Home. 
.

transparent

transparent

transparent

Altova Mailing List Archives

xml-dev



XML Standards Library 1.0 : Updated 1 May 2002 - 5/1/2002 4:53:00 AM
DOM support for expat - 5/1/2002 5:11:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Normalizing XML [was: XML information modeling best practices] - 5/1/2002 7:39:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] Normalizing XML [was: XML information modeling best practices] - 5/1/2002 8:12:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] Normalizing XML [was: XML information modeling best practices] - 5/1/2002 3:25:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] What is RDF for? (Was: What are Web Services for?) - 5/1/2002 8:31:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] The spirit of XML (was RE: [xml-dev] Re: I can XInclude where I [expletive deleted] wantto) - 5/1/2002 11:11:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] New XSLT, XPath, and XQuery drafts - 5/1/2002 1:54:00 PM
SV: [xml-dev] New XSLT, XPath, and XQuery drafts - but still no update? - 5/1/2002 2:19:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] SOAP and the Web - 5/1/2002 2:36:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] SOAP and the Web - 5/1/2002 4:24:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] SOAP and the Web - 5/1/2002 4:59:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] SOAP and the Web - 5/1/2002 9:52:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] SOAP and the Web - 5/2/2002 10:36:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] SOAP and the Web - 5/2/2002 11:37:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] SOAP and the Web - 5/2/2002 6:05:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] SOAP and the Web - 5/2/2002 6:21:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] SOAP and the Web - 5/2/2002 7:23:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] SOAP and the Web - 5/2/2002 8:34:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] SOAP and the Web - 5/2/2002 9:10:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] SOAP and the Web - 5/2/2002 9:29:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] SOAP and the Web - 5/2/2002 11:30:00 PM
[xml-dev] Re: I can XInclude where I [expletive deleted] want to - 5/1/2002 2:54:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Re: I can XInclude where I [expletive deleted] want to - 5/1/2002 3:21:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Re: I can XInclude where I [expletive deleted] wantto - 5/1/2002 4:02:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Re: I can XInclude where I [expletive deleted] wantto - 5/1/2002 4:37:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] SOAP and the Web - 5/1/2002 4:39:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] SOAP and the Web - 5/1/2002 6:00:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] SOAP and the Web - 5/1/2002 6:12:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] SOAP and the Web - 5/1/2002 6:44:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] SOAP and the Web - 5/1/2002 7:10:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Re: I can XInclude where I bloody want to - 5/1/2002 7:17:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Re: I can XInclude where I bloody want to - 5/1/2002 8:49:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Re: I can XInclude where I bloody want to - 5/2/2002 8:45:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] SOAP and the Web - 5/1/2002 7:26:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] SOAP and the Web - 5/1/2002 7:32:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] SOAP and the Web - 5/1/2002 7:37:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Re: I can XInclude where I [expletive deleted] want to - 5/1/2002 7:53:00 PM
XML updates on xml.startkabel - 5/1/2002 8:44:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] SOAP and the Web - 5/1/2002 9:56:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] The spirit of XML (was RE: [xml-dev] Re: I can XInclude where I [expletive deleted] wantto) - 5/1/2002 9:58:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] SOAP and the Web - 5/1/2002 10:17:00 PM
Google License Key - 5/1/2002 11:21:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Google License Key - 5/1/2002 11:26:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] SOAP and the Web - 5/2/2002 12:59:00 AM
xsl:include - 5/2/2002 4:17:00 AM
SV: SV: [xml-dev] New XSLT, XPath, and XQuery drafts - but still no update? - 5/2/2002 8:35:00 AM
Yet another plea for XUpdate (was New XSLT, XPath, and XQuery drafts - but still no update?) - 5/2/2002 7:42:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Yet another plea for XUpdate (was New XSLT, XPath, and XQuery drafts - but still no update?) - 5/2/2002 8:00:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Yet another plea for XUpdate (was New XSLT, XPath, and XQuery drafts - but still no update?) - 5/2/2002 8:37:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Web Service Business Questions - 5/2/2002 9:50:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] What is RDF for? (Was: What are Web Services for?) - 5/2/2002 9:53:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] What is RDF for? (Was: What are Web Services for?) - 5/2/2002 10:09:00 AM
Diff between Character reference and Entity Ref. - 5/2/2002 10:11:00 AM
RE: Diff between Character reference and Entity Ref. - 5/2/2002 10:28:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] Re: I can XInclude where I bloody want to - 5/2/2002 11:05:00 AM
FW: [xml-dev] Diff between Character reference and Entity Ref. - 5/2/2002 11:17:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] SOAP and the Web - 5/2/2002 12:10:00 PM
Updates in XQuery 1.0 & the future of the XML Activity - 5/2/2002 12:14:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] SOAP and the Web - 5/2/2002 1:49:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] SOAP and the Web - 5/2/2002 1:56:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] SOAP and the Web - 5/2/2002 2:21:00 PM
XML Conference & Exposition 2002; Call for Presentations, Tutorials, Exhibits, and Sponsors - 5/2/2002 4:02:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] SOAP and the Web - 5/2/2002 5:13:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] SOAP and the Web - 5/2/2002 6:10:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] SOAP and the Web - 5/2/2002 6:18:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] SOAP and the Web - 5/2/2002 6:34:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Normalizing XML [was: XML information modeling best practices] - 5/2/2002 6:37:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] SOAP and the Web - 5/2/2002 7:01:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] SOAP and the Web - 5/2/2002 7:16:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] SOAP and the Web - 5/2/2002 7:27:00 PM
Out of topic or out of interest? - 5/2/2002 8:38:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Out of topic or out of interest? - 5/2/2002 9:04:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Out of topic or out of interest? - 5/3/2002 3:55:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Out of topic or out of interest? - 5/3/2002 1:44:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Out of topic or out of interest? - 5/3/2002 1:54:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Out of topic or out of interest? - 5/3/2002 2:36:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Out of topic or out of interest? - 5/3/2002 3:09:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Out of topic or out of interest? - 5/4/2002 2:33:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Out of topic or out of interest? - 5/4/2002 4:25:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Out of topic or out of interest? - 5/4/2002 6:14:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Out of topic or out of interest? - 5/3/2002 3:01:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Out of topic or out of interest? - 5/4/2002 6:10:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Out of topic or out of interest? - 5/4/2002 7:25:00 AM
markup (was Re: [xml-dev] Out of topic or out of interest?) - 5/4/2002 11:56:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] markup (was Re: [xml-dev] Out of topic or out of interest?) - 5/4/2002 12:56:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Out of topic or out of interest? - 5/2/2002 9:26:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Out of topic or out of interest? - 5/2/2002 10:53:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Out of topic or out of interest? - 5/2/2002 11:10:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] SOAP and the Web - 5/2/2002 8:57:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Out of topic or out of interest? - 5/2/2002 9:29:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Out of topic or out of interest? - 5/2/2002 9:31:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Out of topic or out of interest? - 5/2/2002 9:43:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Google License Key - 5/2/2002 10:06:00 PM
New Conference: PLAN-X: PROGRAMMING LANGUAGE TECHNOLOGIES FOR XML - 5/3/2002 1:03:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Transaction-safe XML-CLOB Update - 5/3/2002 8:49:00 AM
Microsoft & SVG - 5/3/2002 9:43:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] Testing Tool - Filling In Documents. - 5/3/2002 12:15:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Out of topic or out of interest? - 5/3/2002 1:38:00 PM
PDF 2 XML - 5/3/2002 1:46:00 PM
OASIS announcement of LegalXML Integrated Justice discussion list - 5/3/2002 2:03:00 PM
Experiment about resolving Accepted content header - 5/3/2002 2:15:00 PM
SV: [xml-dev] Who'e expecting to use XQuery? (was Re: [xml-dev] Yet another plea forupdate) - 5/3/2002 2:25:00 PM
Integration By InfoSet Abstractions (WAS RE: [xml-dev] Out of topic or out of interest?) - 5/3/2002 2:54:00 PM
Fw: ScanMail Message: To Sender, sensitive content found and action taken. - 5/3/2002 3:04:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Out of topic or out of interest? - 5/3/2002 3:25:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Out of topic or out of interest? - 5/3/2002 3:56:00 PM
Standards for Transactions - 5/3/2002 3:57:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Yet another plea for XUpdate (was New XSLT, XPath, and XQuery drafts - but still no update?) - 5/3/2002 5:53:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Yet another plea for XUpdate (was New XSLT, XPath, and XQuery drafts - but still no update?) - 5/3/2002 5:58:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Out of topic or out of interest? - 5/3/2002 6:47:00 PM
