:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Adam Bosworth Article - what does "directaccess" m ean? - 1/17/2003 8:59:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Adam Bosworth Article - what does "directaccess" mean? - 1/17/2003 9:27:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Adam Bosworth Article - what does "directaccess"m ean? - 1/17/2003 9:29:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Adam Bosworth Article - what does "direct access" mean? - 1/16/2003 3:53:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Adam Bosworth Article - what does "direct access" mean? - 1/16/2003 4:06:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Adam Bosworth Article - what does "direct access" mean? - 1/16/2003 3:57:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Adam Bosworth Article - what does "direct access" mean? - 1/16/2003 4:15:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Adam Bosworth Article - what does "direct access" m ean? - 1/16/2003 4:16:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Adam Bosworth Article - what does "direct access" m ean? - 1/16/2003 4:23:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Adam Bosworth Article - what does "direct access" m ean? - 1/16/2003 4:44:00 PM
subsetting XML - 1/16/2003 4:24:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Adam Bosworth Article - what does "direct access" mean? - 1/16/2003 5:15:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Adam Bosworth Article - what does "direct access" mean? - 1/16/2003 5:21:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Adam Bosworth Article - what does "direct access" mean? - 1/16/2003 5:26:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Adam Bosworth Article - what does "direct access" mean? - 1/17/2003 5:03:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] Adam Bosworth Article - what does "direct access" mean? - 1/16/2003 5:54:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Adam Bosworth Article - what does "direct access" mean? - 1/16/2003 6:48:00 PM
more patent fun - 1/16/2003 6:42:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] more patent fun - 1/16/2003 6:55:00 PM
Facts to Support RAND? was: Re: [xml-dev] more patent fun - 1/16/2003 8:05:00 PM
ANN: xml-hypertext mailing list - 1/16/2003 7:05:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Adam Bosworth Article - what does "direct access" mean? - 1/16/2003 7:09:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Adam Bosworth Article - what does "direct access" mean? - 1/16/2003 7:25:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Adam Bosworth Article - what does "direct access" mean? - 1/16/2003 7:46:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Adam Bosworth Article - what does "direct access" mean? - 1/16/2003 7:58:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Adam Bosworth Article - what does "direct access" mean? - 1/16/2003 8:04:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Adam Bosworth Article - what does "direct access" mean? - 1/16/2003 8:21:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Adam Bosworth Article - what does "direct access" mean? - 1/16/2003 7:18:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Adam Bosworth Article - what does "direct access" mean? - 1/16/2003 7:29:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Adam Bosworth Article - what does "direct access"mean? - 1/16/2003 10:01:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Adam Bosworth Article - what does "direct access" mean? - 1/16/2003 7:32:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Facts to Support RAND? was: Re: [xml-dev] more patent fun - 1/16/2003 9:43:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Facts to Support RAND? was: Re: [xml-dev] more pate nt fun - 1/16/2003 11:02:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Facts to Support RAND? was: Re: [xml-dev] more patent fun - 1/17/2003 2:36:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] Contained XML tag won't display - 1/16/2003 9:59:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Adam Bosworth Article - what does "direct access" mean? - 1/16/2003 10:12:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Adam Bosworth Article - what does "direct access" mean? - 1/16/2003 10:39:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Adam Bosworth Article - what does "direct access" mean? - 1/17/2003 12:56:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Adam Bosworth Article - what does "direct access" mean? - 1/17/2003 1:55:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Adam Bosworth Article - what does "direct access" mean? - 1/17/2003 2:15:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Adam Bosworth Article - what does "direct access" mean? - 1/17/2003 1:31:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Facts to Support RAND? was: Re: [xml-dev] more patent fun - 1/17/2003 2:44:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Facts to Support RAND? was: Re: [xml-dev] more patent fun - 1/17/2003 2:56:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Facts to Support RAND? was: Re: [xml-dev] more patent fun - 1/17/2003 5:27:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Facts to Support RAND? was: Re: [xml-dev] more patent fun - 1/17/2003 6:14:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Facts to Support RAND? was: Re: [xml-dev] more pate nt fun - 1/17/2003 9:21:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Facts to Support RAND? was: Re: [xml-dev] more pate nt fun - 1/17/2003 9:50:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Facts to Support RAND? was: Re: [xml-dev] more pate nt fun - 1/18/2003 5:19:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Facts to Support RAND? was: Re: [xml-dev] more pate nt fun - 1/18/2003 6:02:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Facts to Support RAND? was: Re: [xml-dev] more pate nt fun - 1/19/2003 6:19:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Facts to Support RAND? was: Re: [xml-dev] more patent fun - 1/19/2003 7:10:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] Adam Bosworth Article - what does "direct access" m ean? - 1/17/2003 2:53:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Adam Bosworth Article - what does "direct access" m ean? - 1/17/2003 3:49:00 PM
XML Schema for Sustainability - 1/17/2003 2:59:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] XML Schema for Sustainability - 1/20/2003 1:27:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Facts to Support RAND? was: Re: [xml-dev] more pate nt fun - 1/17/2003 3:08:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Facts to Support RAND? was: Re: [xml-dev] more pate nt fun - 1/17/2003 4:48:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Facts to Support RAND? was: Re: [xml-dev] more pate nt fun - 1/17/2003 5:45:00 PM
