Altova Mailing List Archives

xml-dev



RE: [xml-dev] Co-operating with Architectural Forms - 2/1/2002 12:04:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] Co-operating with Architectural Forms - 2/1/2002 8:04:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Co-operating with Architectural Forms - 2/1/2002 12:18:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] Namespaces in XML and schemas - 2/1/2002 12:45:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Co-operating with Architectural Forms - 2/1/2002 1:11:00 AM
bioinformatics, XML - 2/1/2002 1:51:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] bioinformatics, XML - 2/1/2002 12:04:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Co-operating with Architectural Forms - 2/1/2002 2:05:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Co-operating with Architectural Forms - 2/1/2002 2:59:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Co-operating with Architectural Forms - 2/1/2002 3:07:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Co-operating with Architectural Forms - 2/1/2002 3:12:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Co-operating with Architectural Forms - 2/1/2002 5:08:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] bioinformatics, XML - 2/1/2002 7:02:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] Co-operating with Architectural Forms - 2/1/2002 7:53:00 AM
Usage of Escape Character instead of CDATA - 2/1/2002 10:46:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Usage of Escape Character instead of CDATA - 2/1/2002 10:52:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] life support for DTDs? was RE: [xml-dev] misprocessing namespaces) - 2/1/2002 10:54:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Co-operating with Architectural Forms - 2/1/2002 11:00:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] life support for DTDs? was RE: [xml-dev] misprocessing namespaces) - 2/1/2002 11:23:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Namespaces in XML and schemas - 2/1/2002 11:31:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] life support for DTDs? was RE: [xml-dev] misprocessing namespaces) - 2/1/2002 11:37:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Co-operating with Architectural Forms - 2/1/2002 11:48:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Co-operating with Architectural Forms - 2/1/2002 12:06:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Co-operating with Architectural Forms - 2/1/2002 12:08:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Co-operating with Architectural Forms - 2/1/2002 2:43:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Co-operating with Architectural Forms - 2/1/2002 12:36:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] life support for DTDs? was RE: [xml-dev] misprocessing namespaces) - 2/1/2002 1:03:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Co-operating with Architectural Forms - 2/1/2002 1:18:00 PM
cooperating with XML was Re: [xml-dev] Co-operating with Architectural Forms - 2/1/2002 1:27:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Co-operating with Architectural Forms - 2/1/2002 1:38:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Namespaces in XML and schemas - 2/1/2002 1:49:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] life support for DTDs? was RE: [xml-dev] misprocessing namespaces) - 2/1/2002 2:06:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] life support for DTDs? was RE: [xml-dev] misprocessing namespaces) - 2/1/2002 2:08:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] life support for DTDs? was RE: [xml-dev] misprocessing namespaces) - 2/1/2002 2:20:00 PM
what 'isa' piece of xml? was Re: [xml-dev] Co-operating with Architectural Forms - 2/1/2002 2:38:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] cooperating with XML was Re: [xml-dev] Co-operating with Architectural Forms - 2/1/2002 2:44:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] life support for DTDs? was RE: [xml-dev] misprocessing namespaces) - 2/1/2002 3:00:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] life support for DTDs? was RE: [xml-dev] misprocessing namespaces) - 2/2/2002 4:25:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] Co-operating with Architectural Forms - 2/1/2002 3:01:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Co-operating with Architectural Forms - 2/1/2002 3:08:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Co-operating with Architectural Forms - 2/1/2002 3:30:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Co-operating with Architectural Forms - 2/1/2002 4:02:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Co-operating with Architectural Forms - 2/1/2002 3:32:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Co-operating with Architectural Forms - 2/1/2002 4:46:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Co-operating with Architectural Forms - 2/1/2002 3:32:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Co-operating with Architectural Forms - 2/1/2002 3:34:00 PM
XML-1.0 is dead! long live XML-1.0+Namespaced-DTD! [was Re: [xml-dev] life support for DTDs? - 2/1/2002 3:41:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Co-operating with Architectural Forms - 2/1/2002 4:17:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Co-operating with Architectural Forms - 2/1/2002 5:12:00 PM
Re: RE: [xml-dev] Co-operating with Architectural Forms - 2/1/2002 5:16:00 PM
Re: cooperating with XML was Re: [xml-dev] Co-operating with Architectural Forms - 2/1/2002 4:39:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] life support for DTDs? was RE: [xml-dev] misprocessing namespaces) - 2/1/2002 4:41:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] life support for DTDs? was RE: [xml-dev] misprocessingnamespaces) - 2/1/2002 5:25:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Co-operating with Architectural Forms - 2/1/2002 5:02:00 PM
XPointer crisis - 2/1/2002 5:11:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] XPointer crisis - 2/1/2002 5:21:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] XPointer crisis - 2/1/2002 7:21:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] XPointer crisis - 2/1/2002 7:40:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] XPointer crisis - 2/1/2002 7:52:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] XPointer crisis - 2/1/2002 8:24:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] XPointer crisis - 2/1/2002 8:27:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] XPointer crisis - 2/1/2002 8:32:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] XPointer crisis - 2/1/2002 8:32:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] XPointer crisis - 2/2/2002 11:08:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] XPointer crisis - 2/2/2002 12:18:00 PM
Press Releases - 2/1/2002 5:25:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] XPointer crisis - 2/1/2002 5:33:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] XPointer crisis - 2/1/2002 5:38:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] XPointer crisis - 2/1/2002 5:52:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] XPointer crisis - 2/1/2002 5:53:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] XPointer crisis - 2/1/2002 6:00:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] XPointer crisis - 2/1/2002 6:06:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] XPointer crisis - 2/1/2002 6:17:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] XPointer crisis - 2/1/2002 6:22:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] XPointer crisis - 2/1/2002 6:38:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] XPointer crisis - 2/1/2002 7:20:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] XPointer crisis - 2/1/2002 7:41:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] XPointer crisis - 2/1/2002 8:00:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] XPointer crisis - 2/1/2002 8:33:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] XPointer crisis - 2/2/2002 5:09:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] XPointer crisis - 2/2/2002 6:11:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] Co-operating with Architectural Forms - 2/1/2002 5:20:00 PM
RE: RE: [xml-dev] Co-operating with Architectural Forms - 2/1/2002 5:23:00 PM
What am I overlooking...? - 2/1/2002 5:24:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] What am I overlooking...? - 2/2/2002 10:05:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] What am I overlooking...? - 2/2/2002 3:56:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] What am I overlooking...? - 2/3/2002 11:16:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Press Releases - 2/1/2002 6:56:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Press Releases - 2/2/2002 2:33:00 AM
What is fast ? - 2/1/2002 7:25:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Co-operating with Architectural Forms - 2/1/2002 7:52:00 PM
XML Catalog Resolvers 1.1 Released - 2/1/2002 7:58:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Co-operating with Architectural Forms - 2/1/2002 8:09:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Co-operating with Architectural Forms - 2/1/2002 8:19:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Co-operating with Architectural Forms - 2/2/2002 12:30:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Co-operating with Architectural Forms - 2/2/2002 3:23:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] What is fast ? - 2/1/2002 8:44:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] What is fast ? - 2/1/2002 8:55:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Co-operating with Architectural Forms - 2/1/2002 9:04:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] XPointer crisis - 2/1/2002 9:47:00 PM
Architectural Forms: A New Generation (draft 2) - 2/1/2002 10:56:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] XML Catalog Resolvers 1.1 Released - 2/1/2002 10:59:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] XPointer crisis - 2/1/2002 11:07:00 PM
Converting ASCII text to XML - 2/1/2002 11:08:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] XPointer crisis - 2/1/2002 11:32:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] XPointer crisis - 2/4/2002 1:37:00 PM
RELAX NG - 2/2/2002 8:14:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] RELAX NG - 2/2/2002 3:44:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Co-operating with Architectural Forms - 2/2/2002 8:58:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] Co-operating with Architectural Forms - 2/2/2002 2:57:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Co-operating with Architectural Forms - 2/2/2002 9:04:00 AM
"Smart ASCII" -> XML for authoring? - 2/2/2002 6:23:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] "Smart ASCII" -> XML for authoring? - 2/2/2002 7:37:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] "Smart ASCII" -> XML for authoring? - 2/2/2002 8:00:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] "Smart ASCII" -> XML for authoring? - 2/2/2002 8:20:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] "Smart ASCII" -> XML for authoring? - 2/3/2002 2:30:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] "Smart ASCII" -> XML for authoring? - 2/3/2002 4:10:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] "Smart ASCII" -> XML for authoring? - 2/3/2002 9:56:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] "Smart ASCII" -> XML for authoring? - 2/3/2002 10:23:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] "Smart ASCII" -> XML for authoring? - 2/4/2002 3:00:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] "Smart ASCII" -> XML for authoring? - 2/4/2002 1:31:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] "Smart ASCII" -> XML for authoring? - 2/4/2002 1:57:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] "Smart ASCII" -> XML for authoring? - 2/4/2002 2:21:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] "Smart ASCII" -> XML for authoring? - 2/4/2002 11:53:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] "Smart ASCII" -> XML for authoring? - 2/5/2002 6:46:00 AM
Architectural Forms: A New Generation (draft 2.1) - 2/2/2002 11:41:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Architectural Forms: A New Generation (draft 2.1) - 2/3/2002 4:00:00 PM
looking for XML vendor in Santa Clara - 2/3/2002 2:59:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] Co-operating with Architectural Forms - 2/3/2002 5:01:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] misprocessing namespaces (was Re: [xml-dev] Thereis a meaning, but it's not in the data alone) - 2/3/2002 5:25:00 AM
Garbage collection in DOM - 2/3/2002 8:53:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Co-operating with Architectural Forms - 2/3/2002 9:54:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Co-operating with Architectural Forms - 2/3/2002 9:57:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] life support for DTDs? was RE: [xml-dev] misprocessing namespaces) - 2/4/2002 1:09:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] misprocessing namespaces (was Re: [xml-dev] There is a meaning, but it's not in the data alone) - 2/4/2002 5:01:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] misprocessing namespaces (was Re: [xml-dev] There is a meaning, but it's not in the data alone) - 2/4/2002 8:47:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] misprocessing namespaces (was Re: [xml-dev] There is a meaning, but it's not in the data alone) - 2/4/2002 10:01:00 PM
Getting rid of entities (was: misprocessing namespaces) - 2/4/2002 10:36:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] misprocessing namespaces (was Re: [xml-dev] There is a meaning, but it's not in the data alone) - 2/5/2002 1:56:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] misprocessing namespaces (was Re: [xml-dev] There is a meaning, but it's not in the data alone) - 2/5/2002 2:12:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] misprocessing namespaces (was Re: [xml-dev] There is a meaning, but it's not in the data alone) - 2/5/2002 2:34:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Getting rid of entities (was: misprocessing namespaces) - 2/5/2002 10:15:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Getting rid of entities (was: misprocessing namespaces) - 2/5/2002 11:14:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Getting rid of entities (was: misprocessing namespaces) - 2/5/2002 11:30:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Getting rid of entities (was: misprocessing namespaces) - 2/5/2002 11:37:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Getting rid of entities (was: misprocessing namespaces) - 2/5/2002 11:54:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] Getting rid of entities (was: misprocessing namespaces) - 2/5/2002 12:15:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Getting rid of entities (was: misprocessing namespaces) - 2/5/2002 12:57:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Getting rid of entities (was: misprocessing namespaces) - 2/5/2002 12:22:00 PM