New approach - 5/3/2002 9:08:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Yet another plea for XUpdate (was New XSLT, XPath, and XQuery drafts - but still no update?) - 5/4/2002 5:14:00 AM
XQuery types was Re: [xml-dev] Yet another plea for XUpdate... - 5/4/2002 2:22:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] XQuery types was Re: [xml-dev] Yet another plea for XUpdate... - 5/4/2002 5:23:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] XQuery types was Re: [xml-dev] Yet another plea for XUpdate... - 5/5/2002 1:56:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] XQuery types was Re: [xml-dev] Yet another plea for XUpdate... - 5/5/2002 3:38:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] XQuery types was Re: [xml-dev] Yet another plea for XUpdate... - 5/5/2002 1:12:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] XQuery types was Re: [xml-dev] Yet another plea for XUpdate... - 5/5/2002 3:24:00 PM
Semantics was Re: [xml-dev] XQuery types ... - 5/5/2002 7:55:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] XQuery types was Re: [xml-dev] Yet another plea for XUpdate... - 5/5/2002 4:21:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] XQuery types was Re: [xml-dev] Yet another plea for XUpdate... - 5/5/2002 6:25:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] XQuery types was Re: [xml-dev] Yet another plea for XUpdate... - 5/5/2002 8:09:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] XQuery types was Re: [xml-dev] Yet another plea for XUpdate... - 5/5/2002 7:26:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] XQuery types - 5/5/2002 4:27:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] XQuery types was Re: [xml-dev] Yet another plea forXUpdate... - 5/6/2002 1:17:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] XQuery types was Re: [xml-dev] Yet another plea for XUpdate... - 5/6/2002 3:35:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] XQuery types was Re: [xml-dev] Yet another plea for XUpdate... - 5/6/2002 3:56:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] XQuery types was Re: [xml-dev] Yet another plea for XUpdate... - 5/7/2002 3:39:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] XQuery types was Re: [xml-dev] Yet another plea for XUpdate... - 5/6/2002 3:38:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] XQuery types was Re: [xml-dev] Yet another plea for XUpdate... - 5/6/2002 3:29:00 PM
[xml-dev] New approach - 5/4/2002 7:44:00 AM
Call for example of server enabled for XML multiple representations - 5/4/2002 1:07:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Call for example of server enabled for XML multiple representations - 5/4/2002 6:49:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Call for example of server enabled for XML multiple representations - 5/4/2002 7:02:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Call for example of server enabled for XML multiplerepresentations - 5/4/2002 7:13:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Call for example of server enabled for XML multiple representations - 5/4/2002 9:09:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Call for example of server enabled for XML multiple representations - 5/4/2002 9:46:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Call for example of server enabled for XML multiple representations - 5/4/2002 10:10:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Out of topic or out of interest? - 5/4/2002 5:24:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] XQuery types was Re: [xml-dev] Yet another plea for XUpdate... - 5/5/2002 8:03:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Semantics was Re: [xml-dev] XQuery types ... - 5/5/2002 8:21:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] XQuery types was Re: [xml-dev] Yet another plea for XUpdate... - 5/5/2002 8:27:00 PM
How to insert data from HTML form into an XML file -- newbee help - 5/5/2002 9:59:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] XQuery types was Re: [xml-dev] Yet another plea for XUpdate... - 5/6/2002 4:25:00 AM
SV: SV: [xml-dev] Who'e expecting to use XQuery? (was Re: [xml-dev] Yet another plea forupdate) - 5/6/2002 10:46:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] XQuery types was Re: [xml-dev] Yet another plea for XUpdate... - 5/6/2002 3:47:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] XQuery types was Re: [xml-dev] Yet another plea for XUpdate... - 5/6/2002 7:25:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] XQuery types was Re: [xml-dev] Yet another plea for XUpdate... - 5/6/2002 7:44:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] typing and markup (was Re: [xml-dev] XQuery types) - 5/6/2002 9:10:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] typing and markup (was Re: [xml-dev] XQuery types) - 5/6/2002 9:25:00 PM
XPath 1.5? (was RE: [xml-dev] typing and markup) - 5/6/2002 11:24:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] XPath 1.5? (was RE: [xml-dev] typing and markup) - 5/7/2002 8:40:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] XPath 1.5? (was RE: [xml-dev] typing and markup) - 5/7/2002 8:59:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] XPath 1.5? (was RE: [xml-dev] typing and markup) - 5/7/2002 9:58:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] XPath 1.5? (was RE: [xml-dev] typing and markup) - 5/7/2002 1:52:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] XPath 1.5? (was RE: [xml-dev] typing and markup) - 5/7/2002 2:20:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] XPath 1.5? (was RE: [xml-dev] typing and markup) - 5/7/2002 10:20:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] XPath 1.5? (was RE: [xml-dev] typing and markup) - 5/7/2002 11:46:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] XPath 1.5? (was RE: [xml-dev] typing and markup) - 5/7/2002 12:25:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] XPath 1.5? (was RE: [xml-dev] typing and markup) - 5/7/2002 2:52:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] XPath 1.5? (was RE: [xml-dev] typing and markup) - 5/7/2002 2:02:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] XPath 1.5? (was RE: [xml-dev] typing and markup) - 5/7/2002 2:35:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] XPath 1.5? (was RE: [xml-dev] typing and markup) - 5/7/2002 6:05:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] XPath 1.5? (was RE: [xml-dev] typing and markup) - 5/7/2002 2:42:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] XPath 1.5? (was RE: [xml-dev] typing and markup) - 5/7/2002 4:25:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] XPath 1.5? (was RE: [xml-dev] typing and markup) - 5/7/2002 5:05:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] XPath 1.5? (was RE: [xml-dev] typing and markup) - 5/7/2002 6:09:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] XPath 1.5? (was RE: [xml-dev] typing and markup) - 5/7/2002 7:00:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] XPath 1.5? (was RE: [xml-dev] typing and markup) - 5/7/2002 4:38:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] XPath 1.5? (was RE: [xml-dev] typing and markup) - 5/7/2002 4:40:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] XPath 1.5? (was RE: [xml-dev] typing and markup) - 5/7/2002 4:57:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] XPath 1.5? (was RE: [xml-dev] typing and markup) - 5/7/2002 9:01:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] XPath 1.5? (was RE: [xml-dev] typing and markup) - 5/8/2002 12:16:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] XPath 1.5? (was RE: [xml-dev] typing and markup) - 5/8/2002 1:54:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] XPath 1.5? (was RE: [xml-dev] typing and markup) - 5/8/2002 6:01:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] XPath 1.5? (was RE: [xml-dev] typing and markup) - 5/9/2002 1:44:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] XPath 1.5? (was RE: [xml-dev] typing and markup) - 5/9/2002 2:22:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] XPath 1.5? (was RE: [xml-dev] typing and markup) - 5/9/2002 8:43:00 PM
XPath 2.0 - how much of XQuery should it include? - 5/9/2002 8:48:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] XPath 2.0 - how much of XQuery should it include? - 5/9/2002 10:59:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] XPath 2.0 - how much of XQuery should it include? - 5/9/2002 11:09:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] XPath 2.0 - how much of XQuery should it include? - 5/10/2002 1:04:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] XPath 2.0 - how much of XQuery should it include? - 5/10/2002 1:41:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] XPath 2.0 - how much of XQuery should it include? - 5/10/2002 2:57:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] XPath 2.0 - how much of XQuery should it include? - 5/11/2002 3:37:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] XPath 2.0 - how much of XQuery should it include? - 5/10/2002 11:08:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] XPath 1.5? (was RE: [xml-dev] typing and markup) - 5/9/2002 8:50:00 PM
