 |
|
|
How does one progressively restrict enumerated types in Owl?
I've got an ontology of function-terms. I want to map
English-language terms (as strings) to the function terms. I want to
restrict the mapping as I go down the hierarchy. In the (very
stripped down) example, FUNCTION can map to any of the four terms, but
its sub-sub-subclass INCREASE_QUANTITY only maps to 'produce.'
FUNCTION Hierarchy MAPPED TERMS
FUNCTIONS happen | convert | produce | consume
PROCESSES convert | produce | consume
CHANGE_QUANTITY produce | consume
INCREASE_QUANTITY produce
DECREASE_QUANTITY consume
The reference at http://www.w3.org/TR/owl-ref/#EnumeratedDatatype
shows me how to enumerate the possible values for the Mapped term.
But I don't see how I can restrict it as I go down the tree.
Any ideas, suggestions?
And is comp.text.xml a good place to ask this?
Thanks
David Throop
|
|
| |
These Archives are provided for informational purposes only and have been generated directly from the Altova mailing list archive system and are comprised of the lists set forth on www.altova.com/list/index.html. Therefore, Altova does not warrant or guarantee the accuracy, reliability, completeness, usefulness, non-infringement of intellectual property rights, or quality of any content on the Altova Mailing List Archive(s), regardless of who originates that content. You expressly understand and agree that you bear all risks associated with using or relying on that content. Altova will not be liable or responsible in any way for any content posted including, but not limited to, any errors or omissions in content, or for any losses or damage of any kind incurred as a result of the use of or reliance on any content. This disclaimer and limitation on liability is in addition to the disclaimers and limitations contained in the Website Terms of Use and elsewhere on the site.
| |
| |
|
|
|
