Altova Mailing List Archives>Archive Index >comp.text.xml Archive Home >Recent entries >Thread Prev - Re: If DTD is unspecifed XML should not parse >Thread Next - Re: If DTD is unspecifed XML should not parse Re: If DTD is unspecifed XML should not parseTo: NULL Date: 8/3/2007 11:22:00 PM In article <es6dnZ0Ow9XCKi7bnZ2dnUVZ8s-qnZ2d@b...>, RedGrittyBrick <RedGrittyBrick@S...> wrote: >Just because an XML document lacks a DTD doesn't mean it is invalid does >it? It might conform to an external XSD schema or external DTD? The word "valid" is used in various ways, but the XML spec use it to mean valid with respect to the DTD referred to in the document. If it doesn't refer to a DTD, it's invalid. -- Richard -- "Consideration shall be given to the need for as many as 32 characters in some alphabets" - X3.4, 1963. | ||||||
| Company | Legal | Press | Partners | Careers | Sitemap | Contact Us | Altova Blog | Mobile | Full Site | |||
|