Re: XPath 2.0 - how much of XQuery should it include? - 5/9/2002 9:06:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Re: XPath 2.0 - how much of XQuery should it include? - 5/9/2002 10:07:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] XPath 2.0 - how much of XQuery should it include? - 5/9/2002 11:55:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] XPath 2.0 - how much of XQuery should it include? - 5/10/2002 5:24:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] XPath 2.0 - how much of XQuery should it include? - 5/10/2002 9:34:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] XPath 2.0 - how much of XQuery should it include? - 5/10/2002 1:58:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] XPath 2.0 - how much of XQuery should it include? - 5/10/2002 2:46:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] XPath 2.0 - how much of XQuery should it include? - 5/11/2002 5:11:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] XPath 2.0 - how much of XQuery should it include? - 5/11/2002 5:54:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] XPath 2.0 - how much of XQuery should it include? - 5/10/2002 12:22:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] XPath 2.0 - how much of XQuery should it include? - 5/10/2002 1:08:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] XPath 2.0 - how much of XQuery should it include? - 5/10/2002 3:15:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] XPath 2.0 - how much of XQuery should it include? - 5/10/2002 3:27:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] XPath 2.0 - how much of XQuery should it include? - 5/10/2002 5:26:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] XPath 2.0 - how much of XQuery should it include? - 5/13/2002 3:16:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] XPath 2.0 - how much of XQuery should it include? - 5/10/2002 4:55:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] XPath 2.0 - how much of XQuery should it include? - 5/13/2002 2:06:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] XPath 2.0 - how much of XQuery should it include? - 5/13/2002 1:24:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] XPath 2.0 - how much of XQuery should it include? - 5/10/2002 1:06:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] XPath 2.0 - how much of XQuery should it include? - 5/10/2002 1:37:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] XPath 2.0 - how much of XQuery should it include? - 5/10/2002 8:24:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] XPath 2.0 - how much of XQuery should it include? - 5/10/2002 8:32:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] XPath 2.0 - how much of XQuery should it include? - 5/10/2002 10:10:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] XPath 2.0 - how much of XQuery should it include? - 5/10/2002 1:44:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] XPath 2.0 - how much of XQuery should it include? - 5/10/2002 10:46:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] XPath 2.0 - how much of XQuery should it include? - 5/10/2002 11:09:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] XPath 2.0 - how much of XQuery should it include? - 5/10/2002 11:46:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] XPath 2.0 - how much of XQuery should it include? - 5/10/2002 11:57:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] XPath 2.0 - how much of XQuery should it include? - 5/10/2002 1:12:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] XPath 1.5? (was RE: [xml-dev] typing and markup) - 5/9/2002 2:27:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] XPath 1.5? (was RE: [xml-dev] typing and markup) - 5/9/2002 2:56:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] XPath 1.5? (was RE: [xml-dev] typing and markup) - 5/9/2002 5:42:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] XPath 1.5? (was RE: [xml-dev] typing and markup) - 5/8/2002 11:16:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] XPath 1.5? (was RE: [xml-dev] typing and markup) - 5/9/2002 12:57:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] XPath 1.5? (was RE: [xml-dev] typing and markup) - 5/9/2002 12:27:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] XPath 1.5? (was RE: [xml-dev] typing and markup) - 5/8/2002 2:46:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] XPath 1.5? (was RE: [xml-dev] typing and markup) - 5/8/2002 3:12:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] XPath 1.5? (was RE: [xml-dev] typing and markup) - 5/8/2002 3:35:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] XPath 1.5? (was RE: [xml-dev] typing and markup) - 5/8/2002 4:43:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] XPath 1.5? (was RE: [xml-dev] typing and markup) - 5/8/2002 5:06:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] XPath 1.5? (was RE: [xml-dev] typing and markup) - 5/9/2002 1:29:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] XPath 1.5? (was RE: [xml-dev] typing and markup) - 5/10/2002 9:48:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] XPath 1.5? (was RE: [xml-dev] typing and markup) - 5/8/2002 6:15:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] XPath 1.5? (was RE: [xml-dev] typing and markup) - 5/7/2002 2:53:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] XPath 1.5? (was RE: [xml-dev] typing and markup) - 5/7/2002 3:07:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] typing and markup (was Re: [xml-dev] XQuery types) - 5/12/2002 9:43:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] typing and markup (was Re: [xml-dev] XQuery types) - 5/13/2002 2:01:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] XQuery types was Re: [xml-dev] Yet another plea for XUpdate... - 5/7/2002 4:13:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] XQuery types was Re: [xml-dev] Yet another plea for XUpdate... - 5/7/2002 9:01:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] XQuery types was Re: [xml-dev] Yet another plea for XUpdate... - 5/7/2002 2:56:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] XPath 1.5? (was RE: [xml-dev] typing and markup) - 5/7/2002 11:54:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] XPath 1.5? (was RE: [xml-dev] typing and markup) - 5/7/2002 1:37:00 PM
working with text (was RE: [xml-dev] XPath 1.5?) - 5/7/2002 1:53:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] XPath 1.5? (was RE: [xml-dev] typing and markup) - 5/7/2002 2:57:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] XPath 1.5? (was RE: [xml-dev] typing and markup) - 5/7/2002 2:57:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] XPath 1.5? (was RE: [xml-dev] typing and markup) - 5/7/2002 3:11:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] XPath 1.5? (was RE: [xml-dev] typing and markup) - 5/7/2002 4:10:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] XPath 1.5? (was RE: [xml-dev] typing and markup) - 5/7/2002 4:37:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] XPath 1.5? (was RE: [xml-dev] typing and markup) - 5/7/2002 4:39:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] XPath 1.5? (was RE: [xml-dev] typing and markup) - 5/7/2002 4:43:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] XPath 1.5? (was RE: [xml-dev] typing and markup) - 5/7/2002 4:58:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] XPath 1.5? (was RE: [xml-dev] typing and markup) - 5/7/2002 5:02:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] XPath 1.5? (was RE: [xml-dev] typing and markup) - 5/7/2002 5:08:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] XPath 1.5? (was RE: [xml-dev] typing and markup) - 5/8/2002 12:29:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] XPath 1.5? (was RE: [xml-dev] typing and markup) - 5/8/2002 8:37:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] XPath 1.5? (was RE: [xml-dev] typing and markup) - 5/9/2002 1:11:00 AM
RE: working with text (was RE: [xml-dev] XPath 1.5?) - 5/7/2002 2:11:00 PM
Last Call: Interop Summit Call For Papers - 5/7/2002 3:01:00 PM
Crystallization? - 5/7/2002 3:25:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] XPath 1.5? (was RE: [xml-dev] typing and markup) - 5/7/2002 3:33:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Crystallization? - 5/7/2002 4:25:00 PM
RE: working with text (was RE: [xml-dev] XPath 1.5?) - 5/7/2002 4:36:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] XPath 1.5? (was RE: [xml-dev] typing and markup) - 5/7/2002 4:57:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] XPath 1.5? (was RE: [xml-dev] typing and markup) - 5/7/2002 5:19:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] XPath 1.5? (was RE: [xml-dev] typing and markup) - 5/7/2002 6:08:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] XPath 1.5? (was RE: [xml-dev] typing and markup) - 5/7/2002 6:52:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] XPath 1.5? (was RE: [xml-dev] typing and markup) - 5/8/2002 8:40:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] XPath 1.5? (was RE: [xml-dev] typing and markup) - 5/8/2002 9:19:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] XPath 1.5? (was RE: [xml-dev] typing and markup) - 5/8/2002 11:18:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] XPath 1.5? (was RE: [xml-dev] typing and markup) - 5/8/2002 11:39:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] XPath 1.5? (was RE: [xml-dev] typing and markup) - 5/8/2002 12:15:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] XPath 1.5? (was RE: [xml-dev] typing and markup) - 5/8/2002 1:09:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] XPath 1.5? (was RE: [xml-dev] typing and markup) - 5/8/2002 1:49:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] XPath 1.5? (was RE: [xml-dev] typing and markup) - 5/8/2002 2:09:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] XPath 1.5? (was RE: [xml-dev] typing and markup) - 5/8/2002 2:29:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] XPath 1.5? (was RE: [xml-dev] typing and markup) - 5/8/2002 3:15:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] XPath 1.5? (was RE: [xml-dev] typing and markup) - 5/8/2002 7:34:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] XPath 1.5? (was RE: [xml-dev] typing and markup) - 5/9/2002 8:56:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] XPath 1.5? (was RE: [xml-dev] typing and markup) - 5/7/2002 5:44:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] XPath 1.5? (was RE: [xml-dev] typing and markup) - 5/7/2002 5:51:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] XQuery types was Re: [xml-dev] Yet another plea for XUpdate... - 5/7/2002 6:14:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] XPath 1.5? (was RE: [xml-dev] typing and markup) - 5/7/2002 6:19:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] RE: working with text (was RE: [xml-dev] XPath 1.5?) - 5/7/2002 6:23:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] XPath 1.5? (was RE: [xml-dev] typing and markup) - 5/7/2002 6:36:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] XPath 1.5? (was RE: [xml-dev] typing and markup) - 5/7/2002 6:42:00 PM
Is XML-REST more scalable than SOAP? - 5/7/2002 6:47:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] XQuery types was Re: [xml-dev] Yet another plea for XUpdate... - 5/7/2002 7:01:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] XQuery types was Re: [xml-dev] Yet another plea for XUpdate... - 5/7/2002 7:52:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] XPath 1.5? (was RE: [xml-dev] typing and markup) - 5/7/2002 7:55:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] XPath 1.5? (was RE: [xml-dev] typing and markup) - 5/7/2002 7:57:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] PDF 2 XML - 5/7/2002 8:33:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] XPath 1.5? (was RE: [xml-dev] typing and markup) - 5/7/2002 8:50:00 PM
Multibyte output - 5/7/2002 9:12:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] XPath 1.5? (was RE: [xml-dev] typing and markup) - 5/7/2002 9:31:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Multibyte output - 5/7/2002 9:33:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] XQuery types was Re: [xml-dev] Yet another plea for XUpdate... - 5/7/2002 9:46:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] XQuery types was Re: [xml-dev] Yet another plea for XUpdate... - 5/7/2002 10:00:00 PM
