Home. 
.

transparent

transparent

transparent

Altova Mailing List Archives

xml-dev



Re: [xml-dev] Visualizing data - www.kartoo.com - 6/1/2002 12:13:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Xml/xpath/xslt - 6/7/2002 10:26:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] xsi:type and broken contracts - 6/7/2002 10:45:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Interesting mailing list & a rare broadside - 6/8/2002 3:10:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] xsi:type and broken contracts - 6/8/2002 3:19:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] Interesting mailing list & a rare broadside - 6/8/2002 3:51:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box - 6/8/2002 4:47:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box - 6/8/2002 6:16:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] JMS OR SOAP - 6/8/2002 7:08:00 AM
Malicious documents? (WAS: Interesting mailing list & a rare broadside) - 6/8/2002 8:47:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box - 6/8/2002 9:12:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box - 6/8/2002 9:40:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box - 6/10/2002 2:41:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box - 6/10/2002 2:53:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box - 6/10/2002 3:25:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box - 6/10/2002 4:20:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box - 6/10/2002 4:36:00 PM
Re: RE: [xml-dev] W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box - 6/10/2002 5:25:00 PM
RE: RE: [xml-dev] W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box - 6/10/2002 6:37:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box - 6/10/2002 7:23:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box - 6/10/2002 7:48:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box - 6/10/2002 10:28:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box - 6/10/2002 8:09:00 PM
RE: RE: [xml-dev] W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box - 6/10/2002 6:43:00 PM
RE: RE: [xml-dev] W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box - 6/10/2002 7:25:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box - 6/10/2002 7:39:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box - 6/10/2002 8:01:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box - 6/10/2002 8:18:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box - 6/10/2002 9:00:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box - 6/10/2002 9:06:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box - 6/10/2002 9:15:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box - 6/10/2002 9:18:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box - 6/10/2002 10:08:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box - 6/10/2002 10:59:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box - 6/11/2002 1:26:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box - 6/11/2002 4:20:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box - 6/11/2002 11:29:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box - 6/12/2002 1:08:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box - 6/12/2002 3:37:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box - 6/12/2002 4:09:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box - 6/12/2002 4:48:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box - 6/12/2002 5:56:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box - 6/12/2002 4:40:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box - 6/12/2002 8:31:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box - 6/12/2002 10:59:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box - 6/12/2002 6:24:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box - 6/12/2002 11:38:00 PM
RE: RE: [xml-dev] W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box - 6/10/2002 7:49:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box - 6/10/2002 5:07:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Malicious documents? (WAS: Interesting mailing list& a rare broadside) - 6/8/2002 10:13:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Malicious documents? (WAS: Interesting mailing list & a rare broadside) - 6/8/2002 10:23:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] xsi:type and broken contracts - 6/8/2002 10:25:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Malicious documents? (WAS: Interesting mailing list & a rare broadside) - 6/8/2002 10:35:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] xsi:type and broken contracts - 6/8/2002 10:57:00 AM
Re: Constitutionally incapable (was Re: [xml-dev] W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box) - 6/8/2002 1:39:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] xsi:type and broken contracts - 6/8/2002 2:39:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box - 6/8/2002 3:32:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box - 6/8/2002 3:45:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] xsi:type and broken contracts - 6/8/2002 6:25:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Interesting mailing list & a rare broadside - 6/8/2002 7:22:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] xsi:type and broken contracts - 6/8/2002 7:40:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] xsi:type and broken contracts - 6/8/2002 7:50:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] xsi:type and broken contracts - 6/8/2002 8:23:00 PM
Actually, resistance is proving far from futile - 6/8/2002 8:35:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] xsi:type and broken contracts - 6/8/2002 8:45:00 PM
New version of XSV up on the web, somewhat experimental - 6/8/2002 10:26:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Can RDDL and RDF coexist? - 6/9/2002 12:10:00 AM
embedding xml schema in an instance doc - 6/9/2002 5:48:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] embedding xml schema in an instance doc - 6/9/2002 9:02:00 AM
Formatting XML - 6/9/2002 3:35:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Malicious documents? (WAS: Interesting mailing list & a rare broadside) - 6/10/2002 7:54:00 AM