A heavier-weight proposal for character entity definition - 2/5/2002 12:59:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] A heavier-weight proposal for character entitydefinition - 2/5/2002 2:56:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Getting rid of entities (was: misprocessingnamespaces) - 2/5/2002 3:13:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] A heavier-weight proposal for character entity definition - 2/5/2002 3:39:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Getting rid of entities (was: misprocessing namespaces) - 2/6/2002 4:03:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] misprocessing namespaces (was Re: [xml-dev] There is a meaning, but it's not in the data alone) - 2/4/2002 8:03:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] misprocessing namespaces (was Re: [xml-dev] There is a meaning, but it's not in the data alone) - 2/4/2002 9:56:00 AM
SAF anyone? - 2/4/2002 10:03:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] SAF anyone? - 2/4/2002 4:17:00 PM
Solving current schema problems with DSDs - 2/4/2002 12:23:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Solving current schema problems with DSDs - 2/4/2002 1:21:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] What am I overlooking...? - 2/4/2002 2:46:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] What am I overlooking...? (namespaces, validation, & xsv) - 2/4/2002 2:46:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] What am I overlooking...? - 2/4/2002 2:47:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Co-operating with Architectural Forms - 2/4/2002 2:50:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] misprocessing namespaces (was Re: [xml-dev] There is a meaning, but it's not in the data alone) - 2/4/2002 3:42:00 PM
Register for Open Publish 2002 today! - 2/4/2002 4:52:00 PM
Categories of Web Service messages: data-oriented vs action-oriented - 2/4/2002 7:57:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Categories of Web Service messages: data-orientedvs action-oriented - 2/4/2002 8:20:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Categories of Web Service messages: data-oriented vs action-oriented - 2/4/2002 8:29:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Categories of Web Service messages: data-oriented vsaction-oriented - 2/4/2002 8:54:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Categories of Web Service messages: data-oriented vs action-oriented - 2/4/2002 10:17:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Categories of Web Service messages: data-oriented vs action-oriented - 2/4/2002 11:54:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Categories of Web Service messages: data-oriented vs action-oriented - 2/5/2002 12:12:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] misprocessing namespaces (was Re: [xml-dev] There is a meaning, but it's not in the data alone) - 2/4/2002 8:31:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] SAF anyone? - 2/4/2002 8:40:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] SAF anyone? - 2/4/2002 9:33:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] SAF anyone? - 2/5/2002 1:50:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] XPointer crisis - 2/4/2002 8:53:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Categories of Web Service messages: data-oriented vs action-oriented - 2/4/2002 9:02:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Categories of Web Service messages: data-oriented v s action-oriented - 2/4/2002 9:12:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Categories of Web Service messages: data-oriented v s action-oriented - 2/4/2002 9:32:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] What am I overlooking...? (namespaces, validation, & xsv) - 2/4/2002 9:36:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Categories of Web Service messages: data-oriented vs action-oriented - 2/4/2002 9:51:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Categories of Web Service messages: data-oriented v s action-oriented - 2/4/2002 9:51:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Categories of Web Service messages: data-oriented vs action-oriented - 2/4/2002 10:17:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Categories of Web Service messages: data-oriented v s action-oriented - 2/4/2002 10:28:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Categories of Web Service messages: data-oriented vs action-oriented - 2/4/2002 10:49:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Categories of Web Service messages: data-oriented v - 2/4/2002 11:26:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Co-operating with Architectural Forms - 2/4/2002 11:13:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Co-operating with Architectural Forms - 2/5/2002 10:13:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] looking for XML vendor in Santa Clara - 2/4/2002 11:19:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Categories of Web Service messages: data-oriented v - 2/4/2002 11:51:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Categories of Web Service messages: data-oriented vs action-oriented - 2/5/2002 12:42:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] Categories of Web Service messages: data-oriented v saction-oriented - 2/5/2002 1:13:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] Categories of Web Service messages: data-oriented v s action-oriented - 2/5/2002 2:22:00 AM
SV: [xml-dev] Categories of Web Service messages: data-oriented v saction-oriented - 2/5/2002 9:06:00 AM
ANN: Ents 0.2 - 2/5/2002 2:27:00 PM
_Lastworda betst_ - 2/5/2002 2:31:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Categories of Web Service messages: data-oriented vs action-oriented - 2/5/2002 2:33:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Categories of Web Service messages: data-oriented vs action-oriented - 2/5/2002 2:53:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Categories of Web Service messages: data-oriented vs action-oriented - 2/5/2002 2:55:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Categories of Web Service messages: data-oriented vs action-oriented - 2/5/2002 2:59:00 PM
Namespace terminology - 2/5/2002 9:04:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Namespace terminology - 2/5/2002 9:14:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Namespace terminology - 2/5/2002 10:40:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Namespace terminology - 2/5/2002 11:13:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Namespace terminology - 2/5/2002 11:17:00 PM
Default attribute values at a higher level element? - 2/5/2002 9:17:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Categories of Web Service messages: data-oriented vs action-oriented - 2/5/2002 9:37:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Categories of Web Service messages: data-oriented vs action-oriented - 2/5/2002 9:43:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Categories of Web Service messages: data-oriented v s action-oriented - 2/5/2002 10:20:00 PM
Using to enforce rules - 2/5/2002 10:39:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Using to enforce rules - 2/6/2002 12:08:00 AM
XMLNoteTree Latest release available for download - 2/6/2002 8:06:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Co-operating with Architectural Forms - 2/5/2002 11:38:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Co-operating with Architectural Forms - 2/6/2002 1:31:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] Categories of Web Service messages: data-oriented v s action-oriented - 2/5/2002 11:52:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Categories of Web Service messages: data-oriented vs action-oriented - 2/6/2002 12:02:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Categories of Web Service messages: data-oriented vs action-oriented - 2/6/2002 6:02:00 AM
DTD validation without a DOCTYPE - 2/6/2002 2:37:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] DTD validation without a DOCTYPE - 2/6/2002 2:55:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] DTD validation without a DOCTYPE - 2/11/2002 7:17:00 PM
FW: [xml-dev] DTD validation without a DOCTYPE - 2/6/2002 3:11:00 AM
Re: FW: [xml-dev] DTD validation without a DOCTYPE - 2/6/2002 8:58:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] A heavier-weight proposal for character entitydefinition - 2/6/2002 5:29:00 AM
XMLNoteTree Latest release available for download - with smaller URL - 2/6/2002 8:09:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Better is Still Better - 2/6/2002 8:44:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] DTD validation without a DOCTYPE - 2/6/2002 8:44:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] DTD validation without a DOCTYPE - 2/7/2002 10:09:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] Categories of Web Service messages: data-oriented v s action-oriented - 2/6/2002 8:59:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Categories of Web Service messages: data-oriented v - 2/6/2002 9:16:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Categories of Web Service messages: data-oriented v - 2/6/2002 9:43:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Categories of Web Service messages: data-oriented v - 2/6/2002 10:29:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Categories of Web Service messages: data-oriented v - 2/7/2002 5:24:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Categories of Web Service messages: data-oriented v - 2/6/2002 10:38:00 PM
XML Schema Simple Type Definitions - 2/6/2002 11:00:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] XML Schema Simple Type Definitions - 2/6/2002 11:29:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] XML Schema Simple Type Definitions - 2/7/2002 12:18:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] XML Schema Simple Type Definitions - 2/7/2002 12:25:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] XML Schema Simple Type Definitions - 2/6/2002 11:37:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] A heavier-weight proposal for character entitydefinition - 2/7/2002 1:49:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] A heavier-weight proposal for character entity definition - 2/7/2002 4:57:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] A heavier-weight proposal for character entity definition - 2/7/2002 7:37:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] A heavier-weight proposal for character entitydefinition - 2/7/2002 10:09:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] A heavier-weight proposal for character entitydefinition - 2/7/2002 2:41:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Using to enforce rules - 2/7/2002 7:23:00 AM
Documents within documents - 2/7/2002 12:25:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Documents within documents - 2/8/2002 10:12:00 AM
XML to UML - 2/7/2002 12:55:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] XML to UML - 2/7/2002 1:01:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] XML to UML - 2/7/2002 1:16:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] XML to UML - 2/7/2002 1:39:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] What am I overlooking...? (namespaces, validation, & xsv) - 2/7/2002 2:00:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] XML to UML - 2/7/2002 2:05:00 PM
[xml-dev] XML to UML - 2/7/2002 2:47:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Categories of Web Service messages: data-oriented vs action-oriented - 2/7/2002 3:01:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Categories of Web Service messages: data-oriented vs action-oriented - 2/7/2002 3:10:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Categories of Web Service messages: data-oriented vs action-oriented - 2/7/2002 10:07:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] XML to UML - 2/7/2002 3:03:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Categories of Web Service messages: data-oriented vs action-oriented - 2/7/2002 3:36:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Categories of Web Service messages: data-oriented vs action-oriented - 2/7/2002 4:12:00 PM
WSIO (was Re: [xml-dev] Categories of Web Service messages) - 2/7/2002 5:04:00 PM
ANN: STM-ML - a markup language for scientific publishing - 2/7/2002 3:52:00 PM
XML Abstract Query anybody ? - 2/7/2002 4:26:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] XML Abstract Query anybody ? - 2/7/2002 5:29:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Categories of Web Service messages: data-oriented vs action-oriented - 2/7/2002 4:49:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] WSIO (was Re: [xml-dev] Categories of Web Service messages) - 2/7/2002 5:27:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] WSIO and Good is Better - 2/7/2002 7:54:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] MODERATORIAL: Five years of XML-DEV - 2/7/2002 5:31:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] MODERATORIAL: Five years of XML-DEV - 2/7/2002 5:37:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] MODERATORIAL: Five years of XML-DEV - 2/7/2002 5:38:00 PM
Schema tutorials (was RE: [xml-dev] MODERATORIAL: Five years of XML-DEV) - 2/7/2002 5:38:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] XML Schema Simple Graphical User Interface - 2/7/2002 6:31:00 PM
