Altova Mailing List Archives>Archive Index >comp.text.xml Archive Home >Recent entries >Thread Prev - Re: XML naming conventions and good practice [Thread Next] Re: XML naming conventions and good practiceTo: NULL Date: 5/16/2009 11:13:00 AM In news:0025ac7c-b190-4581-921f-c165bb6c28e2@t..., JimboCat <103134.3516@c...> typed: > On May 15, 4:17 pm, Joe Kesselman <keshlam.cat.nos...@verizon.net> > wrote: >>> My main gripe against XML is that it's so verbose. In this >>> particular application, tags and antitags take up more than ten >>> times as much space as the actual data being sent. CSV was *so* >>> much more compact. >> >> XML's verbosity is part of what's made it rapidly accepted -- it's >> easy to debug. >> >> On the other hand, XML has never claimed to be the right answer for >> all tasks. > > Microsoft, on the other hand, has effectively claimed so. Well, maybe > not *all* tasks. But my new computer at work has Office 2007. Not only > do I hate the new user-interfaces, but it turns out the new file > format is . . . > > wait for it . . . > > a zip file full of XML docs. > > Features were lost in the transformation. At least I think so: with > the new user-interface I can't find half the features I used to use > daily. > Others feel the same. If you are that bothered, you may be interested in: http://www.addintools.com/english/menuword/ -- Ray UK | ||||||
| Company | Legal | Press | Partners | Careers | Sitemap | Contact Us | Altova Blog | Mobile | Full Site | |||
|