ConciseXML syntax - 1/17/2003 5:07:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] ConciseXML syntax - 1/17/2003 5:24:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] ConciseXML syntax - 1/17/2003 5:31:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] ConciseXML syntax - 1/17/2003 5:37:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] ConciseXML syntax - 1/17/2003 5:44:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] ConciseXML syntax and compatibility - 1/17/2003 5:57:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] ConciseXML syntax and compatibility - 1/17/2003 8:29:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] ConciseXML syntax and compatibility - 1/17/2003 11:30:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] ConciseXML syntax and compatibility - 1/17/2003 6:33:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] ConciseXML syntax - 1/17/2003 7:11:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] ConciseXML syntax - 1/17/2003 7:23:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] ConciseXML syntax - 1/17/2003 8:38:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] ConciseXML syntax - 1/17/2003 8:31:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] ConciseXML syntax - 1/17/2003 8:35:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] ConciseXML syntax and compatibility - 1/17/2003 9:27:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] ConciseXML syntax and compatibility - 1/19/2003 8:30:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] ConciseXML syntax and compatibility - 1/20/2003 3:04:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] ConciseXML syntax and compatibility - 1/20/2003 3:07:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] ConciseXML syntax and compatibility - 1/17/2003 9:37:00 PM
Re: ConciseXML syntax - 1/17/2003 11:49:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] ConciseXML syntax - 1/17/2003 6:25:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] ConciseXML syntax - 1/17/2003 6:44:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] ConciseXML syntax - 1/17/2003 7:51:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] ConciseXML syntax - 1/18/2003 5:05:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] ConciseXML syntax - 1/19/2003 8:51:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] ConciseXML syntax - 1/19/2003 9:01:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] ConciseXML syntax - 1/17/2003 5:11:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] ConciseXML syntax - 1/17/2003 5:35:00 PM
Sorry to send everyone an email, but... - 1/17/2003 5:55:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] ConciseXML syntax and compatibility - 1/17/2003 6:10:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Facts to Support RAND? was: Re: [xml-dev] more pate nt fun - 1/17/2003 6:28:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Facts to Support RAND? was: Re: [xml-dev] more pate nt fun - 1/17/2003 6:35:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Facts to Support RAND? was: Re: [xml-dev] more pate nt fun - 1/17/2003 6:41:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Facts to Support RAND? was: Re: [xml-dev] more pate nt fun - 1/17/2003 6:52:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Facts to Support RAND? was: Re: [xml-dev] more pate nt fun - 1/17/2003 9:21:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] ConciseXML syntax and compatibility - 1/17/2003 6:54:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Facts to Support RAND? was: Re: [xml-dev] more pate nt fun - 1/17/2003 6:58:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Facts to Support RAND? was: Re: [xml-dev] more pate nt fun - 1/17/2003 7:08:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Adam Bosworth Article - what does "direct access" m ean? - 1/17/2003 7:16:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] ConciseXML syntax - 1/17/2003 7:33:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] ConciseXML syntax - 1/17/2003 7:53:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] ConciseXML syntax - 1/17/2003 8:04:00 PM
Adam Bosworth meets ConciseXML syntax (was two extremely similar threads...) - 1/17/2003 8:12:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] ConciseXML syntax - 1/17/2003 8:29:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Adam Bosworth meets ConciseXML syntax (was two extremely similar threads...) - 1/17/2003 8:17:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Adam Bosworth meets ConciseXML syntax (was two extremely similar threads...) - 1/17/2003 8:24:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] ConciseXML syntax - 1/17/2003 8:32:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] ConciseXML syntax - 1/17/2003 8:43:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] ConciseXML syntax - 1/18/2003 4:58:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] ConciseXML syntax - 1/17/2003 8:47:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] ConciseXML syntax - 1/17/2003 8:59:00 PM
ConciseXML rationale - 1/17/2003 8:50:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] ConciseXML rationale - 1/17/2003 9:53:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] ConciseXML rationale - 1/18/2003 5:16:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] ConciseXML rationale and Scheme - 1/18/2003 9:07:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] ConciseXML rationale and Scheme - 1/20/2003 4:50:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] ConciseXML syntax - 1/17/2003 9:05:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] ConciseXML rationale - 1/17/2003 9:06:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] ConciseXML syntax - 1/17/2003 9:12:00 PM
RFP for OASIS Registry - 1/17/2003 9:24:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Facts to Support RAND? was: Re: [xml-dev] more pate nt fun - 1/17/2003 9:34:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Facts to Support RAND? was: Re: [xml-dev] more pate nt fun - 1/18/2003 1:45:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] Facts to Support RAND? was: Re: [xml-dev] more pate nt fun - 1/17/2003 9:39:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Facts to Support RAND? was: Re: [xml-dev] more pate nt fun - 1/17/2003 9:58:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Still not the essence of XML (was Re: [xml-dev] S-e xpressions vs. XML) - 1/18/2003 1:42:00 AM