Displaying XML in IE window - 2/7/2002 7:48:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] WSIO and Good is Better - 2/7/2002 8:14:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] WSIO and Good is Better - 2/8/2002 4:00:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] Using to enforce rules - 2/7/2002 8:22:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Documents within documents - 2/7/2002 8:28:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] WSIO and Good is Better - 2/7/2002 9:36:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Categories of Web Service messages: data-oriented v - 2/7/2002 9:55:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Categories of Web Service messages: data-oriented v - 2/7/2002 11:24:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Categories of Web Service messages: data-oriented v - 2/8/2002 4:43:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Categories of Web Service messages: data-oriented v - 2/8/2002 5:02:00 AM
Number of methods. - 2/8/2002 11:21:00 AM
Re: Number of methods. - 2/8/2002 2:37:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] WSIO (was Re: [xml-dev] Categories of Web Service messages) - 2/7/2002 10:14:00 PM
Re: RE: [xml-dev] WSIO (was Re: [xml-dev] Categories of Web Service messages) - 2/7/2002 10:47:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Categories of Web Service messages: data-oriented vs action-oriented - 2/7/2002 10:18:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Categories of Web Service messages: data-oriented v - 2/7/2002 10:39:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Categories of Web Service messages: data-oriented vs action-oriented - 2/7/2002 10:40:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Categories of Web Service messages: data-oriented vs action-oriented - 2/10/2002 7:42:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] WSIO and Good is Better - 2/7/2002 11:03:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] MODERATORIAL: Five years of XML-DEV - 2/7/2002 11:33:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Categories of Web Service messages: data-oriented v - 2/8/2002 12:38:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Categories of Web Service messages: data-oriented v - 2/8/2002 5:40:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] Categories of Web Service messages: data-oriented v - 2/8/2002 8:56:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] Documents within documents - 2/8/2002 12:54:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Documents within documents - 2/8/2002 1:29:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] Documents within documents - 2/8/2002 1:49:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Documents within documents - 2/8/2002 2:30:00 AM
Doctypes again (was Re: [xml-dev] Documents within documents) - 2/8/2002 3:09:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Documents within documents - 2/8/2002 9:29:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Documents within documents - 2/8/2002 1:46:00 PM
XML Designing Problems. - 2/8/2002 4:39:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] XML Designing Problems. - 2/8/2002 9:06:00 AM
How to map to desierd data types?. - 2/8/2002 4:56:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Documents within documents - 2/8/2002 5:40:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] XML Designing Problems. - 2/8/2002 9:56:00 AM
Re: XML to UML - 2/8/2002 11:23:00 AM
Simple Schema - 2/8/2002 12:02:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Simple Schema - 2/8/2002 5:21:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Simple Schema - 2/8/2002 12:10:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Documents within documents - 2/8/2002 12:17:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Documents within documents - 2/8/2002 12:50:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Documents within documents - 2/10/2002 7:14:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] XML Designing Problems. - 2/8/2002 1:18:00 PM
[ANN]: DecisionSoft announce release of XPath for Xerces-C - 2/8/2002 5:38:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] WSIO and Good is Better - 2/8/2002 6:24:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Doctypes again (was Re: [xml-dev] Documents within documents) - 2/8/2002 6:29:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] WSIO and Good is Better - 2/8/2002 6:35:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] WSIO and Good is Better - 2/8/2002 6:41:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Doctypes again (was Re: [xml-dev] Documents within documents) - 2/8/2002 6:41:00 PM
ANN: Oracle XDK 9.2.0.1 Production Release online - 2/8/2002 7:11:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Categories of Web Service messages: data-oriented v - 2/8/2002 9:31:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Categories of Web Service messages: data-oriented v - 2/9/2002 4:43:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] Categories of Web Service messages: data-oriented v - 2/8/2002 9:35:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Categories of Web Service messages: data-oriented v - 2/9/2002 4:44:00 AM
Default values - 2/8/2002 11:10:00 PM
creating links - 2/8/2002 11:14:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Categories of Web Service messages: data-oriented v - 2/9/2002 12:35:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Categories of Web Service messages: data-oriented v - 2/9/2002 4:27:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] XML Designing Problems. - 2/9/2002 12:56:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] Web Services and REST: what is to be done? - 2/9/2002 1:36:00 AM
Input and output routines for Unicode in C++ - 2/9/2002 3:37:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] Categories of Web Service messages: data-oriented v - 2/10/2002 12:18:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Categories of Web Service messages: data-oriented v - 2/10/2002 6:20:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Categories of Web Service messages: data-oriented v - 2/10/2002 7:11:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] Input and output routines for Unicode in C++ - 2/10/2002 12:21:00 AM
One more time: Default attribute values at a higher level element? - 2/10/2002 3:34:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] One more time: Default attribute values at a higher level element? - 2/10/2002 11:35:00 PM
Happy birthday - 2/10/2002 7:01:00 PM
Compring two XML docs from Java - 2/10/2002 7:46:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Compring two XML docs from Java - 2/11/2002 11:03:00 AM
[Ann - Zvon] Templatotron - 2/11/2002 9:35:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] [Ann - Zvon] Templatotron - 2/11/2002 11:55:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Simple Schema - 2/11/2002 11:32:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] Simple Schema - 2/11/2002 11:59:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Simple Schema - 2/11/2002 12:15:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Simple Schema - 2/11/2002 1:08:00 PM
WSIO- With Name - 2/11/2002 2:27:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] WSIO- With Name - 2/11/2002 3:59:00 PM
Solved: Default attribute values at a higher level element? - 2/11/2002 3:14:00 PM
conditions in xml schema - 2/11/2002 4:04:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] conditions in xml schema - 2/11/2002 4:17:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] WSIO- With Name - 2/11/2002 4:07:00 PM
MathML to English - 2/11/2002 4:39:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] MathML to English - 2/11/2002 11:40:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] WSIO- With Name - 2/11/2002 4:45:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] WSIO- With Name - 2/11/2002 6:05:00 PM
REST has too many verbs - 2/11/2002 5:20:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] REST has too many verbs - 2/11/2002 5:40:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] REST has too many verbs - 2/11/2002 5:54:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] REST has too many verbs - 2/11/2002 6:18:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] REST has too many verbs - 2/11/2002 6:22:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] REST has too many verbs - 2/11/2002 6:32:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] REST has too many verbs - 2/11/2002 6:34:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] REST has too many verbs - 2/11/2002 6:58:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] REST has too many verbs - 2/11/2002 7:06:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] REST has too many verbs - 2/11/2002 7:08:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] REST has too many verbs - 2/11/2002 7:10:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] REST has too many verbs - 2/11/2002 7:16:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] REST has too many verbs - 2/11/2002 8:23:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] REST has too many verbs - 2/11/2002 8:59:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] REST has too many verbs - 2/11/2002 10:00:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] REST has too many verbs - 2/11/2002 10:06:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] REST has too many verbs - 2/12/2002 1:02:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] REST has too many verbs - 2/12/2002 3:08:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] REST has too many verbs - 2/12/2002 3:52:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] REST has too many verbs - 2/12/2002 4:23:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] REST has too many verbs - 2/12/2002 5:21:00 AM
A priori agreement - 2/12/2002 11:28:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] REST has too many verbs - 2/12/2002 1:59:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] REST has too many verbs - 2/12/2002 10:08:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] REST has too many verbs - 2/11/2002 10:50:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] REST has too many verbs - 2/12/2002 1:56:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] REST has too many verbs - 2/12/2002 2:47:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] REST has too many verbs - 2/12/2002 3:05:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] REST has too many verbs - 2/12/2002 10:27:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] REST has too many verbs - 2/12/2002 10:43:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] REST has too many verbs - 2/12/2002 11:38:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] REST has too many verbs - 2/12/2002 9:52:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] REST has too many verbs - 2/11/2002 11:37:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] REST has too many verbs - 2/12/2002 5:31:00 AM
commodity web - 2/12/2002 3:01:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] REST has too many verbs - 2/15/2002 4:33:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] REST has too many verbs - 2/11/2002 8:54:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] REST has too many verbs - 2/11/2002 9:12:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] REST has too many verbs - 2/11/2002 9:25:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] REST has too many verbs - 2/11/2002 9:25:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] REST has too many verbs - 2/11/2002 9:25:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] REST has too many verbs - 2/11/2002 9:25:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] REST has too many verbs - 2/11/2002 10:25:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] REST has too many verbs - 2/12/2002 5:15:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] REST has too many verbs - 2/12/2002 5:20:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] REST has too many verbs - 2/12/2002 9:51:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] REST has too many verbs - 2/12/2002 10:03:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] REST has too many verbs - 2/12/2002 10:15:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] REST has too many verbs - 2/12/2002 10:18:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] WSIO- With Name - 2/11/2002 6:44:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] WSIO- With Name - 2/11/2002 8:34:00 PM
[announce] XML Spy 4.3 Suite Released - adds SOAP debugger, XPath analyzer, SQLXML Support. - 2/11/2002 7:25:00 PM
posting an XML data - 2/11/2002 7:33:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] posting an XML data - 2/12/2002 6:26:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] WSIO- With Name - 2/11/2002 9:12:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] WSIO- With Name - 2/12/2002 5:05:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] REST has too many verbs - 2/11/2002 9:34:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] REST has too many verbs - 2/11/2002 10:46:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] REST has too many verbs - 2/11/2002 10:27:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] REST has too many verbs - 2/11/2002 11:24:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] REST has too many verbs - 2/11/2002 11:24:00 PM
Array of #PCDATA - 2/12/2002 5:45:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] Array of #PCDATA - 2/12/2002 5:54:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Array of #PCDATA - 2/12/2002 7:25:00 AM
DOM parsers & default values - 2/12/2002 1:03:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] REST has too many verbs - 2/12/2002 1:03:00 PM
SGML Parsers - 2/12/2002 2:00:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] REST has too many verbs - 2/12/2002 2:13:00 PM
Why REST? (RE: [xml-dev] WSIO- With Name) - 2/12/2002 3:06:00 PM
Re: Why REST? (RE: [xml-dev] WSIO- With Name) - 2/12/2002 3:35:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] commodity web - 2/12/2002 3:22:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] REST has too many verbs - 2/12/2002 3:26:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] REST has too many verbs - 2/12/2002 3:46:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] REST has too many verbs - 2/12/2002 3:50:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] REST has too many verbs - 2/12/2002 4:00:00 PM
