Altova Mailing List Archives>Archive Index >comp.text.xml Archive Home >Recent entries >Thread Prev - Re: Unqualified element in XSD definition [Thread Next] Re: Unqualified element in XSD definitionTo: NULL Date: 6/1/2006 10:30:00 PM Thanks a lot for your advices! Joe Kesselman wrote: > The purpose of namespaces is to leave room for your XML-based language > to be intermixed with other XML-based languages. Using unqualified names > increases the risk of conflicting definitions. > > Think about whether you, or your customers, will ever be in the position > of wanting to do this -- for example, embedding your documents as the > body of a SOAP message. Unless you can say "no" with absolute certainty, > you really should stick with namespace-qualified element names. > > Namespaces are a basic part of XML these days. Get used to them. > > -- > () ASCII Ribbon Campaign | Joe Kesselman > /\ Stamp out HTML e-mail! | System architexture and kinetic poetry | ||||||
| Company | Legal | Press | Partners | Careers | Sitemap | Contact Us | Altova Blog | Mobile | Full Site | |||
|