How to find out the name of the tag where my xmldocument did not validate - 6/10/2002 8:16:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Malicious documents? (WAS: Interesting mailing list & a rare broadside) - 6/10/2002 9:03:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Evangelizing RNG - 6/10/2002 10:36:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Malicious documents? (WAS: Interesting mailing list& a rare broadside) - 6/10/2002 11:11:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Malicious documents? (WAS: Interesting mailing list & a rare broadside) - 6/10/2002 11:21:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Malicious documents? (WAS: Interesting mailing list & a rare broadside) - 6/10/2002 11:27:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Malicious documents? (WAS: Interesting mailing list & a rare broadside) - 6/10/2002 11:47:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Malicious documents? (WAS: Interesting mailing list & a rare broadside) - 6/10/2002 11:50:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Malicious documents? (WAS: Interesting mailing list & a rare broadside) - 6/10/2002 12:03:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Malicious documents? (WAS: Interesting mailing list & a rare broadside) - 6/10/2002 12:32:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Interesting mailing list & a rare broadside - 6/10/2002 2:06:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box - 6/10/2002 2:42:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box - 6/10/2002 2:42:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box - 6/10/2002 2:54:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box - 6/10/2002 3:33:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box - 6/10/2002 3:45:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box - 6/10/2002 4:32:00 PM
experts (RE: [xml-dev] W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box) - 6/10/2002 4:59:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box - 6/10/2002 5:00:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] experts (RE: [xml-dev] W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, saysDon Box) - 6/10/2002 5:18:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] experts (RE: [xml-dev] W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, saysDon Box) - 6/10/2002 5:30:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box - 6/10/2002 5:57:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box - 6/10/2002 6:04:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box - 6/10/2002 6:18:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box - 6/10/2002 6:53:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box - 6/10/2002 7:05:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box - 6/10/2002 7:18:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box - 6/10/2002 8:34:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box - 6/11/2002 3:51:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box - 6/10/2002 4:05:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Borrowed email address for virus - 6/10/2002 4:57:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] experts (RE: [xml-dev] W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box) - 6/10/2002 5:03:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box - 6/10/2002 5:23:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box - 6/10/2002 5:38:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] experts (RE: [xml-dev] W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, saysDon Box) - 6/10/2002 5:51:00 PM
XML syntax for XPath - 6/10/2002 5:57:00 PM
Re: xml-dev Digest 10 Jun 2002 15:30:40 -0000 Issue 339 - 6/10/2002 5:59:00 PM
remembering Orlando - 6/10/2002 6:12:00 PM
(more details) embedding xml schema in an instance doc - 6/10/2002 6:46:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] (more details) embedding xml schema in an instance doc - 6/10/2002 6:55:00 PM
ANN: update to XSLToolbox - 6/10/2002 7:07:00 PM
RE: RE: [xml-dev] W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box - 6/10/2002 7:28:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box - 6/10/2002 7:30:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] (more details) embedding xml schema in an instance doc - 6/10/2002 7:56:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] (more details) embedding xml schema in an instance doc - 6/10/2002 8:38:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] (more details) embedding xml schema in an instance doc - 6/10/2002 8:52:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Xml/xpath/xslt - 6/10/2002 10:58:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Xml/xpath/xslt - 6/11/2002 12:21:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box - 6/11/2002 2:47:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box - 6/11/2002 2:54:00 AM
Pretty good interview with GM CTO Scott - 6/11/2002 3:56:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box - 6/11/2002 4:18:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box - 6/11/2002 3:30:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box - 6/11/2002 3:39:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box - 6/11/2002 3:52:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box - 6/11/2002 4:41:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box - 6/11/2002 5:41:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box - 6/11/2002 6:01:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box - 6/11/2002 6:20:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box - 6/11/2002 6:43:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box - 6/11/2002 7:19:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box - 6/11/2002 7:37:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box - 6/11/2002 8:24:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box - 6/11/2002 9:05:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box - 6/11/2002 9:40:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box - 6/12/2002 10:51:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box - 6/13/2002 8:48:00 PM