Stylesheets for generating XML Schema documentation - 2/12/2002 4:09:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Stylesheets for generating XML Schema documentation - 2/12/2002 10:12:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Re: Why REST? (RE: [xml-dev] WSIO- With Name) - 2/12/2002 4:21:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Why REST? (RE: [xml-dev] WSIO- With Name) - 2/12/2002 4:49:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Why REST? (RE: [xml-dev] WSIO- With Name) - 2/12/2002 5:14:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Why REST? (RE: [xml-dev] WSIO- With Name) - 2/12/2002 5:33:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Why REST? (RE: [xml-dev] WSIO- With Name) - 2/12/2002 5:44:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Why REST? (RE: [xml-dev] WSIO- With Name) - 2/12/2002 6:15:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Why REST? (RE: [xml-dev] WSIO- With Name) - 2/12/2002 6:25:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Why REST? (RE: [xml-dev] WSIO- With Name) - 2/12/2002 6:50:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Why REST? (RE: [xml-dev] WSIO- With Name) - 2/12/2002 7:05:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Why REST? (RE: [xml-dev] WSIO- With Name) - 2/12/2002 7:29:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Why REST? (RE: [xml-dev] WSIO- With Name) - 2/12/2002 9:27:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Why REST? (RE: [xml-dev] WSIO- With Name) - 2/12/2002 9:45:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Why REST? (RE: [xml-dev] WSIO- With Name) - 2/12/2002 9:50:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Why REST? (RE: [xml-dev] WSIO- With Name) - 2/12/2002 10:19:00 PM
"Abstract" URIs - 2/12/2002 11:34:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] "Abstract" URIs - 2/13/2002 12:58:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] "Abstract" URIs - 2/13/2002 1:04:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] "Abstract" URIs - 2/12/2002 11:40:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] "Abstract" URIs - 2/13/2002 10:59:00 AM
URIs are simply names was: Re: [xml-dev] "Abstract" URIs - 2/13/2002 12:09:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] URIs are simply names was: Re: [xml-dev] "Abstract"URIs - 2/13/2002 1:05:00 PM
Re: URIs are simply names was: Re: [xml-dev] "Abstract" URIs - 2/13/2002 12:17:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] URIs are simply names was: Re: [xml-dev] "Abstract" URIs - 2/13/2002 1:43:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] URIs are simply names was: Re: [xml-dev] "Abstract"URIs - 2/13/2002 2:05:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] URIs are simply names was: Re: [xml-dev] "Abstract" URIs - 2/13/2002 2:15:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] URIs are simply names was: Re: [xml-dev] "Abstract"URIs - 2/14/2002 1:01:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] URIs are simply names was: Re: [xml-dev] "Abstract" URIs - 2/14/2002 1:10:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] URIs are simply names was: Re: [xml-dev] "Abstract"URIs - 2/15/2002 9:40:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] URIs are simply names was: Re: [xml-dev] "Abstract" URIs - 2/14/2002 4:10:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] URIs are simply names was: Re: [xml-dev] "Abstract"URIs - 2/15/2002 10:31:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] URIs are simply names was: Re: [xml-dev] "Abstract"URIs - 2/15/2002 3:17:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] URIs are simply names was: Re: [xml-dev]"Abstract"URIs - 2/18/2002 2:00:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] URIs are simply names was: Re: [xml-dev] "Abstract" URIs - 2/13/2002 3:28:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] URIs are simply names was: Re: [xml-dev] "Abstract" URIs - 2/13/2002 3:48:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] URIs are simply names was: Re: [xml-dev] "Abstract" URIs - 2/13/2002 4:16:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] URIs are simply names was: Re: [xml-dev] "Abstract" URIs - 2/13/2002 4:31:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] URIs are simply names was: Re: [xml-dev] "Abstract" URIs - 2/14/2002 3:40:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] URIs are simply names was: Re: [xml-dev] "Abstract"URIs - 2/14/2002 12:53:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] URIs are simply names was: Re: [xml-dev] "Abstract" URIs - 2/14/2002 6:35:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] URIs are simply names was: Re: [xml-dev] "Abstract"URIs - 2/14/2002 7:00:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] URIs are simply names was: Re: [xml-dev]"Abstract"URIs - 2/15/2002 10:31:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] URIs are simply names was: Re: [xml-dev]"Abstract"URIs - 2/15/2002 6:28:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] URIs are simply names was: Re: [xml-dev]"Abstract"URIs - 2/15/2002 11:54:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] URIs are simply names was: Re: [xml-dev] "Abstract" URIs - 2/14/2002 8:45:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] URIs are simply names was: Re: [xml-dev] "Abstract"URIs - 2/15/2002 10:31:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] URIs are simply names R - 2/15/2002 2:49:00 PM
Two Perspectives (was Re: [xml-dev] URIs are simply names R) - 2/15/2002 5:30:00 PM
Re: Two Perspectives (was Re: [xml-dev] URIs are simply names R) - 2/18/2002 2:18:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Two Perspectives (was Re: [xml-dev] URIs are simply names R) - 2/18/2002 2:36:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Two Perspectives (was Re: [xml-dev] URIs are simplynames R) - 2/18/2002 8:50:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Two Perspectives (was Re: [xml-dev] URIs are simply names R) - 2/19/2002 1:37:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] URIs are simply names was: Re: [xml-dev] "Abstract" URIs - 2/13/2002 6:44:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] URIs are simply names was: Re: [xml-dev] "Abstract" URIs - 2/13/2002 8:21:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] URIs are simply names was: Re: [xml-dev] "Abstract" URIs - 2/13/2002 8:41:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] URIs are simply names was: Re: [xml-dev] "Abstract" URIs - 2/13/2002 9:10:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] URIs are simply names was: Re: [xml-dev] "Abstract"URIs - 2/14/2002 12:53:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] URIs are simply names was: Re: [xml-dev] "Abstract" URIs - 2/14/2002 2:30:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] URIs are simply names was: Re: [xml-dev] "Abstract"URIs - 2/14/2002 3:51:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] URIs are simply names was: Re: [xml-dev]"Abstract"URIs - 2/15/2002 10:08:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] URIs are simply names was: Re: [xml-dev]"Abstract"URIs - 2/15/2002 6:10:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] URIs are simply names was: Re: [xml-dev]"Abstract"URIs - 2/15/2002 6:45:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] URIs are simply names was: Re: [xml-dev]"Abstract"URIs - 2/16/2002 4:38:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] URIs are simply names was: Re:[xml-dev]"Abstract"URIs - 2/18/2002 2:21:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] URIs are simply names was: Re:[xml-dev]"Abstract"URIs - 2/19/2002 11:06:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] URIs are simply names was:Re:[xml-dev]"Abstract"URIs - 2/19/2002 2:19:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] URIs are simply names was: Re: [xml-dev]"Abstract"URIs - 2/16/2002 5:01:00 PM
standardization (was Re: [xml-dev] URIs are simply names) - 2/16/2002 5:16:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] URIs are simply names was: Re: [xml-dev]"Abstract"URIs - 2/16/2002 5:20:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] URIs are simply names was: Re: [xml-dev]"Abstract"URIs - 2/16/2002 5:29:00 PM
Why REST was Re: [xml-dev] URIs are simply names - 2/16/2002 8:25:00 PM
Re: Why REST was Re: [xml-dev] URIs are simply names - 2/16/2002 9:17:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Why REST was Re: [xml-dev] URIs are simply names - 2/17/2002 4:00:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Why REST was Re: [xml-dev] URIs are simply names - 2/17/2002 4:59:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Why REST was Re: [xml-dev] URIs are simply names - 2/17/2002 5:27:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Why REST was Re: [xml-dev] URIs are simply names - 2/17/2002 4:05:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Why REST was Re: [xml-dev] URIs are simply names - 2/17/2002 5:09:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Why REST was Re: [xml-dev] URIs are simply names - 2/17/2002 5:36:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Why REST was Re: [xml-dev] URIs are simply names - 2/17/2002 1:27:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Why REST was Re: [xml-dev] URIs are simply names - 2/17/2002 1:47:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Why REST - 2/17/2002 3:01:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Why REST - 2/17/2002 3:47:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Why REST - 2/18/2002 11:44:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Why REST - 2/18/2002 7:35:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Why REST - 2/19/2002 1:52:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Why REST - 2/19/2002 5:05:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Why REST was Re: [xml-dev] URIs are simply names - 2/17/2002 4:49:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Why REST was Re: [xml-dev] URIs are simply names - 2/17/2002 6:49:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Why REST was Re: [xml-dev] URIs are simply names - 2/17/2002 3:20:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Why REST was Re: [xml-dev] URIs are simply names - 2/18/2002 4:54:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Why REST was Re: [xml-dev] URIs are simply names - 2/18/2002 6:10:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Why REST was Re: [xml-dev] URIs are simply names - 2/18/2002 7:06:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Why REST was Re: [xml-dev] URIs are simply names - 2/17/2002 4:09:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Why REST was Re: [xml-dev] URIs are simply names - 2/17/2002 5:20:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Why REST was Re: [xml-dev] URIs are simply names - 2/17/2002 5:26:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Why REST was Re: [xml-dev] URIs are simply names - 2/17/2002 6:13:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Why REST was Re: [xml-dev] URIs are simply names - 2/17/2002 7:05:00 PM
Namespace and URIs - 2/17/2002 11:24:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Namespace and URIs - 2/18/2002 12:58:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Namespace and URIs - 2/18/2002 2:27:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Namespace and URIs - 2/18/2002 12:14:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Namespace and URIs - 2/18/2002 1:27:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Namespace and URIs - 2/18/2002 3:26:00 AM
Crossposting: was Namespaces and URIs - 2/18/2002 5:49:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] URIs are simply names was: Re: [xml-dev] "Abstract" URIs - 2/13/2002 9:26:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] URIs are simply names was: Re: [xml-dev] "Abstract" URIs - 2/13/2002 9:39:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] URIs are simply names was: Re: [xml-dev] "Abstract" URIs - 2/13/2002 10:50:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Why REST? (RE: [xml-dev] WSIO- With Name) - 2/12/2002 11:29:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Why REST? (RE: [xml-dev] WSIO- With Name) - 2/12/2002 11:15:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Why REST? (RE: [xml-dev] WSIO- With Name) - 2/13/2002 12:13:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Why REST? (RE: [xml-dev] WSIO- With Name) - 2/13/2002 3:17:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Why REST? (RE: [xml-dev] WSIO- With Name) - 2/12/2002 7:59:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Why REST? (RE: [xml-dev] WSIO- With Name) - 2/12/2002 6:11:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Why REST? (RE: [xml-dev] WSIO- With Name) - 2/12/2002 11:11:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Why REST? (RE: [xml-dev] WSIO- With Name) - 2/13/2002 10:52:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Why REST? (RE: [xml-dev] WSIO- With Name) - 2/13/2002 3:24:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Why REST? (RE: [xml-dev] WSIO- With Name) - 2/13/2002 3:32:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] REST has too many verbs - 2/12/2002 4:30:00 PM
Validation of xm document using a xml schema - 2/12/2002 5:06:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Validation of xm document using a xml schema - 2/13/2002 5:13:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Re: Why REST? (RE: [xml-dev] WSIO- With Name) - 2/12/2002 5:27:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Why REST? (RE: [xml-dev] WSIO- With Name) - 2/12/2002 6:01:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] REST has too many verbs - 2/12/2002 5:43:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] REST has too many verbs - 2/12/2002 5:53:00 PM
Principle of Sustainable Complexity - 2/12/2002 6:21:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Principle of Sustainable Complexity - 2/12/2002 6:42:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Re: Why REST? (RE: [xml-dev] WSIO- With Name) - 2/12/2002 6:48:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Why REST? (RE: [xml-dev] WSIO- With Name) - 2/12/2002 9:45:00 PM
Service discovery - 2/13/2002 12:34:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] Principle of Sustainable Complexity - 2/12/2002 7:08:00 PM
