Altova Mailing List Archives>Archive Index >comp.text.xml Archive Home >Recent entries >Thread Prev - Re: XML naming conventions and good practice >Thread Next - Re: XML naming conventions and good practice Re: XML naming conventions and good practiceTo: NULL Date: 5/15/2009 8:18:00 PM > My main gripe against XML is that it's so verbose. In this particular > application, tags and antitags take up more than ten times as much space as > the actual data being sent. CSV was *so* much more compact. XML's verbosity is part of what's made it rapidly accepted -- it's easy to debug. On the other hand, XML has never claimed to be the right answer for all tasks. If CSV is right for your needs, by all means use CSV. Or use whatever representation you like internally, with an export/import tool that converts between your representation an XML for interchange with others. On the other other hand, XML typically compresses magnificently, and a compressed XML file may take no more space than the compressed CSV file would have. | ||||||
| Company | Legal | Press | Partners | Careers | Sitemap | Contact Us | Altova Blog | Mobile | Full Site | |||
|
