Home. 
.

transparent

transparent

transparent

Altova Mailing List Archives


Re: Problem using msxml

From: "Marrow" <m--a-r-r-o-w@--------------------.--->
To: NULL
Date: 9/8/2004 5:27:00 PM
Hi Neil,

There's usually lots of things you can do to speed up those troublesome
stylesheets - some is by trial and error, some are by trading off code
elegance for performance, some are based on advanced techniques (such as
divide and conquer for recursions) and some are commonly/not-so-commonly
known best-practices.  It depends how far you are willing to go ;)  If
someone buys me a 34-hour day for Christmas I'll be happy to jot down all
the ones I know of! :)

Cheers
Marrow

"Neil Smith [MVP Digital Media]" <neil@n...> wrote in message
news:6h8uj09d2533190aal5gk7ab7m1u65jr4q@4......
> Thanks, I'll try that out on some 'problem' transforms ;-)
>
> On Wed, 8 Sep 2004 15:13:02 +0100, "Marrow"
> <m--a-r-r-o-w@m-a-r-r-o-w--s-o-f-t.com> wrote:
>
> >Hi Neil,
> >
> >You generally find that, ascross transformation engines, explicitly
> >'casting' types yields between none and some performance improvement ;).
> >With MS's transformation engines you tend to see the best performance
hike
> >for these subtle changes - my guess would be the way they internally
deduce
> >data types before deciding whether a conversion is needed.
> >
> >Of course, there are times in XSLT when explicitly casting is an absolute
> >must in order to get the desired result - the one example that always
> >springs to mind is index predicates, e.g. the possible difference in
results
> >between...
> >
> ><xsl:variable name="index" select="1"/>
> ><xsl:value-of select="count(foo[$index])"/>
> >
> >and...
> >
> ><xsl:variable name="index">1</xsl:variable>
> ><xsl:value-of select="count(foo[$index])"/>
> >
> >Cheers
> >Marrow
> >
> >
> >"Neil Smith [MVP Digital Media]" <neil@n...> wrote in message
> >news:nootj01v43b99su91s2dfttvpgo1ldhdit@4......
> >> Thats a curious result, Marrow - are you saying that explicity telling
> >> the MSXML parser to 'type' the data gives a performance improvement
> >> over letting it implicitly determine the data type, in this case ?
> >>
> >> I wonder, is this a general method for improving  XSLT parse
> >> performance, or is it specific to MSXML ?
> >>
> >> Cheers - Neil
> >>
> >> On Wed, 8 Sep 2004 10:38:26 +0100, "Marrow"
> >> <m--a-r-r-o-w@m-a-r-r-o-w--s-o-f-t.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> >Hi Darren,
> >> >
> >> >I think you might be surprised at the performance 'difference'...
> >> >
> >> >If you tweak the code I gave by replacing...
> >> >   <xsl:param name="n" select="."/>
> >> >with...
> >> >   <xsl:param name="n" select="string(.)"/>
> >> >and replace...
> >> >      <xsl:variable name="nv" select="substring-before($n,'E')"/>
> >> >with...
> >> >      <xsl:variable name="nv"
select="number(substring-before($n,'E'))"/>
> >> >
> >> >that should speed it up.
> >> >
> >> >Compared with using msxsl:number() on MSXML 4.0 over a sample of your
> >data
> >> >repeated 20,000 times - I am seeing almost identical times (averaged
out
> >on
> >> >one of my machines at:- template method = 173.8ms; msxsl:number()
method
> >=
> >> >173.2ms).
> >> >
> >> >Of course, be aware that msxsl:number() is not consistently supported
> >even
> >> >as an MS extension (it isn't supported in MSXML 3.0).
> >> >
> >> >Cheers
> >> >Marrow
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >"darren@w..." <darrenworkcom@d...> wrote in
> >message
> >> >news:6EED1412-0908-4AAE-A9A6-8943ECAFF88D@m......
> >> >> Thanks for the reply,  I have actually gone with Joe's solution
above,
> >as
> >> >our
> >> >> datafiles can be quite large, and  predominantly numbers.  I there
> >suspect
> >> >> the petrformance of further template calls (especially the number
that
> >> >would
> >> >> be required) if a function is available.
> >> >>
> >> >> Thanks for the post,
> >> >>
> >> >> Hugh
> >> >>
> >> >> "Marrow" wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> > Hi Darren,
> >> >> >
> >> >> > You could write a template to handle exponential notation numbers,
> >> >something
> >> >> > like...
> >> >> >
> >> >> > <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
> >> >> > <xsl:stylesheet version="1.0"