XML utilities (was RE: [xml-dev] Principle of SustainableComplexity) - 2/12/2002 8:15:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Principle of Sustainable Complexity - 2/13/2002 5:25:00 PM
Xerces error report "attribute 'foo' should be qualified" - 2/12/2002 7:39:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Xerces error report "attribute 'foo' should be qualified" - 2/12/2002 11:35:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Xerces error report... answered - 2/12/2002 8:12:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Principle of Sustainable Complexity - 2/12/2002 9:43:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Principle of Sustainable Complexity - 2/12/2002 11:25:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Re: Why REST? (RE: [xml-dev] WSIO- With Name) - 2/12/2002 9:44:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Why REST? (RE: [xml-dev] WSIO- With Name) - 2/12/2002 10:00:00 PM
REST and HTTP extensions (was Re: [xml-dev] Re: Why REST? ) - 2/12/2002 10:16:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Why REST? (RE: [xml-dev] WSIO- With Name) - 2/13/2002 10:41:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Why REST? (RE: [xml-dev] WSIO- With Name) - 2/14/2002 11:53:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Re: Why REST? (RE: [xml-dev] WSIO- With Name) - 2/12/2002 9:51:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] REST has too many verbs - 2/12/2002 10:30:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] REST has too many verbs - 2/12/2002 10:44:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] REST has too many verbs - 2/12/2002 10:58:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] REST has too many verbs - 2/12/2002 11:06:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] REST has too many verbs - 2/12/2002 11:27:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] REST has too many verbs - 2/12/2002 11:23:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] REST has too many verbs - 2/12/2002 11:29:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Principle of Sustainable Complexity - 2/12/2002 11:40:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Principle of Sustainable Complexity - 2/12/2002 11:53:00 PM
[Fwd: Re: [xml-dev] Schematron/Schema market share] - 2/12/2002 11:40:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] REST has too many verbs - 2/12/2002 11:41:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] REST has too many verbs - 2/12/2002 11:41:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] REST has too many verbs - 2/12/2002 11:43:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Re: Why REST? (RE: [xml-dev] WSIO- With Name) - 2/13/2002 1:19:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Why REST? (RE: [xml-dev] WSIO- With Name) - 2/13/2002 3:37:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] Re: Why REST? (RE: [xml-dev] WSIO- With Name) - 2/13/2002 1:22:00 AM
Resource representations - 2/13/2002 1:30:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] REST and HTTP extensions (was Re: [xml-dev] Re: Why REST? ) - 2/13/2002 1:27:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] "Abstract" URIs - 2/13/2002 1:33:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] Re: Why REST? (RE: [xml-dev] WSIO- With Name) - 2/13/2002 3:51:00 AM
WSIO vs. Semantic Web - 2/13/2002 4:18:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] WSIO vs. Semantic Web - 2/13/2002 4:51:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] WSIO vs. Semantic Web - 2/13/2002 6:17:00 PM
Type of an Element - 2/13/2002 5:16:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] WSIO vs. Semantic Web - 2/13/2002 6:03:00 AM
Re: RE: [xml-dev] WSIO vs. Semantic Web - 2/13/2002 1:40:00 PM
Architectural Forms, A Summary - 2/13/2002 12:19:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Architectural Forms, A Summary - 2/13/2002 7:31:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Architectural Forms, A Summary - 2/14/2002 4:45:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Architectural Forms, A Summary - 2/14/2002 7:37:00 PM
Names and locations (WAS: Why REST?) - 2/13/2002 12:41:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Names and locations (WAS: Why REST?) - 2/13/2002 1:07:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Names and locations (WAS: Why REST?) - 2/13/2002 2:04:00 PM
Streaming Transformations for XML - 2/13/2002 1:59:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Streaming Transformations for XML - 2/13/2002 3:09:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Streaming Transformations for XML - 2/13/2002 3:24:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Streaming Transformations for XML - 2/14/2002 8:55:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Streaming Transformations for XML - 2/14/2002 3:33:00 PM
Errors in Kendall Clark's xml.com article on QNames - 2/13/2002 2:01:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Errors in Kendall Clark's xml.com article on QNames - 2/13/2002 2:21:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Errors in Kendall Clark's xml.com article on QNames - 2/13/2002 2:35:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Errors in Kendall Clark's xml.com article on QNames - 2/13/2002 4:16:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Errors in Kendall Clark's xml.com article on QNames - 2/13/2002 4:23:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Errors in Kendall Clark's xml.com article on QNames - 2/13/2002 4:28:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Errors in Kendall Clark's xml.com article on QNames - 2/13/2002 4:48:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Errors in Kendall Clark's xml.com article on QNames - 2/13/2002 4:56:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Errors in Kendall Clark's xml.com article on QNames - 2/13/2002 4:59:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Errors in Kendall Clark's xml.com article on QNames - 2/13/2002 5:07:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Errors in Kendall Clark's xml.com article on QNames - 2/13/2002 5:20:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Errors in Kendall Clark's xml.com article on QNames - 2/13/2002 6:28:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Errors in Kendall Clark's xml.com article on QNames - 2/13/2002 7:16:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Errors in Kendall Clark's xml.com article on QNames - 2/13/2002 8:09:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Errors in Kendall Clark's xml.com article on QNames - 2/13/2002 8:44:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] "Abstract" URIs - 2/13/2002 2:24:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Service discovery - 2/13/2002 2:33:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Service discovery - 2/13/2002 4:26:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Re: Why REST? (RE: [xml-dev] WSIO- With Name) - 2/13/2002 2:38:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] WSIO vs. Semantic Web - 2/13/2002 2:50:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] WSIO vs. Semantic Web - 2/13/2002 2:56:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] WSIO vs. Semantic Web - 2/13/2002 5:37:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] WSIO vs. Semantic Web - 2/13/2002 7:09:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] WSIO vs. Semantic Web - 2/13/2002 2:58:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] WSIO vs. Semantic Web - 2/13/2002 3:37:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Streaming Transformations for XML - 2/13/2002 3:13:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Names and locations (WAS: Why REST?) - 2/13/2002 3:20:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Names and locations (WAS: Why REST?) - 2/14/2002 12:53:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] WSIO vs. Semantic Web - 2/13/2002 3:41:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] WSIO vs. Semantic Web - 2/13/2002 3:47:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] WSIO vs. Semantic Web - 2/13/2002 3:59:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] WSIO vs. Semantic Web - 2/13/2002 3:59:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] WSIO vs. Semantic Web - 2/13/2002 4:21:00 PM
RE: RE: [xml-dev] WSIO vs. Semantic Web - 2/13/2002 4:19:00 PM
Web Services Hype and Reality (was RE: [xml-dev] WSIO vs. Semantic Web - 2/13/2002 5:29:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Service discovery - 2/13/2002 4:29:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Service discovery - 2/13/2002 5:32:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] WSIO vs. Semantic Web - 2/13/2002 4:33:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] WSIO vs. Semantic Web - 2/13/2002 5:30:00 PM
Re: RE: [xml-dev] WSIO vs. Semantic Web - 2/13/2002 5:49:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] WSIO vs. Semantic Web - 2/13/2002 5:35:00 PM
Modular XHTML - 2/13/2002 6:17:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] WSIO vs. Semantic Web - 2/13/2002 6:26:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] WSIO vs. Semantic Web - 2/13/2002 7:02:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] WSIO vs. Semantic Web - 2/13/2002 7:56:00 PM
More Patent Lunacies - 2/13/2002 7:05:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Web Services Hype and Reality (was RE: [xml-dev] WSIO vs. Semantic Web - 2/13/2002 7:10:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] WSIO vs. Semantic Web - 2/13/2002 7:20:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] WSIO vs. Semantic Web - 2/13/2002 7:22:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] WSIO vs. Semantic Web - 2/13/2002 7:37:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] WSIO vs. Semantic Web - 2/13/2002 8:04:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] WSIO vs. Semantic Web - 2/13/2002 9:19:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Errors in Kendall Clark's xml.com article on QNames - 2/13/2002 9:20:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] WSIO vs. Semantic Web - 2/13/2002 9:43:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] URIs are simply names was: Re: [xml-dev] "Abstract" URIs - 2/13/2002 10:26:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] URIs are simply names was: Re: [xml-dev] "Abstract" URIs - 2/13/2002 11:17:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] URIs are simply names was: Re: [xml-dev] "Abstract" URIs - 2/14/2002 1:20:00 AM
RE: FW: [xml-dev] living fossil? - 2/13/2002 11:29:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Service discovery - 2/13/2002 11:30:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Service discovery - 2/13/2002 11:35:00 PM
Ecclesiastes 12:12 - 2/14/2002 12:17:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Ecclesiastes 12:12 - 2/14/2002 12:28:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Ecclesiastes 12:12 - 2/14/2002 1:55:00 AM
Hook Stuff Together - 2/14/2002 1:19:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Hook Stuff Together - 2/14/2002 6:44:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Hook Stuff Together - 2/14/2002 6:28:00 PM
Layers and QNames - 2/14/2002 7:24:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] Streaming Transformations for XML - 2/14/2002 9:33:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] Streaming Transformations for XML - 2/14/2002 11:41:00 AM
Redefining ComplexType - 2/14/2002 1:30:00 PM
Is DOM parsing real-time? - 2/14/2002 4:14:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Is DOM parsing real-time? - 2/14/2002 4:43:00 PM
Can transformations add/change the DOCTYPE? - 2/14/2002 4:32:00 PM
Web Service Specifications (Was: RE: [xml-dev] URIs are simply names was: Re: [xml-dev] "Abstract" URIs) - 2/14/2002 5:45:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Streaming Transformations for XML - 2/14/2002 9:03:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Streaming Transformations for XML - 2/14/2002 9:16:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Streaming Transformations for XML - 2/15/2002 8:36:00 AM
Table in DTD - 2/14/2002 9:05:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Streaming Transformations for XML - 2/14/2002 10:00:00 PM
DONT REPLY... - 2/14/2002 10:58:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] WSIO vs. Semantic Web - Setting the Record Straight - 2/14/2002 11:06:00 PM
Fwd: Fwd: [xml-dev] Streaming Transformations for XML - 2/15/2002 9:26:00 AM
Re: Streaming Transformations for XML - 2/15/2002 9:54:00 AM
Validating against schema a file with another schema in it. - 2/15/2002 2:17:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Table in DTD - 2/15/2002 4:03:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] WSIO vs. Semantic Web - Setting the Record Straight - 2/15/2002 5:14:00 PM
Re: RE: [xml-dev] WSIO vs. Semantic Web - Setting the Record Straight - 2/15/2002 5:47:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] WSIO vs. Semantic Web - Setting the Record Straight - 2/15/2002 6:12:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] WSIO vs. Semantic Web - Setting the Record Straight - 2/15/2002 7:51:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] WSIO vs. Semantic Web - Setting the Record Straight - 2/15/2002 6:35:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] WSIO vs. Semantic Web - Setting the Record Straight - 2/15/2002 6:49:00 PM
RE: RE: [xml-dev] WSIO vs. Semantic Web - Setting the Record Straight - 2/15/2002 6:38:00 PM
