Altova Mailing List Archives
>xml-dev Archive Home
>Thread Prev - Standard way to express object, not resource, rels in XML?
Re: Standard way to express object, not resource, rels in XML?
To: Mike Brown <mbrown@----.----.--->
Date: 8/21/2000 5:29:00 AM
Mike Brown wrote: > > (...) However, I am not interested in saying "doc1.xml is related > to doc2.xml". Rather, I want to say "object foo1 (the thing doc1.xml's data > describes) is related to object foo2 (the thing doc2.xml's data describes)". > I do not want to refer to doc1.xml or doc2.xml at all when expressing this > relationship; I want to refer to only the foo1 and foo2 identifiers. > > RDF seems to be concerned with metadata like this, but a cursory inspection > of what RDF covers made it look like it, too, was more concerned with > "resources" like documents. Did you already take a look at the SOAP serialization format (SOAP spec, chapter five, http://www.w3.org/TR/SOAP/)? If your data is object oriented, this may be an approach more suitable than RDF. Since RDF is more property centric than object oriented, mapping object definitions to an RDF schema is a bit difficult. Best, Stefan -- Stefan Haustein Univ. Dortmund, FB 4, LS 8 tel: +49 231 755 2499 Baroper Str. 301 fax: +49 231 755 5105 D-44221 Dortmund (Germany) www-ai.cs.uni-dortmund.de