Xpath engine running over DOM API - 5/7/2002 10:13:00 PM
OT: Static/dynamic typing - 5/7/2002 11:19:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] XPath 1.5? (was RE: [xml-dev] typing and markup) - 5/7/2002 11:21:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] XQuery types was Re: [xml-dev] Yet another plea for XUpdate... - 5/7/2002 11:36:00 PM
modest PSVI suggestion - 5/8/2002 1:22:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] OT: Static/dynamic typing - 5/8/2002 4:16:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] XPath 1.5? (was RE: [xml-dev] typing and markup) - 5/8/2002 4:33:00 AM
Unused features and interop (was RE: [xml-dev] XPath 1.5? (was RE: [xml-dev] typing and markup)) - 5/8/2002 6:54:00 AM
Standard for Customer references in XML? - 5/8/2002 8:33:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] Multibyte output - 5/8/2002 1:13:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] XPath 1.5? (was RE: [xml-dev] typing and markup) - 5/8/2002 1:34:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] RE: PSVI and XPath 2.0 data model - 5/8/2002 1:50:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] XPath 1.5? (was RE: [xml-dev] typing and markup) - 5/8/2002 1:51:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] XQuery types was Re: [xml-dev] Yet another plea for XUpdate... - 5/8/2002 2:01:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] XPath 1.5? (was RE: [xml-dev] typing and markup) - 5/8/2002 2:04:00 PM
schemas and transforms, was: Path 1.5? (was typing and markup) - 5/8/2002 2:44:00 PM
Ann: XML Schema languageS tutorial - 5/8/2002 3:25:00 PM
Re: schemas and transforms, was: Path 1.5? (was typing and markup) - 5/8/2002 3:51:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] XQuery types was Re: [xml-dev] Yet another plea for XUpdate... - 5/8/2002 5:20:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Is XML-REST more scalable than SOAP? - 5/8/2002 5:46:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Is XML-REST more scalable than SOAP? - 5/8/2002 6:06:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] XQuery types was Re: [xml-dev] Yet another plea for XUpdate... - 5/8/2002 6:12:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] XQuery types was Re: [xml-dev] Yet another plea for XUpdate... - 5/8/2002 6:13:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] XQuery types was Re: [xml-dev] Yet another plea for XUpdate... - 5/8/2002 6:13:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] XQuery types was Re: [xml-dev] Yet another plea for XUpdate... - 5/8/2002 6:28:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] XPath 1.5? (was RE: [xml-dev] typing and markup) - 5/8/2002 6:40:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] XQuery types was Re: [xml-dev] Yet another plea for XUpdate... - 5/8/2002 6:48:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Is XML-REST more scalable than SOAP? - 5/8/2002 7:02:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] RE: working with text (was RE: [xml-dev] XPath 1.5?) - 5/9/2002 2:02:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] RE: working with text (was RE: [xml-dev] XPath 1.5? ) - 5/9/2002 3:04:00 PM
IE5 vs. IE6 - XSLT - 5/9/2002 3:07:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] RE: working with text (was RE: [xml-dev] XPath 1.5? ) - 5/9/2002 3:17:00 PM
PSVI formalization - 5/9/2002 3:20:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] PSVI formalization - 5/9/2002 4:46:00 PM
W3C XML Core WG requests comment: control characters in XML 1.1 - 5/9/2002 5:25:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] PSVI formalization - 5/9/2002 5:31:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] PSVI formalization - 5/9/2002 5:55:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] PSVI formalization - 5/9/2002 6:11:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] PSVI formalization - 5/9/2002 6:17:00 PM
Kin Recognition: Why XML 1.0 Is Core and Everything Else is Optional - 5/9/2002 7:00:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] PSVI formalization - 5/9/2002 7:07:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] PSVI formalization - 5/9/2002 7:13:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] PSVI formalization - 5/9/2002 7:18:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] IE5 vs. IE6 - XSLT - 5/9/2002 7:38:00 PM
OASIS TC Call For Participation: Controlled Trade TC - 5/9/2002 8:19:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] PSVI formalization - 5/9/2002 9:26:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] PSVI formalization - 5/9/2002 9:28:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] XPath 2.0 - how much of XQuery should it include? - 5/9/2002 9:29:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] PSVI formalization - 5/9/2002 9:40:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] PSVI formalization - 5/9/2002 10:46:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] XPath 2.0 - how much of XQuery should it include? - 5/10/2002 12:37:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] PSVI formalization - 5/10/2002 12:58:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] PSVI formalization - 5/10/2002 1:16:00 AM
A modest conception of the Semantic Web - 5/10/2002 4:10:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] PSVI formalization - 5/10/2002 7:18:00 AM
SAX XPath Filter - 5/10/2002 8:31:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] PSVI formalization - 5/10/2002 8:56:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] PSVI formalization - 5/10/2002 9:12:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] PSVI formalization - 5/10/2002 10:32:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] PSVI formalization - 5/10/2002 1:00:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] PSVI formalization - 5/10/2002 1:21:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] PSVI formalization - 5/10/2002 1:31:00 PM
Web Services Mapping Capabilities? - 5/10/2002 1:32:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] PSVI formalization - 5/10/2002 1:44:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Web Services Mapping Capabilities? - 5/10/2002 1:45:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] PSVI formalization - 5/10/2002 1:52:00 PM
Re: A modest conception of the Semantic Web - 5/10/2002 2:00:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Re: A modest conception of the Semantic Web - 5/10/2002 2:14:00 PM
What is the XPath Task Force? - 5/10/2002 2:46:00 PM
Patent non-proliferation and disarmament - 5/10/2002 2:49:00 PM
The vision for XPath 2.0 - 5/10/2002 3:05:00 PM
Stopping the SAX parser - 5/10/2002 3:21:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] The vision for XPath 2.0 - 5/10/2002 4:07:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] The vision for XPath 2.0 - 5/10/2002 4:21:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Patent non-proliferation and disarmament - 5/10/2002 4:30:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Tim Bray on "Which Technologies Matter?" - 5/10/2002 4:44:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] PSVI formalization - 5/10/2002 5:53:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] The vision for XPath 2.0 - 5/10/2002 5:57:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Patent non-proliferation and disarmament - 5/10/2002 6:28:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] XPath 2.0 - how much of XQuery should it include? - 5/10/2002 7:10:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] XPath 2.0 - how much of XQuery should it include? - 5/10/2002 7:42:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] XPath 2.0 - how much of XQuery should it include? - 5/10/2002 7:49:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] XPath 2.0 - how much of XQuery should it include? - 5/10/2002 8:21:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] frustration (was RE: [xml-dev] XPath 2.0 ) - 5/10/2002 9:31:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] frustration (was RE: [xml-dev] XPath 2.0 ) - 5/13/2002 2:47:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] frustration (was RE: [xml-dev] XPath 2.0 ) - 5/13/2002 11:31:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] frustration (was RE: [xml-dev] XPath 2.0 ) - 5/14/2002 12:20:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] frustration (was RE: [xml-dev] XPath 2.0 ) - 5/14/2002 12:34:00 AM
Move type info to a separate spec? - 5/14/2002 3:05:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] frustration (was RE: [xml-dev] XPath 2.0 ) - 5/14/2002 12:07:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] frustration (was RE: [xml-dev] XPath 2.0 ) - 5/13/2002 10:55:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] frustration (was RE: [xml-dev] XPath 2.0 ) - 5/10/2002 9:42:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] frustration (was RE: [xml-dev] XPath 2.0 ) - 5/10/2002 10:05:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] frustration (was RE: [xml-dev] XPath 2.0 ) - 5/11/2002 7:45:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] frustration (was RE: [xml-dev] XPath 2.0 ) - 5/11/2002 5:39:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] XPath 2.0 - how much of XQuery should it include? - 5/13/2002 1:09:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] XPath 2.0 - how much of XQuery should it include? - 5/13/2002 2:05:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] XPath 2.0 - how much of XQuery should it include? - 5/13/2002 4:24:00 PM
