Yes, but on the other hand extension objects are called via reflection 
(they are not available at XSLT compile time hence late binding), while 
extension script once compiler is called directly and so usually run 
faster than extension objects.
So it's a trade of.

-- 
Oleg Tkachenko [XML MVP, MCPD]
http://www.tkachenko.com/blog | http://www.XmlLab.Net

Dimitre Novatchev wrote:
> The use of extension objects is recommended. Embedded scripts have to be 
> compiled dynamically into executable code and this may result in not freeing 
> their memory.
> 
> For examples see the MSDN help.
> 
> Cheers,
> Dimitre Novatchev
> "Sampat" <sampatdixit@g...> wrote in message 
> news:0b88bc88-d00b-4415-9290-2f5c4447d357@a......
>> Hi,
>>  I have a requirement where in I need to call some custom .Net method
>> from my XSLT. Just wanted to know which one performs better
>> 1. Using extension objects
>> 2. Using <msxsl:script> within xslt.
>>
>> Any inputs with some code samples would be helpful.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Sampat. 
> 
>