Test. Ignore. - 1/18/2003 1:50:00 AM
Infoset of RFC2396 syntax - 1/18/2003 2:24:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] Infoset of RFC2396 syntax - 1/20/2003 8:46:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] ConciseXML syntax - 1/18/2003 5:23:00 AM
Which next step for examplotron? - 1/18/2003 9:34:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Which next step for examplotron? - 1/19/2003 6:14:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Which next step for examplotron? - 1/20/2003 7:48:00 AM
Some thoughts on 'direct access' to XML (long) - 1/18/2003 10:59:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Some thoughts on 'direct access' to XML (long) - 1/18/2003 11:55:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Some thoughts on 'direct access' to XML (long) - 1/18/2003 3:50:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Some thoughts on 'direct access' to XML (long) - 1/18/2003 4:58:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Some thoughts on 'direct access' to XML (long) - 1/18/2003 6:00:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Some thoughts on 'direct access' to XML (long) - 1/18/2003 6:34:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Some thoughts on 'direct access' to XML (long) - 1/20/2003 10:56:00 AM
Review of XML Schemas datatypes - 1/20/2003 11:38:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] ConciseXML syntax (some examples) - 1/18/2003 8:14:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] ConciseXML syntax (some examples) - 1/18/2003 8:29:00 PM
Water Type and Water Contract - 1/18/2003 8:40:00 PM
1-to-many HTML links, prototyped - 1/18/2003 11:41:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] 1-to-many HTML links, prototyped - 1/19/2003 12:33:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] 1-to-many HTML links, prototyped - 1/19/2003 7:40:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] 1-to-many HTML links, prototyped - 1/19/2003 9:42:00 PM
Re: [xml-h] 1-to-many HTML links, prototyped - 1/19/2003 10:29:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Re: [xml-h] 1-to-many HTML links, prototyped - 1/19/2003 11:47:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Re: [xml-h] 1-to-many HTML links, prototyped - 1/20/2003 12:16:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Re: [xml-h] 1-to-many HTML links, prototyped - 1/20/2003 1:32:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Re: [xml-h] 1-to-many HTML links, prototyped - 1/20/2003 3:18:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Re: [xml-h] 1-to-many HTML links, prototyped - 1/20/2003 4:07:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Re: [xml-h] 1-to-many HTML links, prototyped - 1/20/2003 2:56:00 PM
escaping QName interlopers - 1/19/2003 4:43:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] escaping QName interlopers - 1/22/2003 7:04:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] escaping QName interlopers - 1/22/2003 8:22:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] escaping QName interlopers - 1/23/2003 3:55:00 AM
ConciseXML arguments - 1/19/2003 5:49:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] ConciseXML arguments - 1/19/2003 6:08:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] ConciseXML arguments - 1/19/2003 8:49:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] ConciseXML arguments - 1/20/2003 2:53:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] ConciseXML arguments - 1/20/2003 3:09:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] ConciseXML arguments - 1/21/2003 12:59:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] ConciseXML arguments - 1/19/2003 6:02:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] ConciseXML arguments - 1/19/2003 6:19:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] ConciseXML arguments - 1/19/2003 9:02:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] ConciseXML arguments - 1/19/2003 6:04:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] ConciseXML arguments - 1/19/2003 6:29:00 PM
XML and ConciseXML - 1/19/2003 6:44:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] XML and ConciseXML - 1/19/2003 6:53:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] XML and ConciseXML - 1/19/2003 7:43:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] XML and ConciseXML - 1/19/2003 8:40:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] XML and ConciseXML - 1/19/2003 9:21:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] XML and ConciseXML - 1/20/2003 9:35:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Adam Bosworth Article - what does "directaccess"m ean? - 1/19/2003 6:44:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] XML and ConciseXML - 1/19/2003 6:57:00 PM
[xml-dev] WebServices disagreements - 1/19/2003 8:59:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] ConciseXML arguments - 1/19/2003 8:52:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] ConciseXML arguments - 1/19/2003 9:36:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] WebServices disagreements - 1/19/2003 9:28:00 PM
Will somebody please mention Hitler? - 1/20/2003 1:38:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Will somebody please mention Hitler? - 1/20/2003 2:15:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Will somebody please mention Hitler? - 1/20/2003 2:59:00 AM
Element content - 1/20/2003 8:03:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Element content - 1/20/2003 8:23:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Element content - 1/20/2003 8:31:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Element content - 1/20/2003 11:44:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] Element content - 1/20/2003 1:00:00 PM
How to parse DTD/SCHEMA files to DOM tree? - 1/21/2003 3:36:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Will somebody please mention Hitler? - 1/20/2003 10:56:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Will somebody please mention Hitler? - 1/20/2003 2:34:00 PM
XML Repository Software and publishing standards - 1/20/2003 12:11:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] XML Repository Software and publishing standards - 1/20/2003 1:32:00 PM
XSL Tranformation Error , plz help - 1/20/2003 12:15:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] XSL Tranformation Error , plz help - 1/20/2003 1:05:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] XSL Tranformation Error , plz help - 1/20/2003 12:24:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Further Clarification - XML Repository Software andpublishing standards - 1/20/2003 12:30:00 PM
