![]() |
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | Altova Mailing List Archives>Archive Index >microsoft.public.xsl Archive Home >Recent entries >Thread Prev - Table transformation [Thread Next] Re: Table transformationTo: NULL Date: 5/3/2004 6:55:00 PM Hi Chris, It all depends :-) If you're using a docbook-based application to manage your content and need the robustness of the CALS model for authoring/paper composition/etc. then you should stick with it. If your tables are fairly straightforward and HTML tables fit the bill, you should create your information directly in that format. Those are the only two widely-recognized, standardized table markup vocabularies that I'm aware of. A third option is to use a table/record/field type of model that explicitly describes your information. To the best of my knowledge, all of the editors that support CALS tables also support HTML tables, so if you don't need the extra overhead, that's the easiest way to go. I hope this helps, -- Mary McRae blogs: http://blogs.officezealot.com/mary web: http://www.office-xml.com | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
| Company | Legal | Press | Partners | Careers | Sitemap | Contact Us | Altova Blog | |||||
|