Using XML for data transfer between B2B applications - 2/15/2002 6:55:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] WSIO vs. Semantic Web - Setting the Record Straight - 2/15/2002 7:15:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] WSIO vs. Semantic Web - Setting the Record Straight - 2/15/2002 7:17:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] [OT] "Blackbird" not "Blackberry" Re: [xml-dev] WSIO vs. Semantic Web- Setting the Record Straight - 2/15/2002 7:35:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] [OT] "Blackbird" not "Blackberry" Re: [xml-dev] WSIO vs. Semantic Web- Setting the Record Straight - 2/15/2002 8:11:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] WSIO vs. Semantic Web - Setting the Record Straight - 2/15/2002 7:59:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] WSIO vs. Semantic Web - Setting the Record Straight - 2/15/2002 8:09:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] WSIO vs. Semantic Web - Setting the Record Straight - 2/15/2002 8:07:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] WSIO vs. Semantic Web - Setting the Record Straight - 2/15/2002 8:31:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] WSIO vs. Semantic Web - Setting the Record Straight - 2/15/2002 8:37:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] WSIO vs. Semantic Web - Setting the Record Straight - 2/15/2002 8:14:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] [OT] "Blackbird" not "Blackberry" Re: [xml-dev] WSIO vs. Semantic Web- Setting the Record Straight - 2/15/2002 8:15:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] [OT] "Blackbird" not "Blackberry" Re: [xml-dev] WSIO vs. Semantic Web- Setting the Record Straight - 2/15/2002 10:09:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] WSIO vs. Semantic Web - Setting the Record Straight - 2/15/2002 8:19:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] WSIO vs. Semantic Web - Setting the Record Straight - 2/15/2002 9:44:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] WSIO vs. Semantic Web - Setting the Record Straight - 2/15/2002 8:40:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] WSIO vs. Semantic Web - Setting the Record Straight - 2/15/2002 8:45:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] WSIO vs. Semantic Web - Setting the Record Straight - 2/15/2002 8:51:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] WSIO vs. Semantic Web - Setting the Record Straight - 2/15/2002 9:32:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] WSIO vs. Semantic Web - Setting the Record Straight - 2/15/2002 8:55:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] WSIO vs. Semantic Web - Setting the Record Straight - 2/15/2002 9:54:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] WSIO vs. Semantic Web - Setting the Record Straight - 2/15/2002 9:40:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] WSIO vs. Semantic Web - Setting the Record Straight - 2/15/2002 10:00:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] WSIO vs. Semantic Web - Setting the Record Straight - 2/15/2002 10:33:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] WSIO vs. Semantic Web - Setting the Record Straight - 2/15/2002 10:37:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] REST has too many verbs - 2/16/2002 12:57:00 AM
URI confusions, clarifications - 2/16/2002 9:30:00 PM
creating a URI class - 2/16/2002 9:44:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] creating a URI class - 2/16/2002 10:17:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] creating a URI class - 2/16/2002 10:31:00 PM
Translating RELAX NG to XSD - 2/17/2002 3:18:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Translating RELAX NG to XSD - 2/18/2002 9:09:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] Re: Why REST was Re: [xml-dev] URIs are simply names - 2/17/2002 6:43:00 AM
REST, SQL - 2/17/2002 6:40:00 PM
Traditional RPC - 2/17/2002 7:21:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Traditional RPC - 2/17/2002 10:25:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Traditional RPC - 2/17/2002 11:34:00 PM
reminder: call for papers, XTech/O'Reilly Open Source conference - 2/17/2002 7:33:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Re: Why REST was Re: [xml-dev] URIs are simply names - 2/17/2002 10:43:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Why REST was Re: [xml-dev] URIs are simply names - 2/17/2002 10:49:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Why REST was Re: [xml-dev] URIs are simply names - 2/18/2002 3:13:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] Re: Why REST was Re: [xml-dev] URIs are simply names - 2/17/2002 10:55:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Why REST was Re: [xml-dev] URIs are simply names - 2/18/2002 3:18:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] Re: Why REST was Re: [xml-dev] URIs are simply names - 2/18/2002 3:32:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Why REST was Re: [xml-dev] URIs are simply names - 2/18/2002 3:48:00 AM
Tower of Babbage - 2/18/2002 4:52:00 AM
14 Theses around "Namespace Documents" - 2/18/2002 6:13:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] 14 Theses around "Namespace Documents" - 2/18/2002 2:33:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] 14 Theses around "Namespace Documents" - 2/22/2002 2:57:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Tower of Babbage - 2/18/2002 7:15:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] 14 Theses around "Namespace Documents" - 2/18/2002 8:35:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] 14 Theses around "Namespace Documents" - 2/18/2002 8:07:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Why REST was Re: [xml-dev] URIs are simply names - 2/18/2002 10:40:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] Streaming Transformations for XML - 2/18/2002 11:22:00 AM
Restriction of MIXED - 2/18/2002 12:34:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Restriction of MIXED - 2/18/2002 3:43:00 PM
Javascript Search - 2/18/2002 1:57:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Why REST was Re: [xml-dev] URIs are simply names - 2/18/2002 2:04:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Re: Why REST was Re: [xml-dev] URIs are simply names - 2/18/2002 2:22:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Why REST was Re: [xml-dev] URIs are simply names - 2/18/2002 2:34:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Why REST was Re: [xml-dev] URIs are simply names - 2/18/2002 4:52:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Why REST was Re: [xml-dev] URIs are simply names - 2/18/2002 5:11:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Why REST was Re: [xml-dev] URIs are simply names - 2/18/2002 5:20:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Why REST was Re: [xml-dev] URIs are simply names - 2/18/2002 7:09:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Why REST was Re: [xml-dev] URIs are simply names - 2/18/2002 9:04:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Why REST was Re: [xml-dev] URIs are simply names - 2/18/2002 10:09:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Why REST was Re: [xml-dev] URIs are simply names - 2/18/2002 10:30:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Why REST was Re: [xml-dev] URIs are simply names - 2/18/2002 10:54:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Why REST was Re: [xml-dev] URIs are simply names - 2/19/2002 12:08:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Why REST was Re: [xml-dev] URIs are simply names - 2/19/2002 8:45:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Re: Why REST was Re: [xml-dev] URIs are simply names - 2/19/2002 11:15:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] Traditional RPC - 2/18/2002 3:15:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Traditional RPC - 2/18/2002 3:35:00 PM
Re: RE: [xml-dev] Traditional RPC - 2/18/2002 4:27:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Traditional RPC - 2/18/2002 10:03:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Traditional RPC - 2/19/2002 10:59:00 AM
RE: RE: [xml-dev] Traditional RPC - 2/18/2002 4:50:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Traditional RPC - 2/18/2002 5:24:00 PM
Re: RE: [xml-dev] Traditional RPC - 2/19/2002 6:07:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Traditional RPC - 2/19/2002 11:16:00 AM
namespaces and resources was :Re: [xml-dev] Re: Why REST - 2/18/2002 5:16:00 PM
How to get the attributes from the Document node - 2/18/2002 5:24:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] How to get the attributes from the Document node - 2/18/2002 5:26:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] XML-based Wikis (was RE: [xml-dev] "Smart ASCII" -> XML for authoring? - 2/18/2002 6:22:00 PM
Re: namespaces and resources was :Re: [xml-dev] Re: Why REST - 2/18/2002 7:06:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Traditional RPC - 2/18/2002 7:33:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] 14 Theses around "Namespace Documents" - 2/18/2002 7:49:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Streaming Transformations for XML - 2/18/2002 8:28:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Streaming Transformations for XML - 2/19/2002 3:14:00 PM
XML Parsing Using Expat in LIBWWW API - 2/18/2002 10:04:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Traditional RPC - 2/18/2002 10:16:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Traditional RPC - 2/19/2002 3:36:00 AM
Plumbing versus semantics... - 2/18/2002 10:52:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Plumbing versus semantics... - 2/18/2002 11:32:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Traditional RPC - 2/19/2002 3:42:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Traditional RPC - 2/19/2002 4:19:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Traditional RPC - 2/19/2002 6:22:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] Traditional RPC - 2/19/2002 4:28:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Traditional RPC - 2/19/2002 10:29:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] Traditional RPC - 2/19/2002 4:43:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Traditional RPC - 2/19/2002 10:42:00 AM
XML API vs. Object API - 2/19/2002 8:26:00 AM
regd security while transmitting XML Data - 2/19/2002 8:52:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] regd security while transmitting XML Data - 2/20/2002 5:33:00 PM
ANN: XML database products list updated - 2/19/2002 9:18:00 AM
Help XML Pattern Matching - 2/19/2002 9:19:00 AM
[xml-dev] XML for Corporate Sites - 2/19/2002 9:27:00 AM
Re: [namespaceDocument-8] 14 Theses - 2/19/2002 10:13:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Re: [namespaceDocument-8] 14 Theses - 2/20/2002 1:44:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Re: [namespaceDocument-8] 14 Theses - 2/20/2002 2:05:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Re: [namespaceDocument-8] 14 Theses - 2/20/2002 8:21:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Re: [namespaceDocument-8] 14 Theses - 2/20/2002 9:36:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Re: [namespaceDocument-8] 14 Theses - 2/20/2002 9:50:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Re: [namespaceDocument-8] 14 Theses - 2/20/2002 10:40:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Re: [namespaceDocument-8] 14 Theses - 2/20/2002 7:44:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Re: [namespaceDocument-8] 14 Theses - 2/21/2002 8:48:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] Re: [namespaceDocument-8] 14 Theses - 2/19/2002 10:22:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Re: [namespaceDocument-8] 14 Theses - 2/19/2002 2:31:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Re: [namespaceDocument-8] 14 Theses - 2/19/2002 4:23:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Traditional RPC - 2/19/2002 10:37:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] Traditional RPC - 2/19/2002 2:06:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Traditional RPC - 2/19/2002 2:23:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Traditional RPC - 2/19/2002 2:46:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Traditional RPC - 2/19/2002 5:57:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Traditional RPC - 2/19/2002 6:33:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Traditional RPC - 2/20/2002 11:36:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Traditional RPC - 2/20/2002 12:07:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Traditional RPC - 2/21/2002 11:07:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] Traditional RPC - 2/19/2002 2:27:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Traditional RPC - 2/19/2002 2:35:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Traditional RPC - 2/19/2002 3:11:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Traditional RPC - 2/19/2002 5:29:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Traditional RPC - 2/19/2002 2:50:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Traditional RPC - 2/19/2002 4:36:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Traditional RPC - 2/19/2002 6:08:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Traditional RPC - 2/19/2002 3:00:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] URIs are simply names was:Re:[xml-dev]"Abstract"URIs - 2/19/2002 3:07:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] URIs are simply names was:Re:[xml-dev]"Abstract"URIs - 2/19/2002 6:48:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] URIs are simply names was:Re:[xml-dev]"Abstract"URIs - 2/20/2002 2:02:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Traditional RPC - 2/19/2002 3:08:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Traditional RPC - 2/19/2002 5:20:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Traditional RPC - 2/19/2002 3:26:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Traditional RPC - 2/19/2002 5:41:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Traditional RPC - 2/19/2002 7:15:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Traditional RPC - 2/19/2002 5:53:00 PM
REST made more concrete - 2/19/2002 6:05:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Traditional RPC - 2/19/2002 6:48:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Re: [namespaceDocument-8] 14 Theses - 2/19/2002 6:54:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] REST made more concrete - 2/19/2002 9:07:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Traditional RPC - 2/19/2002 9:12:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Re: [namespaceDocument-8] 14 Theses - 2/19/2002 9:24:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Re: [namespaceDocument-8] 14 Theses - 2/19/2002 9:35:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Re: [namespaceDocument-8] 14 Theses - 2/19/2002 9:45:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Re: [namespaceDocument-8] 14 Theses - 2/20/2002 2:23:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] REST made more concrete - 2/19/2002 9:39:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] REST made more concrete - 2/19/2002 10:03:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] REST made more concrete - 2/19/2002 11:20:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] REST made more concrete - 2/19/2002 10:13:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] REST made more concrete - 2/19/2002 11:18:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Traditional RPC - 2/19/2002 11:24:00 PM