Can XML Schemas do this? - 1/20/2003 2:43:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Can XML Schemas do this? - 1/20/2003 2:51:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Can XML Schemas do this? - 1/20/2003 3:09:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Can XML Schemas do this? - 1/20/2003 4:14:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Can XML Schemas do this? - 1/20/2003 4:55:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Can XML Schemas do this? - 1/20/2003 5:07:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Can XML Schemas do this? - 1/20/2003 5:50:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Can XML Schemas do this? - 1/20/2003 8:26:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Can XML Schemas do this? - 1/20/2003 9:40:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Can XML Schemas do this? - 1/20/2003 9:47:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Can XML Schemas do this? - 1/21/2003 12:43:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Can XML Schemas do this? - 1/21/2003 1:03:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Can XML Schemas do this? - 1/21/2003 2:45:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] ConciseXML arguments - 1/20/2003 3:00:00 PM
Software Development 2003 East Call for Papers - 1/20/2003 5:05:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] XML Repository Software and publishing standards - 1/20/2003 6:22:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Can XML Schemas do this? - 1/20/2003 6:31:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Can XML Schemas do this? - 1/20/2003 7:40:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Can XML Schemas do this? - 1/20/2003 6:37:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Will somebody please mention Hitler? - 1/20/2003 6:45:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Element content - 1/20/2003 7:21:00 PM
Castor 0.9.4.2 released - 1/20/2003 8:07:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Can XML Schemas do this? - 1/20/2003 8:43:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Can XML Schemas do this? - 1/20/2003 10:04:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Can XML Schemas do this? - 1/20/2003 10:11:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Can XML Schemas do this? - 1/21/2003 3:26:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Can XML Schemas do this? - 1/21/2003 4:55:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Can XML Schemas do this? - 1/21/2003 5:39:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Can XML Schemas do this? - 1/21/2003 5:41:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Can XML Schemas do this? - 1/21/2003 5:15:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Can XML Schemas do this? - 1/21/2003 5:50:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Can XML Schemas do this? - 1/21/2003 6:34:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Can XML Schemas do this? - 1/21/2003 5:26:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Can XML Schemas do this? - 1/21/2003 5:51:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Can XML Schemas do this? - 1/21/2003 5:54:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Can XML Schemas do this? - 1/21/2003 5:57:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Can XML Schemas do this? - 1/21/2003 6:59:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Can XML Schemas do this? - 1/21/2003 7:17:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Can XML Schemas do this? - 1/21/2003 7:30:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Can XML Schemas do this? - 1/21/2003 6:01:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Can XML Schemas do this? - 1/21/2003 5:53:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Can XML Schemas do this? - 1/21/2003 2:17:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Can XML Schemas do this? - 1/21/2003 6:59:00 PM
Which XML Processor is behaving correctly. - 1/20/2003 10:39:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Which XML Processor is behaving correctly. - 1/21/2003 12:30:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] problem with #&233; characters and such in URL - 1/21/2003 1:33:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] problem with #&233; characters and such in URL - 1/21/2003 10:34:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] problem with #&233; characters and such in URL - 1/21/2003 2:50:00 AM
thankx Joe Fawcett , i really worked :) - 1/21/2003 5:24:00 AM
OT: adobe svg plugin namespacing problem - 1/21/2003 10:54:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] OT: adobe svg plugin namespacing problem - 1/21/2003 12:35:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] problem with #&233; characters and such in URL - 1/21/2003 11:22:00 AM
Including other DTDs - 1/21/2003 12:31:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Including other DTDs - 1/21/2003 5:47:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Including other DTDs - 1/22/2003 9:32:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Including other DTDs - 1/22/2003 9:57:00 AM
XML Catalogs and Public Ids - 1/21/2003 1:16:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] XML Catalogs and Public Ids - 1/21/2003 3:56:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] problem with #&233; characters and such in URL - 1/21/2003 2:30:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Can XML Schemas do this? - 1/21/2003 6:14:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Can XML Schemas do this? - 1/21/2003 6:30:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Can XML Schemas do this? - 1/21/2003 6:32:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Can XML Schemas do this? - 1/22/2003 5:59:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] Can XML Schemas do this? - 1/21/2003 6:27:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Can XML Schemas do this? - 1/21/2003 6:53:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Can XML Schemas do this? - 1/21/2003 7:22:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Can XML Schemas do this? - 1/21/2003 7:56:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Can XML Schemas do this? - 1/21/2003 8:46:00 PM
FW: [xml-dev] Can XML Schemas do this? - 1/21/2003 7:52:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Can XML Schemas do this? - 1/21/2003 8:08:00 PM