frustration (was RE: [xml-dev] XPath 2.0 ) - 5/10/2002 8:46:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] XPath 2.0 - how much of XQuery should it include? - 5/10/2002 11:17:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] XPath 2.0 - how much of XQuery should it include? - 5/11/2002 2:10:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] XPath 2.0 - how much of XQuery should it include? - 5/12/2002 10:10:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] XPath 2.0 - how much of XQuery should it include? - 5/13/2002 9:27:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] XPath 2.0 - how much of XQuery should it include? - 5/13/2002 9:43:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] XPath 2.0 - how much of XQuery should it include? - 5/13/2002 10:02:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] XPath 2.0 - how much of XQuery should it include? - 5/13/2002 1:15:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] XPath 2.0 - how much of XQuery should it include? - 5/13/2002 7:06:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] XPath 2.0 - how much of XQuery should it include? - 5/13/2002 7:18:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] XPath 2.0 - how much of XQuery should it include? - 5/14/2002 7:40:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] XPath 2.0 - how much of XQuery should it include? - 5/14/2002 7:43:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] XPath 2.0 - how much of XQuery should it include? - 5/11/2002 6:10:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] XPath 2.0 - how much of XQuery should it include? - 5/10/2002 7:11:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Patent non-proliferation and disarmament - 5/10/2002 9:31:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Patent non-proliferation and disarmament - 5/11/2002 7:26:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] Patent non-proliferation and disarmament - 5/12/2002 1:12:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Patent non-proliferation and disarmament - 5/12/2002 12:44:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Patent non-proliferation and disarmament - 5/12/2002 6:06:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Patent non-proliferation and disarmament - 5/12/2002 8:43:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Patent non-proliferation and disarmament - 5/13/2002 5:23:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Patent non-proliferation and disarmament - 5/13/2002 2:25:00 PM
Request for XQuery Mission Document to be made public - 5/10/2002 9:38:00 PM
Start on XML - 5/10/2002 9:50:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] PSVI formalization - 5/10/2002 10:24:00 PM
Last one unscribing from XML-DEV, please turn out the light... - 5/11/2002 4:33:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] PSVI formalization - 5/11/2002 5:05:00 AM
Huge Specs and Good Communication - 5/11/2002 9:09:00 AM
Request for XPath 2.0 Vision Document - 5/11/2002 9:10:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] XPath 2.0 - how much of XQuery should it include? - 5/11/2002 9:21:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] frustration (was RE: [xml-dev] XPath 2.0 ) - 5/11/2002 10:05:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] XPath 2.0 - how much of XQuery should it include? - 5/11/2002 10:26:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] XPath 2.0 - how much of XQuery should it include? - 5/11/2002 10:28:00 AM
XSLT 2.0 / XPath 2.0 - Assumptions - 5/12/2002 11:31:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] XSLT 2.0 / XPath 2.0 - Assumptions - 5/12/2002 2:44:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] XSLT 2.0 / XPath 2.0 - Assumptions - 5/12/2002 3:14:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] XSLT 2.0 / XPath 2.0 - Assumptions - 5/12/2002 3:26:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] XSLT 2.0 / XPath 2.0 - Assumptions - 5/12/2002 4:40:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] XSLT 2.0 / XPath 2.0 - Assumptions - 5/12/2002 6:11:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] XSLT 2.0 / XPath 2.0 - Assumptions - 5/13/2002 1:56:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] XSLT 2.0 / XPath 2.0 - Assumptions - 5/13/2002 3:01:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] XSLT 2.0 / XPath 2.0 - Assumptions - 5/13/2002 5:40:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] XSLT 2.0 / XPath 2.0 - Assumptions - 5/13/2002 6:04:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] XSLT 2.0 / XPath 2.0 - Assumptions - 5/13/2002 6:24:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] XSLT 2.0 / XPath 2.0 - Assumptions - 5/13/2002 6:48:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] XSLT 2.0 / XPath 2.0 - Assumptions - 5/13/2002 7:11:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] XSLT 2.0 / XPath 2.0 - Assumptions - 5/13/2002 7:32:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] XSLT 2.0 / XPath 2.0 - Assumptions - 5/13/2002 7:38:00 PM
XML/XQuery Usage Assumptions (was Re: [xml-dev] XSLT 2.0 / XPath 2.0 -Assumptions) - 5/13/2002 8:51:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] XSLT 2.0 / XPath 2.0 - Assumptions - 5/13/2002 7:07:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] XSLT 2.0 / XPath 2.0 - Assumptions - 5/13/2002 8:30:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] XSLT 2.0 / XPath 2.0 - Assumptions - 5/13/2002 6:32:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] XSLT 2.0 / XPath 2.0 - Assumptions - 5/13/2002 3:26:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] XSLT 2.0 / XPath 2.0 - Assumptions - 5/13/2002 5:50:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] XSLT 2.0 / XPath 2.0 - Assumptions - 5/13/2002 6:29:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] XSLT 2.0 / XPath 2.0 - Assumptions - 5/13/2002 6:47:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] XSLT 2.0 / XPath 2.0 - Assumptions - 5/13/2002 8:36:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] XSLT 2.0 / XPath 2.0 - Assumptions - 5/13/2002 6:51:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] XSLT 2.0 / XPath 2.0 - Assumptions - 5/13/2002 6:37:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] XSLT 2.0 / XPath 2.0 - Assumptions - 5/13/2002 4:46:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] XSLT 2.0 / XPath 2.0 - Assumptions - 5/13/2002 6:22:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] XSLT 2.0 / XPath 2.0 - Assumptions - 5/13/2002 5:40:00 PM
[Off-Topic] Invisible Foot (Re: [xml-dev] XSLT 2.0 / XPath 2.0 - Assumptions) - 5/12/2002 6:23:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] XSLT 2.0 / XPath 2.0 - Assumptions - 5/13/2002 9:32:00 AM
Re: XSLT 2.0 / XPath 2.0 - Assumptions - 5/13/2002 1:38:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] PSVI formalization - 5/12/2002 11:56:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] XSLT 2.0 / XPath 2.0 - Assumptions - 5/12/2002 4:55:00 PM
XSLT 2.0 and XSL(-FO) 2.0 - 5/12/2002 5:15:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] XSLT 2.0 and XSL(-FO) 2.0 - 5/12/2002 7:11:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] XSLT 2.0 and XSL(-FO) 2.0 - 5/12/2002 10:56:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] XSLT 2.0 and XSL(-FO) 2.0 - 5/13/2002 7:17:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] XSLT 2.0 and XSL(-FO) 2.0 - 5/13/2002 9:28:00 AM
How to spell "No PSVI" in XSLT 2.0 ? - 5/13/2002 2:48:00 PM
Re: How to spell "No PSVI" in XSLT 2.0 ? - 5/13/2002 3:07:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] How to spell "No PSVI" in XSLT 2.0 ? - 5/13/2002 3:57:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] How to spell "No PSVI" in XSLT 2.0 ? - 5/13/2002 4:09:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] How to spell "No PSVI" in XSLT 2.0 ? - 5/13/2002 4:39:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] How to spell "No PSVI" in XSLT 2.0 ? - 5/13/2002 4:45:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] How to spell "No PSVI" in XSLT 2.0 ? - 5/13/2002 5:22:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] How to spell "No PSVI" in XSLT 2.0 ? - 5/13/2002 5:28:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] How to spell "No PSVI" in XSLT 2.0 ? - 5/13/2002 5:37:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] How to spell "No PSVI" in XSLT 2.0 ? - 5/13/2002 5:38:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] How to spell "No PSVI" in XSLT 2.0 ? - 5/14/2002 2:40:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] How to spell "No PSVI" in XSLT 2.0 ? - 5/14/2002 8:20:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] How to spell "No PSVI" in XSLT 2.0 ? - 5/14/2002 9:47:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] How to spell "No PSVI" in XSLT 2.0 ? - 5/14/2002 10:31:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] How to spell "No PSVI" in XSLT 2.0 without getting sucked into the Processing Model black hole - 5/14/2002 11:18:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] How to spell "No PSVI" in XSLT 2.0 without getting sucked into the Processing Model black hole - 5/14/2002 12:17:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] How to spell "No PSVI" in XSLT 2.0 without getting sucked into the Processing Model black hole - 5/14/2002 12:27:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] How to spell "No PSVI" in XSLT 2.0 without getting sucked into the Processing Model black hole - 5/14/2002 12:41:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] How to spell "No PSVI" in XSLT 2.0 ? - 5/14/2002 1:00:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] How to spell "No PSVI" in XSLT 2.0 ? - 5/14/2002 1:21:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] How to spell "No PSVI" in XSLT 2.0 ? - 5/14/2002 6:35:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] How to spell "No PSVI" in XSLT 2.0 ? - 5/14/2002 9:53:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] How to spell "No PSVI" in XSLT 2.0 ? - 5/14/2002 10:05:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] How to spell "No PSVI" in XSLT 2.0 ? - 5/14/2002 10:39:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] How to spell "No PSVI" in XSLT 2.0 ? - 5/14/2002 10:51:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] How to spell "No PSVI" in XSLT 2.0 ? - 5/13/2002 4:24:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] How to spell "No PSVI" in XSLT 2.0 ? - 5/14/2002 3:25:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] XSLT 2.0 and XSL(-FO) 2.0 - 5/13/2002 10:35:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] XSLT 2.0 and XSL(-FO) 2.0 - 5/13/2002 10:40:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] XSLT 2.0 and XSL(-FO) 2.0 - 5/14/2002 12:32:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] XSLT 2.0 and XSL(-FO) 2.0 - 5/14/2002 2:12:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] XSLT 2.0 and XSL(-FO) 2.0 - 5/14/2002 12:41:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] XSLT 2.0 and XSL(-FO) 2.0 - 5/14/2002 12:46:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] XSLT 2.0 and XSL(-FO) 2.0 - 5/14/2002 12:51:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] XSLT 2.0 and XSL(-FO) 2.0 - 5/14/2002 7:35:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] XSLT 2.0 and XSL(-FO) 2.0 - 5/14/2002 7:55:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] XSLT 2.0 and XSL(-FO) 2.0 - 5/14/2002 8:40:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] XSLT 2.0 and XSL(-FO) 2.0 - 5/14/2002 8:44:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] XSLT 2.0 and XSL(-FO) 2.0 - 5/14/2002 9:22:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] XSLT 2.0 and XSL(-FO) 2.0 - 5/14/2002 10:21:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] XSLT 2.0 and XSL(-FO) 2.0 - 5/14/2002 10:58:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] XSLT 2.0 and XSL(-FO) 2.0 - 5/14/2002 11:11:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] XSLT 2.0 and XSL(-FO) 2.0 - 5/14/2002 1:07:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] XSLT 2.0 and XSL(-FO) 2.0 - 5/14/2002 1:14:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] XSLT 2.0 and XSL(-FO) 2.0 - 5/14/2002 1:21:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] OT: Static/dynamic typing - 5/12/2002 10:09:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] XPath 2.0 - how much of XQuery should it include? - 5/13/2002 1:30:00 AM
