On Jun 3, 4:55=A0pm, Jorge <jo...@jorgechamorro.com> wrote:
> On Jun 3, 3:00=A0am, RobG <robg...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > (...)
> > In any case, if you think an item on JSON is required, write one and
> > post it here for review and possible inclusion in the FAQ.
>
> Again ? Ok, here it goes:
>
> On Jun 1, 12:01 pm, Jorge <jo...@jorgechamorro.com> wrote:
>
> > -----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > =A0FAQ Topic - What online resources are available?
> > -----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> >http://crockford.com/javascript/
>
> > JSON:http://www.JSON.org/

That is not a suitable FAQ entry. Would you be happy if the entire FAQ
was reduced to links to ECMA-262 and the W3C DOM pages?


> > JSLINT:http://www.JSLint.com/
> > JSMIN:http://javascript.crockford.com/jsmin.html
> > JSMIN:http://fmarcia.info/jsmin/test.html
> > (...)

Perhaps you would.  The above links have nothing to do with JSON, why
would that be part of a JSON FAQ entry?

Firstly you have to work out what the question is - since there aren't
any asked here specifically about JSON, you'll have to make one up.
The answer should briefly explain what JSON is and how to use it.
Lastly, include a link to json.org.  Perhaps you could also write a
longer article that could be linked to the notes pages and shows how
to use JSON in an XMLHttpRequest response.

If you aren't prepared to do that, there likely won't be a JSON entry
as there seems to be little enthusiasm to answer a question that no
one has asked.


--
Rob