Validating stylesheet - 1/21/2003 8:40:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Validating stylesheet - 1/21/2003 9:04:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Validating stylesheet - 1/24/2003 9:10:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] Validating stylesheet - 1/24/2003 10:07:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Can XML Schemas do this? - 1/21/2003 9:04:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Can XML Schemas do this? - 1/21/2003 9:10:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Can XML Schemas do this? - 1/21/2003 9:33:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Can XML Schemas do this? - 1/21/2003 10:02:00 PM
[ANN:] XMLwriter 2.0 XML Editor Is Released - 1/22/2003 4:40:00 AM
DTD for print reports - 1/22/2003 8:20:00 AM
ANN: Trang (multi-format schema converter) - 1/22/2003 11:44:00 AM
What are the different schema languages? - 1/22/2003 5:13:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] What are the different schema languages? - 1/22/2003 5:55:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] ANN: Trang (multi-format schema converter) - 1/22/2003 7:14:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] ANN: Trang (multi-format schema converter) - 1/22/2003 10:49:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] ANN: Trang (multi-format schema converter) - 1/23/2003 3:48:00 AM
PLEASE REMOVE ME FROM THE MAILING LIST..... - 1/22/2003 5:16:00 PM
OSCON Call For Participation - 1/22/2003 5:37:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] OSCON Call For Participation - 1/22/2003 5:42:00 PM
Dumb question about XML chars vs. Unicode - 1/23/2003 5:18:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Dumb question about XML chars vs. Unicode - 1/23/2003 11:26:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Dumb question about XML chars vs. Unicode - 1/25/2003 6:04:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Dumb question about XML chars vs. Unicode - 1/29/2003 2:39:00 PM
Duplicate namespace prefixes - 1/23/2003 9:48:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] Duplicate namespace prefixes - 1/23/2003 10:18:00 AM
Use of ID attribute types. - 1/23/2003 4:01:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Use of ID attribute types. - 1/23/2003 4:25:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Facts to Support RAND? was: Re: [xml-dev] more pate nt fun - 1/23/2003 4:42:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Facts to Support RAND? was: Re: [xml-dev] more pate nt fun - 1/23/2003 6:03:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Facts to Support RAND? was: Re: [xml-dev] more pate nt fun - 1/23/2003 6:49:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Facts to Support RAND? was: Re: [xml-dev] more pate nt fun - 1/23/2003 7:16:00 PM
Writing Encrypted XML to a File - 1/23/2003 8:03:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Writing Encrypted XML to a File - 1/23/2003 8:22:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Writing Encrypted XML to a File - 1/23/2003 8:32:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] many-to-many - 1/23/2003 8:04:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] many-to-many - 1/23/2003 8:40:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] many-to-many - 1/24/2003 1:22:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] many-to-many - 1/23/2003 8:45:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] many-to-many - 1/23/2003 8:48:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] many-to-many - 1/23/2003 9:44:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] many-to-many - 1/23/2003 8:54:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] many-to-many - 1/23/2003 8:54:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] many-to-many - 1/23/2003 9:02:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] many-to-many - 1/23/2003 9:06:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] many-to-many - 1/23/2003 9:30:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] many-to-many - 1/24/2003 6:22:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] many-to-many - 1/24/2003 7:24:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] many-to-many - 1/24/2003 9:14:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] many-to-many - 1/25/2003 1:30:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] many-to-many - 1/25/2003 5:03:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] many-to-many - 1/25/2003 6:31:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] many-to-many - 1/26/2003 6:26:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] many-to-many - 1/26/2003 8:14:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] many-to-many - 1/27/2003 12:26:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] many-to-many - 1/27/2003 4:46:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] many-to-many - 1/28/2003 1:40:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] many-to-many - 1/25/2003 7:02:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] many-to-many - 1/25/2003 1:37:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] many-to-many - 1/25/2003 9:27:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] many-to-many - 1/26/2003 6:46:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] many-to-many - 1/26/2003 9:59:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] many-to-many - 1/27/2003 12:35:00 PM
Roles and functions [was: many-to-many] - 1/27/2003 5:48:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Roles and functions [was: many-to-many] - 1/30/2003 9:59:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Roles and functions [was: many-to-many] - 1/30/2003 10:31:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] many-to-many - 1/27/2003 5:35:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] many-to-many - 1/27/2003 4:37:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] many-to-many - 1/27/2003 4:47:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] many-to-many - 1/27/2003 10:30:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] many-to-many - 1/27/2003 5:18:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] many-to-many - 1/27/2003 6:07:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] many-to-many - 1/23/2003 9:43:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] many-to-many - 1/23/2003 9:46:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] many-to-many - 1/23/2003 9:52:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] many-to-many - 1/23/2003 9:52:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] many-to-many - 1/23/2003 9:57:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] many-to-many - 1/23/2003 10:12:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] many-to-many - 1/23/2003 10:10:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] many-to-many - 1/24/2003 