![]() |
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | Altova Mailing List Archives>Archive Index >comp.text.xml Archive Home >Recent entries >Thread Prev - Re: Are there standard namespaces that don't need URIs? [Thread Next] Re: Are there standard namespaces that don't need URIs?To: NULL Date: 2/5/2007 8:52:00 AM On 3 Feb, 21:11, Grant Robertson <b...@bogus.invalid> wrote: > Thanks everyone! I always get the best, right to the point, answers in > this newsgroup. It is such a relief from trying to get any straight > answers in any Microsoft newsgroup. > > No matter how many times I go over it I keep forgetting that the prefix > is just a local shorthand within the XML document for the actual > namespace which is the URI. I see the prefix with the colon after it and > think I am seeing a namespace name. Hopefully once I learn enough to > start designing my schema and actual work with XML files more than just > looking at examples, then I will get it through my head. > > Thanks again. Hi Grant, It looks like you pretty much understand the namespace thing and just need more practice. However, just in case a alternative way of looking at it might be helpful, you might find the approach used by James Clark on the following page useful: http://www.jclark.com/xml/xmlns.htm Perhaps more for the benefit of others that happen to drift this way in future looking for answers, the most concise description of XML namespaces I've found so far is: http://atmanes.blogspot.com/2006/07/short-explanation-of-xml-namespaces.html Cheers, Pete. -- ============================================= Pete Cordell Tech-Know-Ware Ltd for XML to C++ data binding visit http://www.tech-know-ware.com/lmx (or http://www.xml2cpp.com) ============================================= | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
| Company | Legal | Press | Partners | Careers | Sitemap | Contact Us | Altova Blog | |||||
|
