Yes, that is a strategy in general --but-- my objective is to make the raw 
XML available as the "free" results of a SaaS I am working on. I've resorted 
to the following comment in each file:

<!--
NOTES:
   1.) File Save menu -or- View Source "must" be used to copy
       "all" XML which browsers may not display in new windows.
   2.) W3C Official Feed Validation Service
       http://validator.w3c.org/feed/
-->



"Joe Fawcett" <joefawcett@n...> wrote in message 
news:ekRbpCWSJHA.1164@T......
> You can always add a stylesheet reference to the XML if you want it styled 
> differently. The identity transform would give a rough approximation of 
> the raw XML.
>
> -- 
>
> Joe Fawcett (MVP - XML)
>
> http://joe.fawcett.name
>
> "Hillbilly" <somebody@s...> wrote in message 
> news:%23PbM1hNSJHA.5056@T......
>> <sigh> ;-)
>>
>> Furthermore, copy and paste from view source loses the formatting which 
>> is retained
>> "Martin Honnen" <mahotrash@y...> wrote in message 
>> news:erYACyMSJHA.4916@T......
>>> Hillbilly wrote:
>>>
>>>> Did you know Firefox will not display raw XML (the entire collection of 
>>>> nodes) in the same way IE will and does?
>>>
>>> Well both IE and Firefox have it flaws when they try to pretty-print XML 
>>> documents. I prefer view source to see the raw XML.
>>>
>>> -- 
>>>
>>> Martin Honnen --- MVP XML
>>> http://JavaScript.FAQTs.com/
>>
>
>