1:36:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] many-to-many - 1/25/2003 12:56:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] many-to-many - 1/25/2003 9:06:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] many-to-many - 1/25/2003 9:15:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] many-to-many - 1/25/2003 9:32:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] many-to-many - 1/25/2003 9:45:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] many-to-many - 1/26/2003 1:27:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] many-to-many - 1/26/2003 4:15:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] many-to-many - 1/26/2003 11:23:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] many-to-many - 1/26/2003 3:21:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] many-to-many - 1/26/2003 5:12:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] many-to-many - 1/26/2003 5:45:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] many-to-many - 1/26/2003 6:26:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] many-to-many - 1/26/2003 7:14:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] many-to-many - 1/27/2003 12:38:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] many-to-many - 1/27/2003 4:37:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] many-to-many - 1/27/2003 12:21:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] many-to-many - 1/27/2003 1:38:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] many-to-many - 1/27/2003 2:23:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] many-to-many - 1/27/2003 3:28:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] many-to-many - 1/27/2003 4:23:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] many-to-many - 1/27/2003 1:50:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] many-to-many - 1/26/2003 8:56:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] many-to-many - 1/26/2003 6:14:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] many-to-many - 1/26/2003 7:17:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] many-to-many - 1/26/2003 6:40:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] many-to-many - 1/25/2003 10:10:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] many-to-many - 1/27/2003 2:54:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] many-to-many - 1/27/2003 10:20:00 AM
Is Resource/Representation a fruitful abstraction? (was Re: [xml-dev]many-to-many) - 1/26/2003 1:18:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] many-to-many - 1/26/2003 1:25:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Is Resource/Representation a fruitful abstraction? (wasRe: [xml-dev] many-to-many) - 1/26/2003 3:26:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] many-to-many - 1/26/2003 8:38:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Is Resource/Representation a fruitful abstraction? - 1/26/2003 10:10:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] many-to-many - 1/26/2003 12:51:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] many-to-many - 1/26/2003 1:23:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] many-to-many - 1/26/2003 4:49:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] many-to-many - 1/26/2003 5:17:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] many-to-many - 1/26/2003 5:25:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Is Resource/Representation a fruitful abstraction? (was Re: [xml-dev] many-to-many) - 1/26/2003 5:27:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] many-to-many - 1/26/2003 5:35:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Is Resource/Representation a fruitful abstraction? (wasRe: [xml-dev] many-to-many) - 1/26/2003 6:27:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] many-to-many - 1/26/2003 7:45:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] many-to-many - 1/26/2003 10:22:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] many-to-many - 1/28/2003 12:43:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Is Resource/Representation a fruitful abstraction?(was Re: [xml-dev] many-to-many) - 1/30/2003 2:07:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Is Resource/Representation a fruitful abstraction? - 1/30/2003 2:19:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Is Resource/Representation a fruitful abstraction? - 1/30/2003 3:52:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Is Resource/Representation a fruitful abstraction? - 1/30/2003 2:31:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Is Resource/Representation a fruitful abstraction? (wasRe: [xml-dev] many-to-many) - 1/30/2003 3:12:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Is Resource/Representation a fruitful abstraction? (was Re: [xml-dev] many-to-many) - 1/30/2003 7:18:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Is Resource/Representation a fruitful abstraction? (wasRe: [xml-dev] many-to-many) - 1/30/2003 8:13:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Is Resource/Representation a fruitful abstraction?(was Re: [xml-dev] many-to-many) - 1/30/2003 10:47:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Is Resource/Representation a fruitful abstraction? - 1/30/2003 11:02:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Is Resource/Representation a fruitful abstraction? (wasRe: [xml-dev] many-to-many) - 1/31/2003 1:21:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Is Resource/Representation a fruitful abstraction? (wasRe: [xml-dev] many-to-many) - 1/31/2003 6:04:00 AM
Processing instruction guidelines - 1/23/2003 11:09:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Processing instruction guidelines - 1/23/2003 11:52:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Processing instruction guidelines - 1/24/2003 2:54:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Processing instruction guidelines - 1/24/2003 4:45:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Processing instruction guidelines - 1/24/2003 7:52:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] Processing instruction guidelines - 1/24/2003 9:25:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Processing instruction guidelines - 1/24/2003 1:50:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Processing instruction guidelines - 1/24/2003 2:11:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Processing instruction guidelines - 1/24/2003 2:31:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Processing instruction guidelines - 1/24/2003 9:16:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Processing instruction guidelines - 1/31/2003 5:08:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Processing instruction guidelines - 1/31/2003 5:27:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] many-to-many - 1/24/2003 1:27:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] many-to-many - 1/24/2003 1:47:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] many-to-many - 1/24/2003 3:30:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] many-to-many - 1/24/2003 6:22:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] ConciseXML arguments - 1/24/2003 8:57:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] ConciseXML arguments - 1/24/2003 11:53:00 AM