REST made more concrete still - 2/20/2002 1:11:00 AM
RE: [xsl] [Ann - Zvon] Templatotron - 2/20/2002 1:58:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] SOAP-RPC and REST and security - 2/20/2002 6:09:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] SOAP-RPC and REST and security - 2/20/2002 11:32:00 AM
Re: RE: [xml-dev] SOAP-RPC and REST and security - 2/20/2002 2:26:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] SOAP-RPC and REST and security - 2/20/2002 6:48:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] SOAP-RPC and REST and security - 2/20/2002 3:10:00 PM
Xerces2.0.0 Parser - 2/20/2002 6:51:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Xerces2.0.0 Parser - 2/20/2002 1:57:00 PM
simple xslt question - 2/20/2002 5:17:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] simple xslt question - 2/20/2002 5:58:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] SOAP-RPC and REST and security - 2/20/2002 7:53:00 AM
Xerces Parser Installation - 2/20/2002 11:52:00 AM
Regarding Java code to XML - 2/20/2002 12:40:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] SOAP-RPC and REST and security - 2/20/2002 2:23:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Re: [namespaceDocument-8] 14 Theses - 2/20/2002 2:44:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Re: [namespaceDocument-8] 14 Theses - 2/20/2002 2:48:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Re: [namespaceDocument-8] 14 Theses - 2/20/2002 4:57:00 PM
RE: RE: [xml-dev] SOAP-RPC and REST and security - 2/20/2002 2:53:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Re: [namespaceDocument-8] 14 Theses - 2/20/2002 2:58:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Re: [namespaceDocument-8] 14 Theses - 2/20/2002 4:58:00 PM
Re: Namespace dispatching - 2/20/2002 3:05:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] URIs are simply names was:Re:[xml-dev]"Abstract"URIs - 2/20/2002 3:48:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] URIs are simply names was:Re:[xml-dev]"Abstract"URIs - 2/20/2002 4:41:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] SOAP-RPC and REST and security - 2/20/2002 3:49:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] SOAP-RPC and REST and security - 2/20/2002 4:25:00 PM
Inclusion in XML versus SGML - 2/20/2002 4:43:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] SOAP-RPC and REST and security - 2/20/2002 4:43:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] SOAP-RPC and REST and security - 2/20/2002 5:39:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] SOAP-RPC and REST and security - 2/20/2002 4:44:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Re: [namespaceDocument-8] 14 Theses - 2/20/2002 5:21:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Re: [namespaceDocument-8] 14 Theses - 2/20/2002 5:25:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Use of =?iso-8859-1?q?=A9=20in?= XML/XSLT - 2/20/2002 5:44:00 PM
=?iso-8859-1?Q?RE:_=5Bxml-dev=5D_Use_of_=A9_in_XML/XSLT?= - 2/20/2002 6:08:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Re: [namespaceDocument-8] 14 Theses - 2/20/2002 8:46:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Re: [namespaceDocument-8] 14 Theses - 2/20/2002 10:04:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] SOAP-RPC and REST and security - 2/20/2002 9:17:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] SOAP-RPC and REST and security - 2/20/2002 10:14:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] SOAP-RPC and REST and security - 2/21/2002 12:53:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] SOAP-RPC and REST and security - 2/21/2002 1:38:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] SOAP-RPC and REST and security - 2/21/2002 3:10:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] SOAP-RPC and REST and security - 2/21/2002 5:34:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] SOAP-RPC and REST and security - 2/21/2002 5:46:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] SOAP-RPC and REST and security - 2/21/2002 2:28:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] SOAP-RPC and REST and security - 2/21/2002 8:26:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] SOAP-RPC and REST and security - 2/20/2002 9:25:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] SOAP-RPC and REST and security - 2/20/2002 9:47:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] SOAP-RPC and REST and security - 2/20/2002 10:52:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] SOAP-RPC and REST and security - 2/20/2002 9:51:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] SOAP-RPC and REST and security - 2/20/2002 10:59:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] SOAP-RPC and REST and security - 2/20/2002 9:51:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] SOAP-RPC and REST and security - 2/20/2002 11:06:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] SOAP-RPC and REST and security - 2/20/2002 10:06:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Re: [namespaceDocument-8] 14 Theses - 2/20/2002 10:14:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Re: [namespaceDocument-8] 14 Theses - 2/21/2002 4:29:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Re: [namespaceDocument-8] 14 Theses - 2/21/2002 4:40:00 PM
RDDL: minor update - 2/20/2002 10:15:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] RDDL: minor update - 2/20/2002 11:11:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] SOAP-RPC and REST and security - 2/20/2002 10:18:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] SOAP-RPC and REST and security - 2/20/2002 10:21:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] SOAP-RPC and REST and security - 2/20/2002 11:11:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] SOAP-RPC and REST and security - 2/20/2002 10:23:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] SOAP-RPC and REST and security - 2/20/2002 11:05:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] SOAP-RPC and REST and security - 2/21/2002 11:09:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] SOAP-RPC and REST and security - 2/21/2002 4:03:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] SOAP-RPC and REST and security - 2/20/2002 10:24:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] SOAP-RPC and REST and security - 2/20/2002 10:28:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] SOAP-RPC and REST and security - 2/20/2002 11:16:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] SOAP-RPC and REST and security - 2/20/2002 10:32:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Re: [namespaceDocument-8] 14 Theses - 2/20/2002 10:40:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Re: [namespaceDocument-8] 14 Theses - 2/20/2002 10:43:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] SOAP-RPC and REST and security - 2/20/2002 11:20:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] SOAP-RPC and REST and security - 2/21/2002 12:49:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] SOAP-RPC and REST and security - 2/20/2002 11:22:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] SOAP-RPC and REST and security - 2/20/2002 11:24:00 PM
agendas - 2/21/2002 12:06:00 AM
Re: RE: [xml-dev] SOAP-RPC and REST and security - 2/21/2002 12:48:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] SOAP-RPC and REST and security - 2/21/2002 2:27:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] SOAP-RPC and REST and security - 2/20/2002 11:25:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] SOAP-RPC and REST and security - 2/21/2002 4:24:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] SOAP-RPC and REST and security - 2/20/2002 11:29:00 PM
Architecture Description Markup Language - 2/20/2002 11:50:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] SOAP-RPC and REST and security - 2/21/2002 1:38:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] SOAP-RPC and REST and security - 2/21/2002 2:11:00 AM
Two sides of SOAP (was RE: [xml-dev] SOAP-RPC and REST and security) - 2/21/2002 2:38:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] SOAP-RPC and REST and security - 2/21/2002 3:02:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] SOAP-RPC and REST and security - 2/21/2002 4:43:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] SOAP-RPC and REST and security - 2/21/2002 3:35:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] SOAP-RPC and REST and security - 2/21/2002 6:13:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] Two sides of SOAP (was RE: [xml-dev] SOAP-RPC and REST and security) - 2/21/2002 3:37:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] SOAP-RPC and REST and security - 2/21/2002 7:01:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] SOAP-RPC and REST and security - 2/21/2002 3:54:00 PM
Problem with XML Schema - 2/21/2002 7:34:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Problem with XML Schema - 2/21/2002 7:56:00 AM
New XPipe Presentation available - 2/21/2002 8:53:00 AM
[xml-dev] New XPipe Presentation available - 2/22/2002 6:29:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] New XPipe Presentation available - 2/22/2002 7:08:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] New XPipe Presentation available - 2/22/2002 7:38:00 PM
Worse XML tools? - 2/21/2002 10:41:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] Worse XML tools? - 2/21/2002 10:56:00 AM
Why make namespaces so complicated? - 2/21/2002 11:02:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Why make namespaces so complicated? - 2/21/2002 12:02:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] SOAP-RPC and REST and security - 2/21/2002 1:41:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] SOAP-RPC and REST and security - 2/21/2002 3:40:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] SOAP-RPC and REST and security - 2/21/2002 5:15:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] SOAP-RPC and REST and security - 2/21/2002 6:44:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] SOAP-RPC and REST and security - 2/22/2002 10:55:00 AM
What is SOAP? - 2/21/2002 1:59:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] What is SOAP? - 2/21/2002 4:21:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] What is SOAP? - 2/21/2002 4:28:00 PM
even more tunneling - 2/21/2002 2:27:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] even more tunneling - 2/21/2002 2:53:00 PM
3rd party tool - 2/21/2002 3:02:00 PM
Scatter/gather pattern [was: New XPipe Presentation Available] - 2/21/2002 2:43:00 PM
On the use of HTTP as a Substrate - 2/21/2002 2:55:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Two sides of SOAP (was RE: [xml-dev] SOAP-RPC and R EST and security) - 2/21/2002 3:02:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Scatter/gather pattern [was: New XPipe Presentation Available] - 2/21/2002 3:14:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Worse XML tools? - 2/21/2002 3:49:00 PM
Prescod on REST, useful clear summary - 2/21/2002 3:57:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Why make namespaces so complicated? - 2/21/2002 4:04:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Worse XML tools? - 2/21/2002 4:13:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Worse XML tools? - 2/22/2002 6:45:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] Worse XML tools? - 2/21/2002 4:40:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] What is SOAP? - 2/21/2002 4:42:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] What is SOAP? - 2/21/2002 4:56:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Re: [namespaceDocument-8] 14 Theses - 2/21/2002 4:49:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] What is SOAP? - 2/21/2002 5:06:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Why make namespaces so complicated? - 2/21/2002 5:13:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Why make namespaces so complicated? - 2/21/2002 5:15:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Why make namespaces so complicated? - 2/21/2002 5:27:00 PM
ICE Authoring Group Releases Draft Requirements for Industry Comment - 2/21/2002 5:35:00 PM
SOAP and Firewalls - 2/21/2002 8:05:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] SOAP and Firewalls - 2/21/2002 8:25:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] SOAP and Firewalls - 2/21/2002 10:04:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] SOAP and Firewalls - 2/21/2002 10:44:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] SOAP and Firewalls - 2/21/2002 11:15:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] On the use of HTTP as a Substrate - 2/21/2002 9:06:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Why make namespaces so complicated? - 2/21/2002 9:08:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] SOAP and Firewalls - 2/21/2002 9:09:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] SOAP and Firewalls - 2/21/2002 9:16:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] SOAP and Firewalls - 2/21/2002 9:24:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Data-oriented XML [was: Scatter/gather pattern] - 2/21/2002 10:10:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] SOAP-RPC and REST and security - 2/21/2002 10:51:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] SOAP-RPC and REST and security - 2/21/2002 11:26:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Two sides of SOAP (was RE: [xml-dev] SOAP-RPC and R EST and security) - 2/21/2002 11:07:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] SOAP and Firewalls - 2/21/2002 11:21:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] SOAP and Firewalls - 2/21/2002 11:31:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] SOAP and Firewalls - 2/21/2002 11:41:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] SOAP-RPC and REST and security - 2/21/2002 11:57:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] SOAP-RPC and REST and security - 2/22/2002 12:37:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] SOAP-RPC and REST and security - 2/22/2002 1:27:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] SOAP-RPC and REST and security - 2/22/2002 1:40:00 AM
