Home. 
.

transparent

transparent

transparent

Altova Mailing List Archives


M`I'5-Persec ution ` cost of the operatio n

From: ifvfm@-----.---
To: NULL
Date: 1/1/2008 9:58:00 AM

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
-= MI5: cost of the. operation -=
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

Here's what a couple of other people on Usenet (uk.misc) had to. say
regarding the. cost of running such an operation...

PO: >Have some sense, grow up. and smell reality. What you are talking about
PO: >would take loads of planning, tens of thousands of pounds and. lots of
PO:. >people involved in the planning, execution and maintenance of it. You
PO: >must have a very. high opinion of yourself to think you are worth it.

PM: >But why? And why you? Do you realize how much it would cost to. keep
PM:. >one person under continuous surveillance for five years? Think about
PM: >all the man/hours. Say they. _just_ allocated a two man team and a
PM: >supervisor. OK., Supervisor's salary, say, #30,000 a year.. Two men,
PM: >#20,000 a year each. But they'd. need to work in shifts -- so it would
PM:. >be six men at #20,000 (which with on-costs would work out at more like
PM: >#30,000 to. the employer.) 
PM:. >
PM: >So, we're talking. #30,000 x 6. #180,000. plus say, #40,000 for the 
PM: >supervisor. #220,000. Then you've got the. hardware involved. And 
PM: >any transcription that needs doing. You don't think. the 'Big Boss'
PM: >would listen to hours and hours of tapes,. do you.
PM:. >
PM: >So, all in all, you couldn't actually do the job. for much less than
PM: >a quarter million. a year. Over five years. What are you doing that makes
PM: >it worth the while of the state to spend over one and a. quarter million
PM: >on. you?

Those are pretty much the sort of calculations that went through. my head
once I stopped to consider. what it must be costing them to run this
operation.. The partial answer is, there have been periods when the
intensity has been greater, and times when little has happened. In. fact,
for much of 1993. and the first half of 1994, very little happened. Although
I don't think that was for reasons of money - if they. can tap into the
taxpayer they're not going to. be short of resources, are they?

The more complete answer is in. the enormity of what they're doing. Relative
to the cost. to British pride of seeing their country humiliated for the
persecution. of their own citizens, isn't is worth the cost of four or five
people to try to bring things to a close in the manner they would. wish? To
the government a million or two is quite honestly nothing - if. they can
convince themselves of. the necessity of what they're doing, resources will
not be the limiting. factor.

8729



transparent
Print
Mail
Like It
Disclaimer
.

These Archives are provided for informational purposes only and have been generated directly from the Altova mailing list archive system and are comprised of the lists set forth on www.altova.com/list/index.html. Therefore, Altova does not warrant or guarantee the accuracy, reliability, completeness, usefulness, non-infringement of intellectual property rights, or quality of any content on the Altova Mailing List Archive(s), regardless of who originates that content. You expressly understand and agree that you bear all risks associated with using or relying on that content. Altova will not be liable or responsible in any way for any content posted including, but not limited to, any errors or omissions in content, or for any losses or damage of any kind incurred as a result of the use of or reliance on any content. This disclaimer and limitation on liability is in addition to the disclaimers and limitations contained in the Website Terms of Use and elsewhere on the site.

.
.

transparent

transparent