filters.. - 1/24/2003 9:20:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] many-to-many - 1/24/2003 2:22:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] many-to-many - 1/24/2003 4:19:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] many-to-many - 1/24/2003 2:34:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Validating stylesheet - 1/24/2003 4:56:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] many-to-many - 1/24/2003 4:57:00 PM
Ann: Examplotron 0.5 - 1/24/2003 5:11:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] many-to-many - 1/24/2003 5:58:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] many-to-many - 1/24/2003 6:44:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] many-to-many - 1/24/2003 8:05:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] many-to-many - 1/24/2003 8:23:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] many-to-many - 1/25/2003 5:52:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] many-to-many - 1/24/2003 8:31:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] many-to-many - 1/24/2003 8:50:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] many-to-many - 1/25/2003 2:02:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] many-to-many - 1/25/2003 2:08:00 AM
dtd:how to limit the depth of an element - 1/25/2003 12:20:00 PM
And do the other things. Was: many-to-many - 1/25/2003 2:32:00 PM
[announce] XMLSPY 5 Release 3 now available - 1/25/2003 6:48:00 PM
What is a "resource"? (Was: many-to-many) - 1/26/2003 10:09:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] many-to-many - 1/27/2003 3:19:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] many-to-many - 1/27/2003 4:35:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] many-to-many - 1/27/2003 11:48:00 PM
Is SAF dead? - 1/27/2003 9:52:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Is SAF dead? - 1/27/2003 6:34:00 PM
Binary Encoding using Base64 - 1/27/2003 10:22:00 AM
Re: Binary Encoding using Base64 - 1/27/2003 5:59:00 PM
JITTs related article - 1/27/2003 11:02:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Is SAF dead? - 1/27/2003 6:38:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] many-to-many - 1/27/2003 7:29:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] many-to-many - 1/27/2003 9:38:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Binary Encoding using Base64 - 1/27/2003 8:45:00 PM
[xml-dev] RDF resources (was: many-to-many) - 1/27/2003 10:26:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] RDF resources (was: many-to-many) - 1/27/2003 10:34:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] What is a "resource"? (Was: many-to-many) - 1/28/2003 2:07:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] What is a "resource"? (Was: many-to-many) - 1/28/2003 2:36:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] What is a "resource"? (Was: many-to-many) - 1/28/2003 3:45:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] What is a "resource"? (Was: many-to-many) - 1/28/2003 12:39:00 PM
[slightly off topic] RFC.net is back - 1/28/2003 7:57:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] What is a resource? (Was: many-to-many) - 1/28/2003 2:03:00 PM
New WDs which discuss URIs and resources was Re: [xml-dev] What is a resource? (Was: many-to-many) - 1/29/2003 2:18:00 AM
W3C mailinglists which discuss URIs and resources was Re: [xml-dev] What is a resource? (Was: many-to-many) - 1/29/2003 2:24:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] What is a "resource"? (Was: many-to-many) - 1/28/2003 2:34:00 PM
XCBF Committee Specification - Public Review - 1/28/2003 2:51:00 PM
xslt - 1/28/2003 2:55:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] xslt - 1/28/2003 3:03:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] xslt - 1/28/2003 3:32:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] xslt - 1/28/2003 3:19:00 PM
Physics Markup Language research - 1/28/2003 3:24:00 PM
RE: Physics Markup Language research - 1/28/2003 8:52:00 PM
Multiple include - 1/29/2003 12:57:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Multiple include - 1/29/2003 4:45:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Multiple include - 1/30/2003 11:46:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] URI Related Reading Material - 1/29/2003 2:09:00 PM
RDDL and WSDL - 1/29/2003 2:40:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] RDDL and WSDL - 1/30/2003 4:53:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Multiple include - 1/30/2003 12:29:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Multiple include - 1/30/2003 4:38:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Multiple include - 1/30/2003 4:50:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Is Resource/Representation a fruitful abstraction? (was Re: [xml-dev] many-to-many) - 1/30/2003 2:30:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Is Resource/Representation a fruitful abstraction? - 1/30/2003 2:48:00 PM
[ANN] XMLDistilled Editor Pro v2.0 Beta - 1/30/2003 4:16:00 PM
IDEALLIANCE ANNOUNCES XTN: XML TRAINING NETWORK - 1/30/2003 4:36:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] RDDL and WSDL - 1/30/2003 5:50:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] RDDL and WSDL - 1/30/2003 7:45:00 PM
OFTOPIC: Talks by John Sowa - 1/30/2003 6:54:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Is Resource/Representation a fruitful abstraction? (was Re: [xml-dev] many-to-many) - 1/30/2003 8:28:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] catch (was Re: [xml-dev] RDDL and WSDL) - 1/30/2003 8:35:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] catch (was Re: [xml-dev] RDDL and WSDL) - 1/30/2003 8:46:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] RDDL and WSDL - 1/30/2003 9:36:00 PM
XincaML - 1/30/2003 10:37:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] XincaML - 1/31/2003 6:25:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] Linguistic Philosophy Reading and URI Related Reading Material - 1/30/2003 10:39:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Linguistic Philosophy Reading and URI Related Readi ng Material - 1/30/2003 11:01:00 PM