dates (was Re: [xml-dev] W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box) - 6/11/2002 6:57:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] dates (was Re: [xml-dev] W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, - 6/11/2002 7:24:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] dates (was Re: [xml-dev] W3C Schema: Resistance isFutile, says Don Box) - 6/11/2002 7:57:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] dates (was Re: [xml-dev] W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box) - 6/11/2002 8:06:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] dates (was Re: [xml-dev] W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box) - 6/12/2002 6:56:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box - 6/12/2002 10:12:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box - 6/12/2002 10:50:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box - 6/12/2002 11:20:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box - 6/12/2002 12:50:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box - 6/12/2002 2:51:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box - 6/12/2002 9:46:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box - 6/12/2002 10:22:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box - 6/11/2002 4:48:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box - 6/12/2002 2:15:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] (more details) embedding xml schema in an instance doc - 6/11/2002 4:08:00 PM
RealSystem ML File - 6/11/2002 4:14:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Data binding as type definition - 6/11/2002 4:26:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box - 6/11/2002 4:33:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box - 6/11/2002 4:35:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Data binding as type definition - 6/11/2002 4:36:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] (more details) embedding xml schema in an instance doc - 6/11/2002 5:20:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] XML syntax for XPath - 6/11/2002 5:27:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] (more details) embedding xml schema in an instance doc - 6/11/2002 5:30:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box - 6/11/2002 5:34:00 PM
Come On, DTD, Come On! Thoughts on DSDL Part 9 - 6/11/2002 5:42:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Come On, DTD, Come On! Thoughts on DSDL Part 9 - 6/11/2002 7:28:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Come On, DTD, Come On! Thoughts on DSDL Part 9 - 6/11/2002 7:39:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Come On, DTD, Come On! Thoughts on DSDL Part 9 - 6/12/2002 4:49:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Come On, DTD, Come On! Thoughts on DSDL Part 9 - 6/12/2002 6:34:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Come On, DTD, Come On! Thoughts on DSDL Part 9 - 6/12/2002 12:27:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Come On, DTD, Come On! Thoughts on DSDL Part 9 - 6/12/2002 1:24:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Come On, DTD, Come On! Thoughts on DSDL Part 9 - 6/13/2002 6:44:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Come On, DTD, Come On! Thoughts on DSDL Part 9 - 6/12/2002 1:05:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Come On, DTD, Come On! Thoughts on DSDL Part 9 - 6/12/2002 8:55:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Come On, DTD, Come On! Thoughts on DSDL Part 9 - 6/12/2002 11:11:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Come On, DTD, Come On! Thoughts on DSDL Part 9 - 6/13/2002 6:42:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Come On, DTD, Come On! Thoughts on DSDL Part 9 - 6/13/2002 12:02:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Come On, DTD, Come On! Thoughts on DSDL Part 9 - 6/13/2002 1:26:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Come On, DTD, Come On! Thoughts on DSDL Part 9 - 6/13/2002 10:56:00 AM
DSDL: use cases: namespace declaration notation - 6/13/2002 3:50:00 PM
Re: [dsdl-comment] DSDL: use cases: namespace declaration notation - 6/14/2002 3:52:00 AM
Re: [dsdl-comment] Re: DSDL: use cases: namespace declaration notation - 6/14/2002 8:08:00 AM
Re: [dsdl-comment] Re: DSDL: use cases: namespace declaration notation - 6/14/2002 10:47:00 AM
Re: [dsdl-comment] Re: DSDL: use cases: namespace declaration notation - 6/14/2002 11:29:00 AM
Re: [dsdl-comment] Re: DSDL: use cases: namespace declaration notation - 6/14/2002 12:37:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Re: [dsdl-comment] Re: DSDL: use cases: namespace declaration notation - 6/14/2002 11:43:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Re: [dsdl-comment] Re: DSDL: use cases: namespace declaration notation - 6/14/2002 1:39:00 PM
DSDL part 9: new namespace declarations not needed as part of DTD syntax? - 6/14/2002 8:43:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] DSDL part 9: new namespace declarations not needed as part of DTD syntax? - 6/14/2002 10:33:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] DSDL part 9: new namespace declarations not needed as part of DTD syntax? - 6/16/2002 12:25:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] DSDL part 9: new namespace declarations not neededas part of DTD syntax? - 6/16/2002 2:24:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] DSDL part 9: new namespace declarations not needed as part of DTD syntax? - 6/16/2002 5:24:00 AM
Why validate? What kind of validation? - 6/16/2002 6:02:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] DSDL part 9: new namespace declarations not neededas part of DTD syntax? - 6/16/2002 8:41:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] DSDL part 9: new namespace declarations not needed - 6/17/2002 12:56:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] DSDL part 9: new namespace declarations not needed - 6/17/2002 7:45:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] DSDL part 9: new namespace declarations not needed - 6/17/2002 7:52:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] DSDL part 9: new namespace declarations not needed as part of DTD syntax? - 6/14/2002 2:15:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] DSDL part 9: new namespace declarations not needed as part of DTD syntax? - 6/14/2002 2:26:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] DSDL part 9: new namespace declarations not needed as part of DTD syntax? - 6/14/2002 5:27:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] DSDL part 9: new namespace declarations not needed as part of DTD syntax? - 6/14/2002 9:15:00 AM
