Kerrie M. Meyers wrote:

> I like to SAX more ? it's better with multiple interfaces and funcions
> to process a xml file.

You like SAX more than ... what? (and there are SAX implementations
available for PHP and for some JavaScript implementations).

> with jscript you go nowhere outof java, so why not SAX then ?

Now I'm confused.

First - why bring JScript into this? If you mean JavaScript then please note
that JScript refers to the Microsoft implementation of the language.

Second - Java? Nobody has mentioned anything relating to Java yet. The
closest that the thread has come so far is JavaScript (which has four
things in common with Java - the first four letters of its name).

> not including it is completely microsoft specific, you will never be able
> to use jscript in linux or macos.

No, but you can use JavaScript. The differences aren't really all that
significant.

> With SAX you can handle nodes tree in many ways, i don't know about PHP,
> but it seems unable to compare with SAX, and only works in some platforms. 

You can use SAX parsers from PHP. 

> Such limitations should be considered. I have been in java field for over
> 20 years, and done many industrial applications,.

Java has been around for slightly more then a decade. It isn't possible to
have been in the Java field for 20 years.

-- 
David Dorward       <http://blog.dorward.me.uk/>   <http://dorward.me.uk/>
                     Home is where the ~/.bashrc is