malfunctioning, evil adult as XML - 1/31/2003 2:05:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] malfunctioning, evil adult as XML - 1/31/2003 3:33:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] malfunctioning, evil adult as XML - 1/31/2003 6:00:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] malfunctioning, evil adult as XML - 1/31/2003 6:38:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] malfunctioning, evil adult as XML - 1/31/2003 7:37:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] malfunctioning, evil adult as XML - 1/31/2003 11:25:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] malfunctioning, evil adult as XML - 1/31/2003 12:22:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] malfunctioning, evil adult as XML - 1/31/2003 3:34:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] malfunctioning, evil adult as XML - 1/31/2003 3:50:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] malfunctioning, evil adult as XML - 1/31/2003 4:01:00 AM
Anchor tags in a HTML file having no file extension - 1/31/2003 6:24:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] malfunctioning, evil adult as XML - 1/31/2003 6:57:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] malfunctioning, evil adult as XML - 1/31/2003 12:30:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] malfunctioning, evil adult as XML - 1/31/2003 12:39:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] malfunctioning, evil adult as XML - 1/31/2003 1:09:00 PM
ANN: Modular Namespaces (MNS) - 1/31/2003 7:00:00 AM
[xml-dev] find and replace using xpath - 1/31/2003 1:09:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] find and replace using xpath - 1/31/2003 2:17:00 PM
XML in Real Life - 1/31/2003 1:50:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] XML in Real Life - 1/31/2003 2:31:00 PM
Re: XML in Real Life - 1/31/2003 3:56:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] XML in Real Life - 1/31/2003 7:39:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] XML in Real Life - 1/31/2003 2:18:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] malfunctioning, evil adult as XML - 1/31/2003 2:28:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] XincaML - 1/31/2003 2:35:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] malfunctioning, evil adult as XML - 1/31/2003 3:01:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] malfunctioning, evil adult as XML - 1/31/2003 3:25:00 PM
Blaming the programmers (was Re: malfunctioning, evil adult as XML) - 1/31/2003 4:11:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Blaming the programmers - 1/31/2003 4:54:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] RDDL and WSDL - 1/31/2003 4:03:00 PM
Elliotte Rusty Harold on Web Services - 1/31/2003 4:17:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Elliotte Rusty Harold on Web Services - 1/31/2003 4:24:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Elliotte Rusty Harold on Web Services - 1/31/2003 4:32:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Elliotte Rusty Harold on Web Services - 1/31/2003 4:43:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Elliotte Rusty Harold on Web Services - 1/31/2003 4:49:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] malfunctioning, evil adult as XML - 1/31/2003 4:21:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] combining malfunctioning, evil adult as XML with Elliot Rusty Harald - 1/31/2003 4:36:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Blaming the programmers (was Re: malfunctioning, evil adult as XML) - 1/31/2003 4:45:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] malfunctioning, evil adult as XML - 1/31/2003 4:54:00 PM
Questions on Initializing Parameters for XSL - 1/31/2003 5:24:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Questions on Initializing Parameters for XSL - 1/31/2003 5:45:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Blaming the programmers (was Re: malfunctioning, evil adult as ... - 1/31/2003 6:26:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] malfunctioning, evil adult as XML - 1/31/2003 6:37:00 PM
Are There URIs in Heaven? - 1/31/2003 6:49:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] XML in Real Life - 1/31/2003 7:50:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] XML in Real Life - 1/31/2003 7:55:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Are There URIs in Heaven? - 1/31/2003 7:57:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Are There URIs in Heaven? - 1/31/2003 8:04:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Are There URIs in Heaven? - 1/31/2003 8:30:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Are There URIs in Heaven? - 1/31/2003 8:42:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Are There URIs in Heaven? - 1/31/2003 8:51:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Are There URIs in Heaven? - 1/31/2003 8:53:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Are There URIs in Heaven? - 1/31/2003 8:59:00 PM
XML Editors supporting change tracking (redlining etc.) - 1/31/2003 9:05:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] malfunctioning, evil adult as XML - 1/31/2003 9:13:00 PM
SAX Parser and Attribute Normalization - 1/31/2003 9:25:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] malfunctioning, evil adult as XML - 1/31/2003 9:38:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] SAX Parser and Attribute Normalization - 1/31/2003 10:20:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] malfunctioning, evil adult as XML - 1/31/2003 10:26:00 PM

Disclaimer

These Archives are provided for informational purposes only and have been generated directly from the Altova mailing list archive system and are comprised of the lists set forth on www.altova.com/list/index.html. Therefore, Altova does not warrant or guarantee the accuracy, reliability, completeness, usefulness, non-infringement of intellectual property rights, or quality of any content on the Altova Mailing List Archive(s), regardless of who originates that content. You expressly understand and agree that you bear all risks associated with using or relying on that content. Altova will not be liable or responsible in any way for any content posted including, but not limited to, any errors or omissions in content, or for any losses or damage of any kind incurred as a result of the use of or reliance on any content. This disclaimer and limitation on liability is in addition to the disclaimers and limitations contained in the Website Terms of Use and elsewhere on the site.