Handling of "error value" in XPATH 2.0 - 5/13/2002 4:04:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] Web Services Mapping Capabilities? - 5/13/2002 5:17:00 AM
XML specialized programming/transformation/query languages: can onefit all? - 5/13/2002 7:51:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] frustration (was RE: [xml-dev] XPath 2.0 ) - 5/13/2002 10:36:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] XPath 2.0 - how much of XQuery should it include? - 5/13/2002 10:36:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] PSVI formalization - 5/13/2002 10:42:00 AM
Transforming XML to HTML browser side - 5/13/2002 10:56:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] Transforming XML to HTML browser side - 5/13/2002 12:22:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] frustration (was RE: [xml-dev] XPath 2.0 ) - 5/13/2002 1:03:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] frustration (was RE: [xml-dev] XPath 2.0 ) - 5/13/2002 1:08:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] XPath 2.0 - how much of XQuery should it include? - 5/13/2002 1:11:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] frustration (was RE: [xml-dev] XPath 2.0 ) - 5/13/2002 1:14:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Re: A modest conception of the Semantic Web - 5/13/2002 1:29:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Patent non-proliferation and disarmament - 5/13/2002 1:39:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Transforming XML to HTML browser side - 5/13/2002 1:53:00 PM
XPath 2.0 - What is a "node"? What is an "item"? - 5/13/2002 2:22:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Patent non-proliferation and disarmament - 5/13/2002 2:24:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] How to spell "No PSVI" in XSLT 2.0 ? - 5/13/2002 3:07:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Web Services Mapping Capabilities? - 5/13/2002 3:36:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] organization (was RE: frustration) - 5/13/2002 3:40:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] organization (was RE: frustration) - 5/13/2002 4:02:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] How to spell "No PSVI" in XSLT 2.0 ? - 5/13/2002 4:08:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Patent non-proliferation and disarmament - 5/13/2002 4:42:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Patent non-proliferation and disarmament - 5/13/2002 7:40:00 PM
Re: 64-bit Java - 5/13/2002 8:44:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] XML/XQuery Usage Assumptions (was Re: [xml-dev] XSLT 2.0 / XPath 2.0 - Assumptions) - 5/13/2002 9:08:00 PM
Re: RE: [xml-dev] XSLT 2.0 / XPath 2.0 - Assumptions - 5/13/2002 9:20:00 PM
Re: datatype non-proliferation and disarmament - 5/13/2002 10:43:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Re: datatype non-proliferation and disarmament - 5/13/2002 10:58:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Re: datatype non-proliferation and disarmament - 5/13/2002 11:12:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] XSLT 2.0 and XSL(-FO) 2.0 - 5/14/2002 11:18:00 AM
The Future of XML with and without PSVI - 5/15/2002 7:59:00 AM
Does schema fascism help or hinder interoperability? - 5/15/2002 8:34:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] Fwd: (void) XML sucks - 5/15/2002 9:30:00 AM
Open Standards Organization - 5/15/2002 10:22:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Objections to / uses of PSVI? - 5/15/2002 11:02:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Objections to / uses of PSVI? - 5/15/2002 11:05:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Objections to / uses of PSVI? - 5/15/2002 11:08:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Objections to / uses of PSVI? - 5/15/2002 11:12:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] How to spell "No PSVI" in XSLT 2.0 without getting sucked into the Processing Model black hole - 5/15/2002 11:13:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Objections to / uses of PSVI? - 5/15/2002 12:07:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Objections to / uses of PSVI? - 5/15/2002 12:37:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Objections to / uses of PSVI? - 5/15/2002 12:37:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Objections to / uses of PSVI? - 5/15/2002 12:39:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Objections to / uses of PSVI? - 5/15/2002 1:15:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Objections to / uses of PSVI? - 5/15/2002 1:17:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Objections to / uses of PSVI? - 5/15/2002 1:30:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Objections to / uses of PSVI? - 5/15/2002 1:49:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Objections to / uses of PSVI? - 5/15/2002 1:51:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Objections to / uses of PSVI? - 5/15/2002 2:16:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Objections to / uses of PSVI? - 5/15/2002 2:27:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Open Standards Organization - 5/15/2002 2:42:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] news for the paranoid - 5/15/2002 3:48:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Open Standards Organization - 5/15/2002 5:09:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Open Standards Organization - 5/15/2002 5:47:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Open Standards Organization - 5/15/2002 5:52:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Open Standards Organization - 5/15/2002 5:59:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Objections to / uses of PSVI? - 5/15/2002 8:22:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Objections to / uses of PSVI? - 5/15/2002 8:56:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] frustration (was RE: [xml-dev] XPath 2.0 ) - 5/15/2002 11:08:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Open Standards Organization - 5/16/2002 2:21:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] Open Standards Organization - 5/16/2002 2:47:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Objections to / uses of PSVI? - 5/16/2002 4:07:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Objections to / uses of PSVI? - 5/16/2002 4:20:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Objections to / uses of PSVI? - 5/16/2002 5:01:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Objections to / uses of PSVI? - 5/16/2002 9:24:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Objections to / uses of PSVI? - 5/16/2002 9:27:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] Open Standards Organization - 5/16/2002 9:51:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] Objections to / uses of PSVI? - 5/16/2002 10:09:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Objections to / uses of PSVI? - 5/16/2002 10:09:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Objections to / uses of PSVI? - 5/16/2002 10:14:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Objections to / uses of PSVI? - 5/16/2002 10:31:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] Open Standards Organization - 5/16/2002 10:34:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Objections to / uses of PSVI? - 5/16/2002 10:42:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Objections to / uses of PSVI? - 5/16/2002 11:03:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Rationale Behind The PSVI - 5/16/2002 11:20:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Objections to / uses of PSVI? - 5/16/2002 12:05:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Rationale Behind The PSVI - 5/16/2002 12:21:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Objections to / uses of PSVI? - 5/16/2002 12:35:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Objections to / uses of PSVI? - 5/16/2002 12:55:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] frustration (was RE: [xml-dev] XPath 2.0 ) - 5/16/2002 1:14:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Open Standards Organization - 5/16/2002 1:20:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Open Standards Organization - 5/16/2002 1:21:00 PM
Why would I need a PSVI? - 5/16/2002 1:41:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Objections to / uses of PSVI? - 5/16/2002 1:48:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Objections to / uses of PSVI? - 5/16/2002 1:56:00 PM
OASIS announcement of LegalXML discussion lists - 5/16/2002 1:56:00 PM
[ANN] IPSI-XQ 1.0.1 - The XQuery Demonstrator - 5/16/2002 2:18:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Patent non-proliferation and disarmament - 5/16/2002 2:33:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Rationale Behind The PSVI - 5/16/2002 2:48:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Patent non-proliferation and disarmament - 5/16/2002 3:10:00 PM
Penance for misspent attributes - 5/16/2002 3:25:00 PM
xml parsers compliance and performance tests available. - 5/16/2002 3:44:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Objections to / uses of PSVI? - 5/16/2002 4:19:00 PM
OASIS announcement of Management Services discussion lists - 5/16/2002 6:17:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Penance for misspent attributes - 5/16/2002 7:12:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Objections to / uses of PSVI? - 5/16/2002 11:13:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Two quick questions regarding restriction in XML Schema - 5/16/2002 11:15:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Objections to / uses of PSVI? - 5/16/2002 11:31:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Objections to / uses of PSVI? - 5/17/2002 12:41:00 AM
XER resources - 5/17/2002 1:41:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Objections to / uses of PSVI? - 5/17/2002 5:37:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Penance for misspent attributes - 5/17/2002 8:06:00 AM