The InfoApocalypse - 2/22/2002 4:28:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Scatter/gather pattern [was: New XPipe PresentationAvailable] - 2/22/2002 6:10:00 AM
How do I use my own JavaClass??? - 2/22/2002 10:04:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] How do I use my own JavaClass??? - 2/22/2002 10:48:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Scatter/gather pattern [was: New XPipe Presentation Available] - 2/22/2002 12:13:00 PM
Simplified XPointer - 2/22/2002 1:36:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Simplified XPointer - 2/22/2002 3:57:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Simplified XPointer - 2/23/2002 1:32:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Worse XML tools? - 2/22/2002 2:18:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Worse XML tools? - 2/22/2002 10:44:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Worse XML tools? - 2/22/2002 11:05:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Data-oriented XML [was: Scatter/gather pattern] - 2/22/2002 2:33:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Two sides of SOAP (was RE: [xml-dev] SOAP-RPC and R EST and security) - 2/22/2002 2:47:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Two sides of SOAP (was RE: [xml-dev] SOAP-RPC and REST and security) - 2/22/2002 5:24:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] The InfoApocalypse - 2/22/2002 2:56:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Simplified XPointer - 2/22/2002 5:03:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Two sides of SOAP (was RE: [xml-dev] SOAP-RPC and REST and security) - 2/22/2002 7:00:00 PM
XML & government in general - 2/22/2002 8:21:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] XML & government in general - 2/22/2002 9:04:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] XML & government in general - 2/22/2002 11:01:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] XML & government in general - 2/27/2002 4:31:00 PM
ANNOUNCE: SAX2 book from O'Reilly - 2/22/2002 8:22:00 PM
Re: ANNOUNCE: SAX2 book from O'Reilly - 2/24/2002 9:06:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] XML & government in general - 2/22/2002 8:44:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Worse XML tools? - 2/22/2002 10:52:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Worse XML tools? - 2/22/2002 10:53:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Worse XML tools? - 2/22/2002 11:07:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Worse XML tools? - 2/23/2002 1:39:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] 14 Theses around "Namespace Documents" - 2/22/2002 11:18:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Two sides of SOAP (was RE: [xml-dev] SOAP-RPC and REST and security) - 2/22/2002 11:19:00 PM
<?P[SV]I?> - 2/23/2002 9:17:00 AM
and schema constraints - 2/25/2002 1:22:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] and schema constraints - 2/25/2002 4:15:00 AM
Doubts relating to XML - 2/25/2002 9:12:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] Worse XML tools? - 2/25/2002 10:00:00 AM
Reminder: deadline for participation in new OASIS TCs - 2/25/2002 1:59:00 PM
Test - 2/25/2002 4:53:00 PM
XPath and performance - 2/25/2002 9:00:00 PM
DOM L3 and Type info - 2/26/2002 2:32:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] XPath and performance - 2/26/2002 3:12:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] DOM L3 and Type info - 2/26/2002 8:59:00 AM
XInclude & Document Function. - 2/26/2002 5:51:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] XInclude & Document Function. - 2/26/2002 3:49:00 PM
XML Schema - > XML Instance - > XSLT Transformation with MSXML 4 ? - 2/26/2002 9:44:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] XML Schema - > XML Instance - > XSLT Transformation with MSXML 4 ? - 2/26/2002 10:04:00 AM
unsubscibe - 2/26/2002 12:24:00 PM
New Patent Policy Draft - 2/26/2002 2:50:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] New Patent Policy Draft - 2/26/2002 3:02:00 PM
Standards: innovation, evolution, and stasis - 2/26/2002 3:01:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Standards: innovation, evolution, and stasis - 2/26/2002 5:52:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Standards: innovation, evolution, and stasis - 2/26/2002 3:08:00 PM
Evaluating RPC versus REST - 2/26/2002 3:20:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Evaluating RPC versus REST - 2/26/2002 4:02:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Evaluating RPC versus REST - 2/26/2002 7:09:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Evaluating RPC versus REST - 2/26/2002 3:39:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Evaluating RPC versus REST - 2/26/2002 6:49:00 PM
MaGIC - 2/26/2002 4:08:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Evaluating RPC versus REST - 2/26/2002 5:02:00 PM
MS thinks HTTP Needs Replacing??? - 2/26/2002 5:29:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] MS thinks HTTP Needs Replacing??? - 2/26/2002 5:34:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] MS thinks HTTP Needs Replacing??? - 2/26/2002 5:47:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] MS thinks HTTP Needs Replacing??? - 2/26/2002 6:09:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] MS thinks HTTP Needs Replacing??? - 2/27/2002 2:08:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] MS thinks HTTP Needs Replacing??? - 2/26/2002 5:46:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] MS thinks HTTP Needs Replacing??? - 2/26/2002 5:58:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] New Patent Policy Draft - 2/26/2002 5:53:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] MS thinks HTTP Needs Replacing??? - 2/26/2002 6:01:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] MS thinks HTTP Needs Replacing??? - 2/26/2002 6:17:00 PM
Re: RE: [xml-dev] MS thinks HTTP Needs Replacing??? - 2/26/2002 6:19:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] MS thinks HTTP Needs Replacing??? - 2/26/2002 7:14:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] MS thinks HTTP Needs Replacing??? - 2/26/2002 6:54:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] MS thinks HTTP Needs Replacing??? - 2/26/2002 8:05:00 PM
RE: RE: [xml-dev] MS thinks HTTP Needs Replacing??? - 2/26/2002 8:13:00 PM
Re: RE: RE: [xml-dev] MS thinks HTTP Needs Replacing??? - 2/26/2002 9:54:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] MS thinks HTTP Needs Replacing??? - 2/27/2002 2:29:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Evaluating RPC versus REST - 2/26/2002 8:29:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] MS thinks HTTP Needs Replacing??? - 2/26/2002 9:10:00 PM
Namespaces best practices - 2/26/2002 9:52:00 PM
RE: RE: RE: [xml-dev] MS thinks HTTP Needs Replacing??? - 2/26/2002 10:12:00 PM
Re: RE: RE: [xml-dev] MS thinks HTTP Needs Replacing??? - 2/27/2002 2:03:00 PM
RE: RE: RE: [xml-dev] MS thinks HTTP Needs Replacing??? - 2/26/2002 10:24:00 PM
Data Dictionary - 2/26/2002 10:51:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Evaluating RPC versus REST - 2/26/2002 11:51:00 PM
NEXTWARE Spring 2002 brochure available for download - 2/27/2002 8:45:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] Namespaces best practices - 2/27/2002 9:13:00 AM
HTTPEctomy considered bad (was RE: RE: [xml-dev] MS thinks HTTP Needs Replacing???) - 2/27/2002 9:25:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] HTTPEctomy considered bad (was RE: RE: [xml-dev] MS thinks HTTP Needs Replacing???) - 2/27/2002 11:03:00 AM
[Announce] Apache Xindice XML database 1.0rc2 Released - 2/27/2002 11:33:00 AM
repeating element names in single XML vocabulary - 2/27/2002 12:11:00 PM
Re: XML to object relational - 2/27/2002 12:37:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] HTTPEctomy considered bad (was RE: RE: [xml-dev] MS thinksHTTP Needs Replacing???) - 2/27/2002 12:41:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] MS thinks HTTP Needs Replacing??? - 2/27/2002 1:21:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] MS thinks HTTP Needs Replacing??? - 2/27/2002 1:28:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] HTTPEctomy considered bad (was RE: RE: [xml-dev] MS thinks HTTP Needs Replacing???) - 2/27/2002 3:14:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] MS thinks HTTP Needs Replacing??? - 2/27/2002 3:14:00 PM
RE: RE: RE: [xml-dev] MS thinks HTTP Needs Replacing??? - 2/27/2002 3:28:00 PM
REST as RPC done right - 2/27/2002 3:49:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] REST as RPC done right - 2/27/2002 4:31:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] REST as RPC done right - 2/27/2002 5:42:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] REST as RPC done right - 2/28/2002 8:23:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] REST as RPC done right - 2/28/2002 8:38:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] REST as RPC done right - 2/28/2002 8:49:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] REST as RPC done right - 2/28/2002 9:20:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] REST as RPC done right - 2/28/2002 11:49:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] XML & government in general - 2/27/2002 3:56:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] REST as RPC done right - 2/27/2002 4:15:00 PM
looking for existing XSL code - 2/27/2002 4:22:00 PM
ANN: Xalt Object Realizer version 1.0 - 2/27/2002 4:25:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] XML & government in general - 2/27/2002 5:02:00 PM
RE: RE: RE: [xml-dev] MS thinks HTTP Needs Replacing??? - 2/27/2002 5:15:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] MS thinks HTTP Needs Replacing??? - 2/27/2002 5:38:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] MS thinks HTTP Needs Replacing??? - 2/27/2002 8:40:00 PM
Question about the sytax of namespace declarations - 2/27/2002 8:53:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Question about the sytax of namespace declarations - 2/27/2002 9:04:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Question about the sytax of namespace declarations - 2/28/2002 2:03:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Question about the sytax of namespace declarations - 2/28/2002 6:30:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Question about the sytax of namespace declarations - 2/28/2002 6:47:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Question about the sytax of namespace declarations - 2/27/2002 9:31:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] MS thinks HTTP Needs Replacing??? - 2/27/2002 11:11:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] HTTPEctomy considered bad (was RE: RE: [xml-dev] MS thinks HTTP Needs Replacing???) - 2/27/2002 11:58:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] HTTPEctomy considered bad (was RE: RE: [xml-dev] MSthinks HTTP Needs Replacing???) - 2/28/2002 4:19:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] MS thinks HTTP Needs Replacing??? - 2/28/2002 12:51:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] MS thinks HTTP Needs Replacing??? - 2/28/2002 2:22:00 PM
Image (bitmap) in XML document - 2/28/2002 2:26:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] Image (bitmap) in XML document - 2/28/2002 2:38:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] MS thinks HTTP Needs Replacing??? - 2/28/2002 4:28:00 AM
Simple xpath software request - 2/28/2002 4:56:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] Simple xpath software request - 2/28/2002 4:59:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Simple xpath software request - 2/28/2002 9:58:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] Simple xpath software request - 2/28/2002 11:22:00 PM
Either ... or ... in Schema - 2/28/2002 5:39:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] Either ... or ... in Schema - 2/28/2002 6:13:00 AM
RE: [xml-dev] Simple xpath software request - 2/28/2002 8:07:00 AM
Re: [xml-dev] MS thinks HTTP Needs Replacing??? - 2/28/2002 2:03:00 PM
Fwd: Linkage of GPLed GCC to Closed Source via XML or Perl - 2/28/2002 2:22:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] MS thinks HTTP Needs Replacing??? - 2/28/2002 3:09:00 PM
Use of CONOPS in Sharable Service Contracts (WAS RE: [xml-dev] MS thinks HTTP Needs Replacing???) - 2/28/2002 3:30:00 PM
updated xmlns media feature - 2/28/2002 7:57:00 PM
Call For Papers: ebXML track at XML Europe 2002 - 2/28/2002 8:26:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] REST as RPC done right - 2/28/2002 9:01:00 PM
Re: [xml-dev] REST as RPC done right - 2/28/2002 9:38:00 PM
xml/XSL and javascript form issue - 2/28/2002 9:06:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] REST as RPC done right - 2/28/2002 9:51:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Simple xpath software request - 2/28/2002 11:20:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] Fwd: Linkage of GPLed GCC to Closed Source via XML or Perl - 2/28/2002 11:23:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] HTTPEctomy considered bad (was RE: RE: [xml-dev] MS thinks HTTP Needs Replacing???) - 2/28/2002 11:43:00 PM
Check out the pipeline submission - 2/28/2002 11:45:00 PM
RE: [xml-dev] HTTPEctomy considered bad (was RE: RE: [xml-dev] MSthinks HTTP Needs Replacing???) - 2/28/2002 11:58:00 PM

Disclaimer

These Archives are provided for informational purposes only and have been generated directly from the Altova mailing list archive system and are comprised of the lists set forth on www.altova.com/list/index.html. Therefore, Altova does not warrant or guarantee the accuracy, reliability, completeness, usefulness, non-infringement of intellectual property rights, or quality of any content on the Altova Mailing List Archive(s), regardless of who originates that content. You expressly understand and agree that you bear all risks associated with using or relying on that content. Altova will not be liable or responsible in any way for any content posted including, but not limited to, any errors or omissions in content, or for any losses or damage of any kind incurred as a result of the use of or reliance on any content. This disclaimer and limitation on liability is in addition to the disclaimers and limitations contained in the Website Terms of Use and elsewhere on the site.