Altova Mailing List Archives>Archive Index >comp.text.xml Archive Home >Recent entries >Thread Prev - Re: XML naming conventions and good practice >Thread Next - Re: XML naming conventions and good practice Re: XML naming conventions and good practiceTo: NULL Date: 5/11/2009 3:17:00 PM On Mon, 11 May 2009 12:28:13 +0100, Tom Anderson <twic@u...> wrote: >[crossposted to alt.usage.english!] > >On Sun, 10 May 2009, mat wrote: > >> Probably slightly off topic, but hopefully someone can give me some >> insight to best practice. >> My problem is I've got an element that's name is an irregular noun, >> in this case "series" >> So all the "series" elements need to be put inside another element, >> currently I'm using "seriesList" because the plural of series is >> series: >> >> <seriesList> >> <series>...</series> >> <series>...</series> >> <series>...</series> >> </seriesList> >> >> A colleague told me that this may be considered bad practice in >> naming XML elements. Is there a convention that lower-case letters should normally be used and that words should be separated with an underscore? That would mean <seriesList> would be more conventionally written as <series_list>. >> Can someone with more experience with XML let me know if my solution >> is alright? > >I can't claim a lot of experience with XML, but seriesList does look a bit >clunky. I am tempted to suggest serieses as the name of the outer element! > >Can you call series something else? There are other words that mean much >the same thing - list, sequence, succession, chain, run - all of which >have normal plurals. Or is series a word from your domain vocabulary that >can't be changed? > >tom -- Peter Duncanson, UK (in alt.usage.english) | ||||||
| Company | Legal | Press | Partners | Careers | Sitemap | Contact Us | Altova Blog | Mobile | Full Site | |||
|