Need to create a IDE with xml interfaces. - 5/17/2002 8:37:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] Penance for misspent attributes - 5/17/2002 8:47:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] How to spell "No PSVI" in XSLT 2.0 ? - 5/17/2002 1:25:00 PM
Re: RE: [xml-dev] How to spell "No PSVI" in XSLT 2.0 ? - 5/17/2002 1:53:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] How to spell "No PSVI" in XSLT 2.0 ? - 5/18/2002 7:57:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] How to spell "No PSVI" in XSLT 2.0 ? - 5/18/2002 8:54:00 PM
Processing DTDs - 5/19/2002 4:10:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Processing DTDs - 5/19/2002 4:11:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Processing DTDs - 5/19/2002 6:31:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Penance for misspent attributes - 5/17/2002 1:29:00 PM
RE: RE: [xml-dev] How to spell "No PSVI" in XSLT 2.0 ? - 5/17/2002 2:31:00 PM
a standards story - 5/17/2002 2:44:00 PM
RE: RE: RE: [xml-dev] How to spell "No PSVI" in XSLT 2.0 ? - 5/17/2002 3:13:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] How to spell "No PSVI" in XSLT 2.0 ? - 5/17/2002 4:07:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] How to spell "No PSVI" in XSLT 2.0 ? - 5/17/2002 4:50:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] How to spell "No PSVI" in XSLT 2.0 ? - 5/20/2002 5:19:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] How to spell "No PSVI" in XSLT 2.0 ? - 5/21/2002 7:12:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] How to spell "No PSVI" in XSLT 2.0 ? - 5/21/2002 1:17:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] How to spell "No PSVI" in XSLT 2.0 ? - 5/21/2002 4:34:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] How to spell "No PSVI" in XSLT 2.0 ? - 5/21/2002 4:38:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] How to spell "No PSVI" in XSLT 2.0 ? - 5/21/2002 5:52:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] How to spell "No PSVI" in XSLT 2.0 ? - 5/21/2002 8:01:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] How to spell "No PSVI" in XSLT 2.0 ? - 5/21/2002 9:33:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] How to spell "No PSVI" in XSLT 2.0 ? - 5/21/2002 11:29:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] How to spell "No PSVI" in XSLT 2.0 ? - 5/21/2002 8:29:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] How to spell "No PSVI" in XSLT 2.0 ? - 5/22/2002 3:52:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] How to spell "No PSVI" in XSLT 2.0 ? - 5/19/2002 2:03:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Penance for misspent attributes - 5/17/2002 4:05:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] a standards story - 5/17/2002 4:09:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] How to spell "No PSVI" in XSLT 2.0 ? - 5/17/2002 5:10:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] a standards story - 5/17/2002 5:20:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] a standards story - 5/17/2002 5:35:00 PM
XML Data Integration Platform - 5/18/2002 8:20:00 AM
Question regarding extension.. - 5/18/2002 4:22:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Penance for misspent attributes - 5/18/2002 4:23:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Two quick questions regarding restriction in XML Schema - 5/19/2002 8:35:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] XML Database vs. OO Database - 5/19/2002 4:04:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] How to spell "No PSVI" in XSLT 2.0 ? - 5/20/2002 1:27:00 PM
Intelligent Adaptive Systems (WAS RE: [xml-dev] Objections to / uses of PSVI?) - 5/20/2002 1:36:00 PM
ANN: REST Tutorial - 5/20/2002 4:53:00 PM
[ANN] Ipedo Web Express 3.0 - 5/20/2002 4:56:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] ANN: REST Tutorial - 5/20/2002 4:57:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] How to spell "No PSVI" in XSLT 2.0 ? - 5/20/2002 5:38:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] ANN: REST Tutorial - 5/20/2002 7:03:00 PM
SAX and Pull options: was: Penance for misspent attributes - 5/21/2002 1:51:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] How to spell "No PSVI" in XSLT 2.0 ? - 5/21/2002 4:54:00 AM
XML Editor - 5/21/2002 7:36:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] ANN: REST Tutorial - 5/21/2002 8:10:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] How to spell "No PSVI" in XSLT 2.0 ? - 5/21/2002 1:00:00 PM
ANN: Hypertext conference, includes XML and web-related tutorials - 5/21/2002 1:45:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] ANN: REST Tutorial - 5/21/2002 2:22:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] ANN: REST Tutorial - 5/21/2002 3:33:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] ANN: REST Tutorial - 5/21/2002 3:47:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Painful USA Today article (was RE: [xml-dev] ANN: REST Tutorial) - 5/21/2002 4:04:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Painful USA Today article (was RE: [xml-dev] ANN: RESTTutorial) - 5/21/2002 7:28:00 PM
TR9503 to XSD - 5/21/2002 8:35:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Painful USA Today article (was RE: [xml-dev] ANN: RESTTutorial) - 5/21/2002 8:43:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Painful USA Today article (was RE: [xml-dev] ANN: RESTTutorial) - 5/21/2002 10:02:00 PM
RE: RE: [xml-dev] Painful USA Today article (was RE: [xml-dev] ANN: RESTTutorial) - 5/21/2002 10:08:00 PM
Sorry for the trouble - 5/22/2002 4:20:00 AM
Check mail - 5/22/2002 9:17:00 AM
RE: RE: [xml-dev] Painful USA Today article (was RE: [xml-dev] AN N: RESTTutorial) - 5/22/2002 1:12:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Painful USA Today article (was RE: [xml-dev] ANN: RESTTutorial) - 5/22/2002 1:28:00 PM
RE: RE: [xml-dev] Painful USA Today article (was RE: [xml-dev] ANN: R ESTTutorial) - 5/22/2002 2:56:00 PM
RE: RE: [xml-dev] Painful USA Today article (was RE: [xml-dev] AN N: RESTTutorial) - 5/22/2002 3:03:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] ANN: REST Tutorial - 5/22/2002 3:15:00 PM
RE: RE: [xml-dev] Painful USA Today article (was RE: [xml-dev] AN N: RESTTutorial) - 5/22/2002 3:20:00 PM
RE: RE: [xml-dev] Painful USA Today article (was RE: [xml-dev] AN N: RESTTutorial) - 5/22/2002 3:38:00 PM
W3C style bodies aren't working anymore - Discuss - 5/22/2002 4:49:00 PM
BLOAT, April Fool's joke, but.. - 5/22/2002 5:02:00 PM
RE: RE: [xml-dev] Painful USA Today article (was RE: [xml-dev] AN N: RESTTutorial) - 5/22/2002 5:33:00 PM
RE: RE: [xml-dev] Painful USA Today article (was RE: [xml-dev] AN N: RESTTutorial) - 5/22/2002 5:34:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Painful USA Today article (was RE: [xml-dev] ANN: RESTTutorial) - 5/22/2002 5:38:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] W3C style bodies aren't working anymore - Discuss - 5/22/2002 5:42:00 PM
RE: RE: [xml-dev] Painful USA Today article (was RE: [xml-dev] AN N: RESTTutorial) - 5/22/2002 5:58:00 PM
RE: RE: [xml-dev] Painful USA Today article (was RE: [xml-dev] AN N: RESTTutorial) - 5/22/2002 6:08:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Painful USA Today article (was RE: [xml-dev] ANN: R ESTTutorial) - 5/22/2002 6:09:00 PM
RE: RE: [xml-dev] Painful USA Today article (was RE: [xml-dev] AN N: RESTTutorial) - 5/22/2002 6:10:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Two quick questions regarding restriction in XML Schema - 5/22/2002 6:11:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Two quick questions regarding restriction in XML Schema - 5/22/2002 6:20:00 PM
RE: RE: [xml-dev] Painful USA Today article (was RE: [xml-dev] AN N: RESTTutorial) - 5/22/2002 6:23:00 PM
RE: RE: [xml-dev] Painful USA Today article (was RE: [xml-dev] AN N: RESTTutorial) - 5/22/2002 6:37:00 PM
RE: RE: [xml-dev] Painful USA Today article (was RE: [xml-dev] AN N: R ESTTutorial) - 5/22/2002 6:46:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Two quick questions regarding restriction in XML Schema - 5/22/2002 7:09:00 PM
Long thought to be moribund (Was Painful USA Today article) - 5/22/2002 8:11:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Two quick questions regarding restriction in XML Schema - 5/22/2002 11:45:00 PM
DTDs, W3C Schemas, RELAX NG, Schematron? - 5/23/2002 1:35:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] Painful USA Today article (was RE: [xml-dev] ANN: RESTTutorial) - 5/23/2002 7:45:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] Painful USA Today article (was RE: [xml-dev] ANN: R ESTTutorial) - 5/23/2002 11:57:00 AM
RELAX NG is now a draft international standard - 5/23/2002 1:25:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] DTDs, W3C Schemas, RELAX NG, Schematron? - 5/23/2002 1:31:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Painful USA Today article (was RE: [xml-dev] ANN: RESTTutorial) - 5/23/2002 1:50:00 PM
We're interested in your experiences with XML... - 5/23/2002 1:56:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Painful USA Today article (was RE: [xml-dev] ANN: RESTTutorial) - 5/23/2002 2:05:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Painful USA Today article (was RE: [xml-dev] ANN: R ESTTutorial) - 5/23/2002 2:24:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Painful USA Today article (was RE: [xml-dev] ANN: RESTTutorial) - 5/23/2002 2:36:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Painful USA Today article (was RE: [xml-dev] ANN: R ESTTutorial) - 5/23/2002 3:17:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] DTDs, W3C Schemas, RELAX NG, Schematron? - 5/23/2002 3:42:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Painful USA Today article (was RE: [xml-dev] ANN: R ESTTutorial) - 5/23/2002 3:59:00 PM
parser to use - 5/23/2002 4:08:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] DTDs, W3C Schemas, RELAX NG, Schematron? - 5/23/2002 4:25:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] DTDs, W3C Schemas, RELAX NG, Schematron? - 5/23/2002 4:32:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] parser to use - 5/23/2002 4:35:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] DTDs, W3C Schemas, RELAX NG, Schematron? - 5/23/2002 4:35:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Painful USA Today article (was RE: [xml-dev] ANN: RESTTutorial) - 5/23/2002 4:40:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] DTDs, W3C Schemas, RELAX NG, Schematron? - 5/23/2002 4:58:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] DTDs, W3C Schemas, RELAX NG, Schematron? - 5/23/2002 5:02:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] DTDs, W3C Schemas, RELAX NG, Schematron? - 5/23/2002 5:02:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] DTDs, W3C Schemas, RELAX NG, Schematron? - 5/23/2002 6:35:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] DTDs, W3C Schemas, RELAX NG, Schematron? - 5/23/2002 7:01:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] DTDs, W3C Schemas, RELAX NG, Schematron? - 5/23/2002 11:43:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] DTDs, W3C Schemas, RELAX NG, Schematron? - 5/24/2002 3:51:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] DTDs, W3C Schemas, RELAX NG, Schematron? - 5/24/2002 4:26:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] DTDs, W3C Schemas, RELAX NG, Schematron? - 5/24/2002 2:31:00 PM
