Home. 
.

transparent

transparent

transparent

Altova Mailing List Archives


Re: If DTD is unspecifed XML should not parse

From: RedGrittyBrick <RedGrittyBrick@---------.--->
To: NULL
Date: 8/4/2007 12:17:00 AM

Richard Tobin wrote:
> In article <-tidnfRJBenfiizbnZ2dnUVZ_tmhnZ2d@c...>,
> Joe Kesselman  <keshlam-nospam@c...> wrote:
> 
>>> I have a question regarding DTD and XML, is there any way to stop the
>>> parser in parsing the XML file if the DTD is not specified in the
>>> Doctype of the XML file and also throw an error ? I am using java by
>>> the way any help is greatly appreciated.
> 
>> If the DTD is not specified by the document type, validation is not 
>> performed and parsing runs normally.
> 
> But presumably the "invalid" indicator will be set (whatever that is
> for the parser in question), so if you want to reject invalid documents
> are well as ones without a DTD you can use that.
> 

Just because an XML document lacks a DTD doesn't mean it is invalid does 
it? It might conform to an external XSD schema or external DTD?


transparent
Print
Mail
Like It
Disclaimer
.

These Archives are provided for informational purposes only and have been generated directly from the Altova mailing list archive system and are comprised of the lists set forth on www.altova.com/list/index.html. Therefore, Altova does not warrant or guarantee the accuracy, reliability, completeness, usefulness, non-infringement of intellectual property rights, or quality of any content on the Altova Mailing List Archive(s), regardless of who originates that content. You expressly understand and agree that you bear all risks associated with using or relying on that content. Altova will not be liable or responsible in any way for any content posted including, but not limited to, any errors or omissions in content, or for any losses or damage of any kind incurred as a result of the use of or reliance on any content. This disclaimer and limitation on liability is in addition to the disclaimers and limitations contained in the Website Terms of Use and elsewhere on the site.

.
.

transparent

transparent