Altova Mailing List Archives>Archive Index >microsoft.public.xml Archive Home >Recent entries >Thread Prev - Re: Error message concerning msxml3r.dll during installation of Microsoft software [Thread Next] Re: Error message concerning msxml3r.dll during installation of Microsoft softwareTo: NULL Date: 6/11/2009 3:51:00 PM "Michael Portner" <pisaura@f...> wrote in message news:79brlcF1pjj3aU1@m...... > > "Robert Aldwinckle" <robald@t...> wrote: > >>> But I tried to install the application in Windows Server 2003. >>> Unfortunately the error concerning msxml3r.dll during installation >>> occured again, but the application is running without errors. >> >> >> Sure. All you should need to do is reboot. >> The blocked module gets copied into a temporay location >> then listed in PendingFileRenameOperations, then later >> renamed properly during a boot when nothing should be >> interfering with that operation. > > I'm aware of the PendingFileRenameOperations mechanism. Actually > even after a reboot the DLL is still the same version, size and has the > same change date. So I wonder whether there was a replacement > of the file at all. So, what you could do is *before* the boot use RegEdit to find that value and see the name of the module which should be renamed. Oh. There are two copies, one in System32 and one in dllcache. Are they both being replaced at the same time? > >>> >>> That means: I can't use the software with "Windows XP SP3" >>> as well as with "Vista Ultimate SP1" but with "Windows >>> Server 2003". >>> >>> I don't understand this but I can live with this situation. >> >> >> It wouldn't be that difficult to figure out what the messages really imply. > > Except the Operating System I used nothing has changed. > > XP and Vista: installing the application, reboot, errors concerning > frmMain.MDIForm_Load / ActiveX and Run-time error '91' appear. > Windows Server 2003: installing the application, reboot and no > errors appear. Having two cases to trace would make the analysis of both traces much simpler. All you would need to consider would be significant differences, without necessarily understanding what any of it actually meant. ; ) But first I would try using ProcExp to find out what proceses are using that module and which ones I could do without. Again, having two cases would mean that you could compare lists and then focus only on the differences between them. Good luck Robert --- | ||||||
| Company | Legal | Press | Partners | Careers | Sitemap | Contact Us | Altova Blog | Mobile | Full Site | |||
|
