Altova Mailing List Archives
>xml-dev Archive Home
>Thread Prev -
>Thread Next - RE: Why XML Schema enforces UPA (was Re: a or b or both - mystery ..)
RE: Why XML Schema enforces UPA (was Re: a or b or both - mystery ..)
To: Murali Mani <mani@--.----.--->, xml-dev@-----.---.---
Date: 4/18/2001 10:01:00 AM
I think Henry is right similar to the way the Grove guys were right. It converges in the InfoSet, the immutable definitions not subject to transform. The problem is well-formedness itself opening up any artifact created at that layer to transformation. Off list, Leigh Dodds and I were discussing this. It seems we need as has been stated by many, infoSet properties that can be created by different means of which XML Schema is one. A binary is yet another transport format and does not solve the essential problem of an immutable definition. Len http://www.mp3.com/LenBullard Ekam sat.h, Vipraah bahudhaa vadanti. Daamyata. Datta. Dayadhvam.h -----Original Message----- From: Murali Mani [mailto:mani@C...] Thinking about this a little more -- It is unclear where the convergence of schema languages will be -- i think it mostly will be that there will be these 2 classes of schema languages -- one defined by XML Schema and other defined by RELAX and TREX.