Re: DSDL part 9: new namespace declarations not needed as part of DTD syntax? - 6/14/2002 9:24:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] DSDL part 9: new namespace declarations not needed as part of DTD syntax? - 6/14/2002 1:55:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] DSDL part 9: new namespace declarations not needed as part of DTD syntax? - 6/14/2002 3:49:00 PM
Re: [dsdl-comment] Re: [xml-dev] DSDL part 9: new namespace declarations not needed as part - 6/14/2002 4:10:00 PM
Re: [dsdl-comment] Re: [xml-dev] DSDL part 9: new namespace declarations not needed as part - 6/14/2002 4:40:00 PM
Re: [dsdl-comment] Re: [xml-dev] DSDL part 9: new namespace declarations - 6/14/2002 5:00:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] DSDL part 9: new namespace declarations not needed as part of DTD syntax? - 6/14/2002 5:47:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] DSDL part 9: new namespace declarations not needed as part of DTD syntax? - 6/14/2002 6:22:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] DSDL part 9: new namespace declarations not needed as part of DTD syntax? - 6/14/2002 9:19:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] DSDL part 9: new namespace declarations not needed as part of DTD syntax? - 6/14/2002 9:36:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] DSDL part 9: new namespace declarations not needed as part of DTD syntax? - 6/14/2002 10:16:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] DSDL part 9: new namespace declarations not needed as part of DTD syntax? - 6/17/2002 6:09:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] DSDL part 9: new namespace declarations not needed as part of DTD syntax? - 6/15/2002 8:21:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Come On, DTD, Come On! Thoughts on DSDL Part 9 - 6/13/2002 9:15:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Come On, DTD, Come On! Thoughts on DSDL Part 9 - 6/13/2002 10:54:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Come On, DTD, Come On! Thoughts on DSDL Part 9 - 6/13/2002 11:16:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Come On, DTD, Come On! Thoughts on DSDL Part 9 - 6/13/2002 11:50:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Come On, DTD, Come On! Thoughts on DSDL Part 9 - 6/14/2002 12:17:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Come On, DTD, Come On! Thoughts on DSDL Part 9 - 6/14/2002 5:11:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Come On, DTD, Come On! Thoughts on DSDL Part 9 - 6/14/2002 5:38:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Come On, DTD, Come On! Thoughts on DSDL Part 9 - 6/14/2002 7:14:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] DSDL: use cases: namespace declaration notation - 6/14/2002 9:01:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] DSDL: use cases: namespace declaration notation - 6/14/2002 9:44:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] DSDL: use cases: namespace declaration notation - 6/14/2002 10:15:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] DSDL: use cases: namespace declaration notation - 6/14/2002 11:14:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] DSDL: use cases: namespace declaration notation - 6/14/2002 11:20:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] DSDL: use cases: namespace declaration notation - 6/14/2002 11:25:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] DSDL: use cases: namespace declaration notation - 6/14/2002 12:07:00 PM
Re: [dsdl-comment] Re: [xml-dev] DSDL: use cases: namespace declaration notation - 6/14/2002 2:03:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Re: [dsdl-comment] Re: [xml-dev] DSDL: use cases: namespace declaration notation - 6/14/2002 3:18:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Re: [dsdl-comment] Re: [xml-dev] DSDL: use cases: namespace declaration notation - 6/14/2002 3:24:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Re: [dsdl-comment] Re: [xml-dev] DSDL: use cases: namespace declaration notation - 6/14/2002 2:12:00 PM
Re: [dsdl-comment] Re: [xml-dev] Re: Re: [xml-dev] DSDL: use cases: namespace declaration notation - 6/14/2002 3:05:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Re: [dsdl-comment] Re: [xml-dev] Re: Re: [xml-dev] DSDL: use cases: namespace declaration notation - 6/14/2002 3:30:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Re: [dsdl-comment] Re: [xml-dev] Re: Re: [xml-dev] DSDL: use cases: namespace declaration notation - 6/14/2002 4:07:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Re: [dsdl-comment] Re: [xml-dev] Re: Re: [xml-dev] DSDL: use cases: namespace declaration notation - 6/14/2002 4:33:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Re: [dsdl-comment] Re: [xml-dev] Re: Re: [xml-dev] DSDL: use cases: namespace declaration notation - 6/14/2002 4:45:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Re: [dsdl-comment] Re: [xml-dev] Re: Re: [xml-dev] DSDL: use cases: namespace declaration notation - 6/14/2002 5:03:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Re: [dsdl-comment] Re: [xml-dev] Re: Re: [xml-dev]DSDL: use cases: namespace declaration notation - 6/14/2002 6:05:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Re: [dsdl-comment] Re: [xml-dev] Re: Re: [xml-dev] DSDL:use cases: namespace declaration notation - 6/15/2002 1:32:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] DSDL: use cases: namespace declaration notation - 6/14/2002 11:37:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Come On, DTD, Come On! Thoughts on DSDL Part 9 - 6/14/2002 12:09:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Data binding as type definition - 6/11/2002 6:20:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box - 6/11/2002 6:26:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box - 6/11/2002 6:38:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] XML syntax for XPath - 6/11/2002 7:27:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] dates (was Re: [xml-dev] W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box) - 6/11/2002 7:29:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] (more details) embedding xml schema in an instance doc - 6/11/2002 9:38:00 PM
