Altova Mailing List Archives>Archive Index >comp.text.xml Archive Home >Recent entries >Thread Prev - Unqualified element in XSD definition >Thread Next - Re: Unqualified element in XSD definition Re: Unqualified element in XSD definitionTo: NULL Date: 6/1/2006 6:35:00 PM Anyone has different ideas about this? http://www.xml.com/pub/a/2001/06/06/schemasimple.html?page=2 which recommend to use "qualified" instead of "unqualified" mavis wrote: > Unqualified element in XSD definition > > For some reason, we may need to define elements in XSD to be > "unqualified". > > > According to the design patterns of XSD, it seems they do not recommend > > to define elements in this way....it seems it will influence XPATH / > XSLT, etc... > > > Anyone has any experience on this? Any problem will be caused by > unqualified elements? > > > Thanks a lot for your advices! | ||||||
| Company | Legal | Press | Partners | Careers | Sitemap | Contact Us | Altova Blog | Mobile | Full Site | |||
|
