Altova Mailing List Archives>Archive Index >comp.text.xml Archive Home >Recent entries >Thread Prev - Re: XHTML & application/xml? >Thread Next - Re: XHTML & application/xml? Re: XHTML & application/xml?To: NULL Date: 1/31/2009 3:30:00 AM On Jan 23, 6:02=A0pm, Martin Honnen <mahotr...@yahoo.de> wrote: > UKuser wrote: > > Can I ask a simple (but maybe stupid) question. Why was the > > application/xhtml+xml MIME type developed and why don't you just serve > > it up as application/xml? It works in most browsers so is surely > > better than text/html. > > You first question application/xhtml+xml compared to application/xml. > Then you compare to text/html. I don't understand what you want to say. > application/xhtml+xml is for XHTML 1.x documents, text/html for HTML > documents and for XHTML 1.0 documents following thehttp://www.w3.org/TR/x= html1/#guidelinesguidelines. > Seehttp://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml-media-types/ > > And IE 6/7 do not support rendering XHTML documents served as > application/xml, they simply display the document tree. > > -- > > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 Martin Honnen > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0http://JavaScript.FAQTs.com/ What i mean is - if XHTML is XML why did they need a new media type? | ||||||
| Company | Legal | Press | Partners | Careers | Sitemap | Contact Us | Altova Blog | Mobile | Full Site | |||
|