[off-topic] For-pay APIs - 6/12/2002 12:52:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] RealSystem ML File - 6/12/2002 4:38:00 AM
Best Mailing List for Web Services? - 6/12/2002 6:18:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box - 6/12/2002 7:23:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box - 6/12/2002 11:32:00 AM
When do tags stop being a good idea? - 6/12/2002 1:57:00 PM
Resistance is not Futile because Change is Inevitable and You Might As Well Get Paid for Implementing It - 6/12/2002 2:05:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] When do tags stop being a good idea? - 6/12/2002 2:07:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] When do tags stop being a good idea? - 6/12/2002 2:09:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Resistance is not Futile because Change is Inevitable and You Might As Well Get Paid for Implementing It - 6/12/2002 2:18:00 PM
call for presentations - 6/12/2002 2:25:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Resistance is not Futile because Change is Inevitable and You Mig ht As Well Get Paid for Implementing It - 6/12/2002 2:26:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Resistance is not Futile because Change is Inevitab le and You Mig ht As Well Get Paid for Implementing It - 6/12/2002 2:31:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Resistance is not Futile because Change is Inevitab - 6/12/2002 2:38:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] So off-topic it may be too weird even for XML-DEV ... - 6/12/2002 2:42:00 PM
Periodic plea for a bit of throttling back - 6/12/2002 4:07:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Periodic plea for a bit of throttling back - 6/12/2002 4:34:00 PM
Error in a Class Cast - 6/12/2002 4:48:00 PM
<xsd:all> problem - 6/12/2002 4:51:00 PM
SOAP, XSD, and HTTP - 6/12/2002 4:58:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] SOAP, XSD, and HTTP - 6/12/2002 5:09:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] SOAP, XSD, and HTTP - 6/12/2002 5:19:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] SOAP, XSD, and HTTP - 6/12/2002 7:26:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Resistance is not Futile because Change is Inevitable and You Might As Well Get Paid for Implementing It - 6/12/2002 9:07:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Resistance is not Futile because Change is Inevitable and You Might As Well Get Paid for Implementing It - 6/12/2002 9:33:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] XML Conformance Test Suite at W3C - 6/13/2002 12:23:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] Resistance is not Futile because Change is Inevitable and You Might As Well Get Paid for Implementing It - 6/13/2002 7:27:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] SOAP, XSD, and HTTP - 6/13/2002 8:58:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] SOAP, XSD, and HTTP - 6/13/2002 2:10:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Are there any tools that do some DTD introspection? - 6/13/2002 2:19:00 PM
Lightning Talks at Open Source Conference - 6/13/2002 2:22:00 PM
dtd, schema vs RDF - 6/13/2002 3:07:00 PM
CLaRK System - an XML-based System for Corpora Development - 6/13/2002 6:31:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Resistance is not Futile because Change is Inevitable and You Might As Well Get Paid for Implementing It - 6/13/2002 7:41:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Resistance is not Futile because Change is Inevitable and You Might As Well Get Paid for Implementing It - 6/13/2002 8:00:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile - 6/13/2002 9:03:00 PM
MSXML + Xerces DOM compatibility - 6/13/2002 10:29:00 PM
validation and typechecking - 6/14/2002 7:04:00 AM
Validate with schemas - 6/14/2002 10:03:00 AM
Tommorrow, June 15th, Deadline for Call for Presentation for XML 2002 Conference - 6/14/2002 12:07:00 PM
Re: [dsdl-comment] Re: [xml-dev] Re: Re: DSDL: use cases: namespace - 6/14/2002 12:39:00 PM
RE: RE: [xml-dev] W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile - 6/14/2002 1:35:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Come On, DTD, Come On! Thoughts on DSDL Part 9 - 6/14/2002 1:40:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Re: [dsdl-comment] Re: [xml-dev] DSDL: use cases: namespace declaration notation - 6/14/2002 3:43:00 PM
[ANN] New SAX 2.0 Parser for C++ - 6/14/2002 4:22:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Validate with schemas - 6/14/2002 5:31:00 PM
XML Documents Complexity - 6/14/2002 11:11:00 PM
XUL Fool? - 6/16/2002 3:31:00 AM
XML to DTD Converter - 6/16/2002 6:17:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Illegal Characters in Namespace URIs - 6/17/2002 1:26:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] User interface programming XUL? - 6/17/2002 7:34:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] User interface programming XUL? - 6/17/2002 7:37:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] User interface programming XUL? - 6/17/2002 7:58:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] User interface programming XUL? - 6/17/2002 8:04:00 AM
Namespaces and DTDs - Why not use what we have? - 6/17/2002 11:50:00 AM
RE: XML Infoset vs XML Tagged Text - 6/17/2002 1:25:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] MSXML + Xerces DOM compatibility - 6/17/2002 1:33:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] DSDL part 9: new namespace declarations not needed as part of DTD syntax? - 6/17/2002 1:44:00 PM
Best Practice - beyond schema - 6/17/2002 2:11:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Best Practice - beyond schema - 6/17/2002 2:34:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Best Practice - beyond schema - 6/17/2002 2:49:00 PM
