Altova Mailing List Archives>Archive Index >microsoft.public.xsl Archive Home >Recent entries >Thread Prev - Re: Reinventing XAML? >Thread Next - Re: Reinventing XAML? Re: Reinventing XAML?To: NULL Date: 9/6/2008 9:57:00 PM > I just looked at the saxon page and discovered that they want 250 pounds! Such a search is far from perfect :) The basic version of Saxon (free and open source) is what most people use. Cheers, Dimitre Novatchev "Siegfried Heintze" <siegfried@h...> wrote in message news:uHjsHPEEJHA.612@T...... >> It would be a lot easier in XSLT 2.0 which has better string handling >> though, in version 1.0 you'd need extension functions which can be >> written in a number of languages depending on which processor you choose. >> The main contender for a version 2.0 processor is probably Saxon which >> can run on Java or .NET. > > I just looked at the saxon page and discovered that they want 250 pounds! > Are there any other options for XSLT 2? The outlook seems bleak for XSLT > according to some blogs I discovered (or was it a URL you gave me?). > Aparently Apache has no plans for XSLT2! > Siegfried > | ||||||
| Company | Legal | Press | Partners | Careers | Sitemap | Contact Us | Altova Blog | Mobile | Full Site | |||
|
