Boris Kolpackov wrote:
> Hi Matthew,
> 
> Matthew Harrison <m.harrisson@c...> writes:
> 
>> Conversation (attr:Reference)
>> --> Identity (1)
>>      --> Id
>>      --> Client
>> --> Sequence (atrr:Index) (1..n)
>>      --> Sender
>>      --> Timestamp
> 
> This can be interpreted in many different ways. Shows us the XML
> documents that correspond to BlahConversation and Conversation.
> 
> -boris
> 

Conversation would never have a document defined against it (it's an 
abstract 'class'):

However, here is two sample XML documents which are descendants, I want 
them both to adhere to the Conversation schema in addition having 
further definitions in either the Identity or Sequence sections, or 
both. For example the MsgConversation has a MsgText, the 
BlahConversation has a BlahInfo.

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<MsgConversation Reference="AAAA1234567890">
	<Idenity>
		<Id>0</Id>
		<Remote>AA40019</Remote>
		<Client>47</Client>
		<Module>Msg</Module>
	</Idenity>
	<Sequence Index="1">
		<Sender>remote</Sender>
		<TimeStamp>2001-12-17T09:30:47.0Z</TimeStamp>
                 <MsgText>Blah Blah Blah</MsgText>
	</Sequence>
	<Sequence Index="2">
		<Sender>client</Sender>
		<TimeStamp>2001-12-17T09:30:47.0Z</TimeStamp>
                 <MsgText>Blah Blah Blah</MsgText>
	</Sequence>
</MsgConversation>



<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<BlahConversation Reference="AAAA1234567892">
	<Idenity>
		<Id>0</Id>
		<Remote>AA40029</Remote>
		<Client>44</Client>
		<Module>Blah</Module>
	</Idenity>
	<Sequence Index="1">
		<Sender>remote</Sender>
		<TimeStamp>2001-12-17T09:30:47.0Z</TimeStamp>
                 <BlahInfo>01100010</BlahInfo>
	</Sequence>
	<Sequence Index="2">
		<Sender>client</Sender>
		<TimeStamp>2001-12-17T09:30:47.0Z</TimeStamp>
                 <BlahInfo>01101011</BlahInfo>
	</Sequence>
</BlahConversation>




-- 
Pinging self [127.0.0.1] with 32 bites of banana cake:

Ping statistics for 127.0.0.1:
     Slices: Sent = 4, Received = 0, Lost = 4 (100% loss),