The sky is falling! XML's dirty secret! Go back! It's a trap! - 5/30/2002 3:46:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] The sky is falling! XML's dirty secret! Go back! It's a trap! - 5/30/2002 4:55:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] The sky is falling! XML's dirty secret! Go back! It's a trap! - 5/30/2002 5:11:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] The sky is falling! XML's dirty secret! Go back! It's a trap! - 5/30/2002 8:43:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] The sky is falling! XML's dirty secret! Go back! It's a trap! - 5/30/2002 5:16:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] The sky is falling! XML's dirty secret! Go back! It's a trap! - 5/30/2002 8:33:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] The sky is falling! XML's dirty secret! Go back! It'sa trap! - 5/30/2002 10:06:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] The sky is falling! XML's dirty secret! Go back! It's a trap! - 5/31/2002 9:18:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] The sky is falling! XML's dirty secret! Go back! It's a trap! - 5/30/2002 9:03:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] The sky is falling! XML's dirty secret! Go back! It's a trap! - 5/30/2002 9:09:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] The sky is falling! XML's dirty secret! Go back! It's a trap! - 5/31/2002 6:51:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] The sky is falling! XML's dirty secret! Go back! It's a trap! - 5/31/2002 9:12:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] The sky is falling! XML's dirty secret! Go back! It's a trap! - 5/30/2002 9:12:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] The sky is falling! XML's dirty secret! Go back! It's a trap! - 5/31/2002 12:51:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] The sky is falling! XML's dirty secret! Go back! It's a trap! - 5/30/2002 10:29:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] DTDs, W3C Schemas, RELAX NG, Schematron? - 5/24/2002 7:53:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] Two quick questions regarding restriction in XML Schema - 5/23/2002 5:21:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Painful USA Today article (was RE: [xml-dev] ANN: RESTTutorial) - 5/23/2002 6:32:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] DTDs, W3C Schemas, RELAX NG, Schematron? - 5/23/2002 6:57:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] The XML Infoset, Character Data and Attribute Types - 5/23/2002 7:16:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Painful USA Today article (was RE: [xml-dev] ANN: RESTTutorial) - 5/23/2002 7:17:00 PM
xsl escaping - 5/23/2002 7:20:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Painful USA Today article (was RE: [xml-dev] ANN: RESTTutorial) - 5/23/2002 7:29:00 PM
Turn Off Automatic Script Activation In Outlook (WAS RE: [xml-dev] Painful USA Today article (was RE: [xml-dev] ANN: R ESTTutorial)) - 5/23/2002 7:42:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Painful USA Today article (was RE: [xml-dev] ANN: RESTTutorial) - 5/23/2002 9:20:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Painful USA Today article (was RE: [xml-dev] ANN: RESTTutorial) - 5/23/2002 9:28:00 PM
XPath,XPointer and XLink - 5/24/2002 3:53:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] DTDs, W3C Schemas, RELAX NG, Schematron? - 5/24/2002 7:24:00 AM
ANN: XML-DBMS version 2.0, alpha 3 - 5/24/2002 8:39:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] Turn Off Automatic Script Activation In Outlook (WAS RE: [xml-dev ] Painful USA Today article (was RE: [xml-dev] ANN: R ESTTutorial)) - 5/24/2002 1:52:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Painful USA Today article (was RE: [xml-dev] ANN: RESTTutorial) - 5/24/2002 2:01:00 PM
[OT] legal issues in archiving documents - 5/24/2002 2:09:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Turn Off Automatic Script Activation In Outlook (WA S RE: [xml-dev ] Painful USA Today article (was RE: [xml-dev] ANN: R ESTT utorial)) - 5/24/2002 2:39:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] balance (RE: [xml-dev] Turn Off Automatic Script Activation In Outlook) - 5/24/2002 2:48:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] balance (RE: [xml-dev] Turn Off Automatic Script Ac tivation In Outlook) - 5/24/2002 3:15:00 PM
ANN: Oracle XQuery Prototype & Production SQLX+XMLType Support - 5/24/2002 4:53:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Painful USA Today article (was RE: [xml-dev] ANN: RESTTutorial) - 5/24/2002 7:24:00 PM
Updated Schema Reference cards. - 5/25/2002 3:37:00 AM
hello - 5/25/2002 12:21:00 PM
The report on subtyping.. - 5/25/2002 3:46:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Painful USA Today article (was RE: [xml-dev] ANN:RESTTutorial) - 5/25/2002 6:36:00 PM
XML Architecture - 5/25/2002 6:40:00 PM
Try RELAX NG without installing any software - 5/26/2002 4:46:00 PM
After XML Europe 2002 - 5/27/2002 1:02:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] balance - 5/28/2002 1:28:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Painful USA Today article (was RE: [xml-dev] ANN:RESTTutorial) - 5/28/2002 1:46:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] XML Editor - 5/28/2002 2:54:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] balance - 5/28/2002 5:26:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] DTDs, W3C Schemas, RELAX NG, Schematron? - 5/28/2002 6:54:00 PM
Intrinsic Properties of XML Nodes - 5/28/2002 9:29:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Question regarding PSVI.. - 5/29/2002 12:03:00 AM
Different Validation in XML Spy 4.2, 4.3 and 4.4 - 5/29/2002 3:24:00 AM
XML Question - 5/29/2002 10:46:00 AM
parsing a DTD without having the entities resolved. - 5/29/2002 10:57:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] XML Question - 5/29/2002 12:19:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] XML Question - 5/29/2002 1:08:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] XML Question - 5/29/2002 2:57:00 PM
XML Schema : not empty simple type - 5/29/2002 3:35:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] XML Schema : not empty simple type - 5/29/2002 4:21:00 PM
SAX survey: expected local name for non-namespace qualifiedelements - 5/29/2002 4:48:00 PM
ASN.1 - 5/29/2002 5:41:00 PM
The Core WG on xml:orphanedChar - 5/29/2002 9:00:00 PM
ANN: Ratchet 0.1 - An XML Schema Compiler for C++ - 5/29/2002 11:37:00 PM
Native xml db for small enterprise with evolving schema - 5/30/2002 12:16:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] XML Schema : not empty simple type - 5/30/2002 12:34:00 AM
[announce] ALTOVA Inc., Announces DocBook Support and Web Services Interoperability Enhancements in XML Spy 4.4 Suite - 5/30/2002 12:53:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] Question regarding PSVI.. - 5/30/2002 1:32:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] SAX survey: expected local name for non-namespace qualifiedelements - 5/30/2002 6:16:00 AM
xml messaging architecture and SOAP - 5/30/2002 6:31:00 AM
Question: Plugins in XML? - 5/30/2002 6:35:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] SAX survey: expected local name for non-namespace qualified elements - 5/30/2002 10:29:00 AM
Web Services Review - 5/30/2002 12:52:00 PM
Re: SAX survey: expected local name for non-namespace qualified elements - 5/30/2002 1:54:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Web Services Review - 5/30/2002 2:10:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Different Validation in XML Spy 4.2, 4.3 and 4.4 - 5/30/2002 3:08:00 PM
XML IDE: What are the top 3 and why? - 5/30/2002 4:27:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Web Services Review - 5/30/2002 4:55:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] The sky is falling! XML's dirty secret! Go back! It's a trap! - 5/30/2002 7:58:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] The sky is falling! XML's dirty secret! Go back! It's a trap! - 5/30/2002 8:48:00 PM
XML Schema: Getting lookup tables from DB - 5/30/2002 9:01:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] The sky is falling! XML's dirty secret! Go back! It's a trap! - 5/30/2002 10:16:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Question regarding PSVI.. - 5/30/2002 11:45:00 PM
Question: Plugins in XML?!!! - 5/31/2002 3:29:00 AM
RE: RE: [xml-dev] The sky is falling! XML's dirty secret! Go back!It's a trap! - 5/31/2002 3:46:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] XML Schema: Getting lookup tables from DB - 5/31/2002 1:35:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] The sky is falling! XML's dirty secret! Go back! It's a trap! - 5/31/2002 1:46:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Re: SAX survey: expected local name for non-namespace qualified elements - 5/31/2002 3:03:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] The sky is falling! XML's dirty secret! Go back! It's a trap! - 5/31/2002 3:27:00 PM
ANN: Ool - Out-of-line Markup Tools - 5/31/2002 6:31:00 PM
Visualizing data - www.kartoo.com - 5/31/2002 7:10:00 PM


transparent
Print
Mail
Like It
Disclaimer
.

These Archives are provided for informational purposes only and have been generated directly from the Altova mailing list archive system and are comprised of the lists set forth on www.altova.com/list/index.html. Therefore, Altova does not warrant or guarantee the accuracy, reliability, completeness, usefulness, non-infringement of intellectual property rights, or quality of any content on the Altova Mailing List Archive(s), regardless of who originates that content. You expressly understand and agree that you bear all risks associated with using or relying on that content. Altova will not be liable or responsible in any way for any content posted including, but not limited to, any errors or omissions in content, or for any losses or damage of any kind incurred as a result of the use of or reliance on any content. This disclaimer and limitation on liability is in addition to the disclaimers and limitations contained in the Website Terms of Use and elsewhere on the site.

.
.

transparent

transparent