ANN: Python implementation of Regular Fragmentations and online demo - 6/17/2002 3:08:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Best Practice - beyond schema - 6/17/2002 3:57:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Best Practice - beyond schema - 6/17/2002 6:14:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] DSDL part 9: new namespace declarations not needed as part of DTD syntax? - 6/17/2002 6:29:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] User interface programming XUL? - 6/17/2002 7:11:00 PM
Parse Error - Invalid Character - 6/17/2002 7:23:00 PM
ANNOUNCE: RDF Gateway v0.9.5 Released - 6/17/2002 8:52:00 PM
New presentation about XML Schema Datatypes - 6/17/2002 9:47:00 PM
Updated Unicode presentation from XML 2001 - 6/17/2002 9:53:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] XUL available application, examples, demo. development? - 6/18/2002 12:14:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] Best Practice - beyond schema - 6/18/2002 8:56:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] XUL available application, examples, demo. development? - 6/18/2002 12:15:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Best Practice - beyond schema - 6/18/2002 12:15:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Best Practice - beyond schema - 6/18/2002 2:06:00 PM
ANNOUNCE: Stylus Studio 4.0 Now Available -- Free - 6/18/2002 5:21:00 PM
Software Integration Markup Language? - 6/19/2002 10:52:00 AM
OASIS TC Call For Participation: Management Protocol TC - 6/19/2002 12:45:00 PM
What Is Type Augmentation and Should We Be Concerned? (WAS RE: [xml-dev] Best Practice - beyond schema) - 6/19/2002 1:27:00 PM
OASIS TC Call For Participation: Automotive Repair Information TC - 6/19/2002 1:58:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] New presentation about XML Schema Datatypes - 6/19/2002 6:51:00 PM
SAX Question - 6/19/2002 9:22:00 PM
Ann: Xml Validation Interoperability Framework (xvif) - 6/20/2002 9:22:00 AM
Re: XML to DTD Converter - 6/20/2002 10:36:00 AM
Format Output - 6/20/2002 11:09:00 AM
Extreme Markup Languages Program Now Available...Join other XML-Dev participants in Montreal - 6/20/2002 3:46:00 PM
(location.pathname.substring(0,6) - 6/20/2002 7:46:00 PM
xvif: fallback mechanism - 6/21/2002 7:24:00 AM
xvif: not for schemas only - 6/21/2002 7:42:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] Parse Error - Invalid Character - 6/21/2002 8:55:00 AM
Relax Lexical vs XML Lexical structure - 6/21/2002 5:50:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Relax Lexical vs XML Lexical structure - 6/21/2002 6:04:00 PM
XML Schema to relaxNG xslt - 6/21/2002 6:14:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] XML Schema to relaxNG xslt - 6/21/2002 6:16:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] XML Schema to relaxNG xslt - 6/21/2002 6:22:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] XML Schema to relaxNG xslt - 6/21/2002 6:25:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] XML Schema to relaxNG xslt - 6/21/2002 6:29:00 PM
Re: XML Schema to relaxNG xslt - 6/22/2002 11:40:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] XML Schema to relaxNG xslt - 6/21/2002 7:09:00 PM
How to Unsubscribe - 6/21/2002 7:09:00 PM
Relax NG Projects - 6/21/2002 7:10:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Relax NG Projects - 6/21/2002 7:43:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Relax NG Projects - 6/21/2002 8:01:00 PM
stopping XML (was RE: [xml-dev] Relax NG Projects) - 6/21/2002 8:21:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Relax NG Projects - 6/22/2002 7:45:00 AM
[off-topic] Re: [xml-dev] Relax NG Projects - 6/22/2002 8:12:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] XML Schema to relaxNG xslt - 6/21/2002 8:12:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] XML Schema to relaxNG xslt - 6/21/2002 8:20:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Relax NG Projects - 6/21/2002 8:27:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] stopping XML (was RE: [xml-dev] Relax NG Projects) - 6/21/2002 8:42:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] XML Schema to relaxNG xslt - 6/21/2002 9:44:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] XML Schema to relaxNG xslt - 6/22/2002 6:29:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] XML Schema to relaxNG xslt - 6/22/2002 6:40:00 PM
RE: XML Schema to relaxNG xslt - 6/22/2002 7:21:00 PM
RE: XML Schema to relaxNG xslt - 6/22/2002 8:29:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] RE: XML Schema to relaxNG xslt - 6/23/2002 5:26:00 AM
Suggestions for a slightly less verbose (and easier to author) XML - 6/23/2002 8:45:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Suggestions for a slightly less verbose (and easier to author) XML - 6/23/2002 8:50:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Suggestions for a slightly less verbose (and easier to author) XML - 6/23/2002 9:31:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Suggestions for a slightly less verbose (and easier to author) XML - 6/23/2002 10:03:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Suggestions for a slightly less verbose (and easierto author) XML - 6/23/2002 10:16:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Suggestions for a slightly less verbose (and easier to author) XML - 6/23/2002 10:29:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Suggestions for a slightly less verbose (and easierto author) XML - 6/23/2002 10:37:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Suggestions for a slightly less verbose (and easierto author) XML - 6/23/2002 10:41:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Suggestions for a slightly less verbose (and easierto author) XML - 6/23/2002 10:45:00 PM
