Altova Mailing List Archives

Re: [dsdl-comment] Re: [xml-dev] Re: Re: [xml-dev] DSDL: use cases: namespace declaration notation

From: james anderson <james.anderson@----.-->
To: dsdl-comment@----.---
Date: 6/14/2002 3:05:00 PM
David Carlisle wrote:
> >  In which ways is this set of names not a namespace?
> It could have been defined as being a namespace but the namespace REC (in 5.2) says
> If the URI reference in a default namespace declaration is empty, then
> unprefixed elements in the scope of the declaration are not considered
> to be in any namespace.
> which explictly says that that set is _not_ a namespace, so presumably
> it isn't.

It says that "[they] are not considered to be in any namespace," which claim, as I noted, is bogus. That is, it is "spurious,
fictitions, and a sham", and is inconsistent with the earlier definition. 

So what does one call this 'set of names which has the name "", but which one can for historical reasons not call a namespace'?



These Archives are provided for informational purposes only and have been generated directly from the Altova mailing list archive system and are comprised of the lists set forth on Therefore, Altova does not warrant or guarantee the accuracy, reliability, completeness, usefulness, non-infringement of intellectual property rights, or quality of any content on the Altova Mailing List Archive(s), regardless of who originates that content. You expressly understand and agree that you bear all risks associated with using or relying on that content. Altova will not be liable or responsible in any way for any content posted including, but not limited to, any errors or omissions in content, or for any losses or damage of any kind incurred as a result of the use of or reliance on any content. This disclaimer and limitation on liability is in addition to the disclaimers and limitations contained in the Website Terms of Use and elsewhere on the site.