"TOUDIdel" <toudidel@o...> wrote in message 
news:#wIAyR6tIHA.5268@T......
>
> U¿ytkownik "TOUDIdel" <toudidel@o...> napisa³ w wiadomo¶ci 
> news:%230ccn$5tIHA.4560@T......
>>I define element wihout certaint type declaration (there aren't type 
>>attribute, complex or simple type child):
>> e.g.
>>        <xs:element name="invoice"/>
>> MSXML doesn't report any errors when that element contains some text 
>> content.
>> I believe to MSXML but I cant find in specification why is it possible 
>> and correct?
>
>
> http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlschema-1/#declare-element
>
> "An <element> with no referenced or included type definition will 
> correspond to an element declaration which has the same type definition as 
> the head of its substitution group if it identifies one, otherwise the 
> .ur-type definition.. This has the important consequence that the minimum 
> valid element declaration, that is, one with only a name attribute and no 
> contents, is also (nearly) the most general, validating any combination of 
> text and element content and allowing any attributes, and providing for 
> recursive validation where possible."
>
> Does it explains an issue?
> -- 
> td
>
Seems to explain it.

-- 

Joe Fawcett (MVP - XML)
http://joe.fawcett.name