Logical markup Language - 6/23/2002 11:17:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Suggestions for a slightly less verbose (and easierto author) XML - 6/23/2002 11:46:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Logical markup Language - 6/24/2002 3:58:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Suggestions for a slightly less verbose (and easiertoauthor) XML - 6/24/2002 4:23:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Suggestions for a slightly less verbose (and easier to author) XML - 6/24/2002 4:27:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Suggestions for a slightly less verbose (and easierto author) XML - 6/24/2002 9:13:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Suggestions for a slightly less verbose (and easierto author) XML - 6/24/2002 12:40:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Suggestions for a slightly less verbose (and easierto author) XML - 6/24/2002 5:37:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Suggestions for a slightly less verbose (and easierto author) XML - 6/24/2002 5:47:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Suggestions for a slightly less verbose (and easierto author) XML - 6/24/2002 7:27:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Suggestions for a slightly less verbose (and easier to author) XML - 6/25/2002 12:37:00 PM
Real life XML (was: Suggestions for a slightly less verbose (andeasier to author) XML) - 6/25/2002 7:08:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Real life XML (was: Suggestions for a slightly less verbose (andeasier to author) XML) - 6/25/2002 10:35:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Real life XML (was: Suggestions for a slightly lessverbose (andeasier to author) XML) - 6/25/2002 10:49:00 PM
on the subject of schema crunching... - 6/23/2002 9:00:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] on the subject of schema crunching... - 6/23/2002 9:07:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] on the subject of schema crunching... - 6/23/2002 10:44:00 PM
Updated on 6 - 6/24/2002 12:09:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] XML Schema to relaxNG xslt - 6/24/2002 2:00:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] DTDs, W3C Schemas, RELAX NG, Schematron? - 6/24/2002 3:47:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] DTDs, W3C Schemas, RELAX NG, Schematron? - 6/24/2002 4:05:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] DTDs, W3C Schemas, RELAX NG, Schematron? - 6/24/2002 5:42:00 AM
Namespace declaration using DOM - 6/24/2002 6:52:00 AM
Namespace declaration using DOM - 6/24/2002 8:48:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Suggestions for a slightly less verbose (and easierto author) XML - 6/24/2002 11:10:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] schema management for a document pipeline: requestfor comment - 6/24/2002 11:16:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] Relax NG Projects - 6/24/2002 1:35:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Suggestions for a slightly less verbose (and easierto author) XML - 6/24/2002 1:55:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] DTDs, W3C Schemas, RELAX NG, Schematron? - 6/24/2002 2:53:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] DTDs, W3C Schemas, RELAX NG, Schematron? - 6/24/2002 3:50:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] DTDs, W3C Schemas, RELAX NG, Schematron? - 6/24/2002 4:27:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] DTDs, W3C Schemas, RELAX NG, Schematron? - 6/24/2002 4:58:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] XML Schema to relaxNG xslt - 6/24/2002 8:31:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Intuition and XML Schema restriction (was: XML Schema to relaxNG xslt) - 6/25/2002 1:18:00 AM
help - Writing schema - 6/25/2002 6:37:00 AM
Announce: XML Schema, The W3C's Object-Oriented Descriptions for XML - 6/25/2002 7:48:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] DTDs, W3C Schemas, RELAX NG, Schematron? - 6/25/2002 8:02:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Suggestions for a slightly less verbose (and easier to author) XML - 6/25/2002 8:27:00 AM
Objects vs. XML aka LISP and How History Repeats Itself - 6/25/2002 1:35:00 PM
Java - XMLReader and SAX Filters - 6/25/2002 2:20:00 PM
[ANN] RelaxNGCC Ver.1.0 - 6/25/2002 2:34:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Announce: XML Schema, The W3C's Object-Oriented Descriptions for XML - 6/25/2002 3:49:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Announce: XML Schema, The W3C's Object-Oriented Des - 6/25/2002 4:01:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Announce: XML Schema, The W3C's Object-Oriented Des criptions for XML - 6/25/2002 4:01:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Announce: XML Schema, The W3C's Object-Oriented Descriptions for XML - 6/25/2002 4:56:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Announce: XML Schema, The W3C's Object-Oriented Descriptions for XML - 6/25/2002 6:53:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Announce: XML Schema, The W3C's Object-Oriented Descriptions for XML - 6/26/2002 3:29:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Announce: XML Schema, The W3C's Object-Oriented Descriptions for XML - 6/26/2002 6:05:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Announce: XML Schema, The W3C's Object-OrientedDescriptions for XML - 6/26/2002 6:58:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] Announce: XML Schema, The W3C's Object-Oriented Des - 6/25/2002 4:16:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Announce: XML Schema, The W3C's Object-Oriented Des criptions for XML - 6/25/2002 4:16:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Best Practice - beyond schema - 6/25/2002 4:21:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Suggestions for a slightly less verbose (and easier to author) XML - 6/25/2002 6:18:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Suggestions for a slightly less verbose (and easierto author) XML - 6/25/2002 6:29:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Suggestions for a slightly less verbose (and easier to author) XML - 6/25/2002 6:37:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Announce: XML Schema, The W3C's Object-Oriented Des criptions for XML - 6/25/2002 6:59:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Announce: XML Schema, The W3C's Object-Oriented Descriptions for XML - 6/25/2002 7:05:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Announce: XML Schema, The W3C's Object-Oriented Descriptions for XML - 6/25/2002 7:48:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Suggestions for a slightly less verbose (and easier to author) XML - 6/25/2002 8:00:00 PM