> >> >> > xmlns:xsl="http://www.w3.org/1999/XSL/Transform"
> >> >> > xmlns:fo="http://www.w3.org/1999/XSL/Format">
> >> >> >
> >> >> > <xsl:template match="stuff">
> >> >> >   <xsl:text>Value: </xsl:text>
> >> >> >   <xsl:call-template name="exnumber"/>
> >> >> >   <xsl:text>
> >> >> </xsl:text>
> >> >> > </xsl:template>
> >> >> >
> >> >> > <xsl:template name="exnumber">
> >> >> >   <xsl:param name="n" select="."/>
> >> >> >   <xsl:choose>
> >> >> >     <xsl:when test="contains($n,'E')">
> >> >> >       <xsl:variable name="nv" select="substring-before($n,'E')"/>
> >> >> >       <xsl:variable name="nexp" select="substring-after($n,'E')"/>
> >> >> >       <xsl:variable name="exp"
> >> >> >
> >>
>
>>select="substring('1000000000000000000000000000000',1,translate($nexp,'-',
'
> >'
> >> >> > )+1)"/>
> >> >> >       <xsl:choose>
> >> >> >         <xsl:when test="$nexp >= 0">
> >> >> >           <xsl:value-of select="$nv * $exp"/>
> >> >> >         </xsl:when>
> >> >> >         <xsl:otherwise>
> >> >> >           <xsl:value-of select="$nv div $exp"/>
> >> >> >         </xsl:otherwise>
> >> >> >       </xsl:choose>
> >> >> >     </xsl:when>
> >> >> >     <xsl:otherwise>
> >> >> >       <xsl:value-of select="$n"/>
> >> >> >     </xsl:otherwise>
> >> >> >   </xsl:choose>
> >> >> > </xsl:template>
> >> >> > </xsl:stylesheet>
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> > HTH
> >> >> > Marrow
> >> >> > http://www.marrowsoft.com - home of Xselerator (XSLT IDE and
> >debugger)
> >> >> > http://www.topxml.com/Xselerator
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> > "darren@w..." <darren@w...@discussions.microsoft.com>
wrote
> >in
> >> >> > message news:B41E4F0B-C97F-452F-8220-1326DE921065@m......
> >> >> > > I have an xml file:
> >> >> > > <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
> >> >> > > <myspace>
> >> >> > > <stuff>5.6</stuff>
> >> >> > > <stuff>1.27E-2</stuff>
> >> >> > > </myspace>
> >> >> > >
> >> >> > > I have a stylesheet:
> >> >> > > <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
> >> >> > > <xsl:stylesheet version="1.0"
> >> >> > > xmlns:xsl="http://www.w3.org/1999/XSL/Transform"
> >> >> > > xmlns:fo="http://www.w3.org/1999/XSL/Format">
> >> >> > >
> >> >> > > <xsl:template match=".//stuff">
> >> >> > > Value: <xsl:value-of select="number(.)"/>
> >> >> > > </xsl:template>
> >> >> > >
> >> >> > > </xsl:stylesheet>
> >> >> > >
> >> >> > >
> >> >> > > I expect the results:
> >> >> > > <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
> >> >> > > Value: 5.6
> >> >> > > Value: 0.0127
> >> >> > >
> >> >> > > The results I get:
> >> >> > > <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-16"?>
> >> >> > > Value: 5.6
> >> >> > > Value: NaN
> >> >> > >
> >> >> > > The parser doesn't seem to support  exponential notation for
> >numbers!
> >> >> > > Is this true, or am I doing something wrong?
> >> >> > > Is there a work around, as I have a lot of  data from excel
> >> >spreadsheets
> >> >> > > that use this notation, and my style sheets are not working well
> >with
> >> >> > it!!!
> >> >> > >
> >> >> > >
> >> >> > > Hugh
> >> >> > >
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >
> >>
> >
>




transparent
Print
Mail
Digg
delicious
Disclaimer
.

These Archives are provided for informational purposes only and have been generated directly from the Altova mailing list archive system and are comprised of the lists set forth on www.altova.com/list/index.html. Therefore, Altova does not warrant or guarantee the accuracy, reliability, completeness, usefulness, non-infringement of intellectual property rights, or quality of any content on the Altova Mailing List Archive(s), regardless of who originates that content. You expressly understand and agree that you bear all risks associated with using or relying on that content. Altova will not be liable or responsible in any way for any content posted including, but not limited to, any errors or omissions in content, or for any losses or damage of any kind incurred as a result of the use of or reliance on any content. This disclaimer and limitation on liability is in addition to the disclaimers and limitations contained in the Website Terms of Use and elsewhere on the site.

.
.

transparent

transparent