[offtopic] A message from the rebellion. - 6/25/2002 8:51:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Announce: XML Schema, The W3C's Object-Oriented Des criptions for XML - 6/25/2002 9:18:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Real life XML (was: Suggestions for a slightly less verbose (andeasier to author) XML) - 6/25/2002 10:40:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Real life XML (was: Suggestions for a slightly lessverbose (andeasier to author) XML) - 6/25/2002 11:27:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] DTDs, W3C Schemas, RELAX NG, Schematron? - 6/26/2002 7:08:00 AM
Sablotron 0.95 - 6/26/2002 7:55:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] [off-topic] Re: Relax NG Projects - 6/26/2002 10:23:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] [offtopic] A message from the rebellion. - 6/26/2002 1:15:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Announce: XML Schema, The W3C's Object-Oriented Descriptions for XML - 6/26/2002 1:44:00 PM
Saving a DOM Tree that's in IE - 6/26/2002 2:05:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Announce: XML Schema, The W3C's Object-Oriented Descriptions for XML - 6/26/2002 2:07:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Announce: XML Schema, The W3C's Object-OrientedDescriptions for XML - 6/26/2002 2:08:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Saving a DOM Tree that's in IE - 6/26/2002 2:10:00 PM
OASIS announcement of Online Dispute Resolution discussion list - 6/26/2002 2:31:00 PM
XML schema for non-XML file? - 6/26/2002 2:41:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Announce: XML Schema, The W3C's Object-Oriented Descriptions for XML - 6/26/2002 3:25:00 PM
[ANNOUNCE] XPB4J-0.90: Java Program to measure and compare XML Parsing/Processing performance - 6/26/2002 6:36:00 PM
grammar - 6/27/2002 1:56:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Announce: XML Schema, - 6/27/2002 6:35:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] English sentences, was: Re: [xml-dev] Announce: XMLSchema, - 6/27/2002 12:17:00 PM
[ANN] XML Editor 1.2 - available also Online as an Applet - 6/27/2002 12:39:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Re: English sentences, was: Re: [xml-dev] Announce: XML Schema, - 6/27/2002 12:57:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] English sentences, was: Re: [xml-dev] Announce: XMLSchema, - 6/27/2002 12:58:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Re: English sentences, was: Re: [xml-dev] Announce: XML Schema, - 6/27/2002 1:05:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] English sentences, was: Re: [xml-dev] Announce:XMLSchema, - 6/27/2002 1:16:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Re: English sentences, was: Re: [xml-dev] Announce: XML Schema, - 6/27/2002 3:00:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Announce: XML Schema, The W3C's Object-Oriented Descriptions for XML - 6/27/2002 6:08:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Announce: XML Schema, The W3C's Object-Oriented Descriptions for XML - 6/27/2002 6:35:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] English sentences,was: Re: [xml-dev] Announce: XML Schema, - 6/27/2002 10:26:00 PM
[XPB4J] RE: What's XSLT doing in here? - 6/28/2002 4:29:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] English sentences, was: Re: [xml-dev] Announce:XML Schema, - 6/28/2002 7:00:00 AM
Proposal for an introspector collaboration toolchain - 6/28/2002 8:33:00 AM
Partial validation in RelaxNG? - 6/28/2002 10:02:00 AM
XHTML modularisation causes strange error with MSXML - 6/28/2002 12:19:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] XHTML modularisation causes strange error with MSXML - 6/28/2002 1:10:00 PM
XMLSchema for object programmers: was Announce: XML Schema - 6/28/2002 1:32:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] XHTML modularisation causes strange error with MSXML - 6/28/2002 1:41:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] XMLSchema for object programmers: was Announce: XML Schema - 6/28/2002 1:55:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] XMLSchema for object programmers: was Announce: XML Schema - 6/28/2002 2:46:00 PM
Are there any limits? (WAS: RE: [xml-dev] XMLSchema for object programmers: was Announce: XML Schema) - 6/28/2002 3:00:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] XHTML modularisation causes strange error with MSXML - 6/28/2002 4:11:00 PM
Unique XForms form that can ...instance data? - 6/29/2002 6:58:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] XHTML modularisation causes strange error with MSXML - 6/29/2002 10:15:00 AM
Error in XHTML Modularisation Recommendation? (was: RE: [xml-dev] XHTML modularisation causes strange error with MSXML) - 6/29/2002 11:02:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] Error in XHTML Modularisation Recommendation? (was: RE: [xml-dev] XHTML modularisation causes strange error with MSXML) - 6/29/2002 1:19:00 PM
Non-xml syntax for WXS - 6/29/2002 3:17:00 PM
XML Problem - 6/30/2002 4:14:00 PM
CHAT: Bagels and lox - 6/30/2002 8:48:00 PM
Re: Error in XHTML Modularisation Recommendation? - 6/30/2002 9:30:00 PM


transparent
Print
Mail
Like It
Disclaimer
.

These Archives are provided for informational purposes only and have been generated directly from the Altova mailing list archive system and are comprised of the lists set forth on www.altova.com/list/index.html. Therefore, Altova does not warrant or guarantee the accuracy, reliability, completeness, usefulness, non-infringement of intellectual property rights, or quality of any content on the Altova Mailing List Archive(s), regardless of who originates that content. You expressly understand and agree that you bear all risks associated with using or relying on that content. Altova will not be liable or responsible in any way for any content posted including, but not limited to, any errors or omissions in content, or for any losses or damage of any kind incurred as a result of the use of or reliance on any content. This disclaimer and limitation on liability is in addition to the disclaimers and limitations contained in the Website Terms of Use and elsewhere on the site.

.
.

transparent

transparent