![]() |
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | Altova Mailing List Archives>Archive Index >comp.text.xml Archive Home >Recent entries >Thread Prev - new here, xml, ebml, iff, and binary xml >Thread Next - Re: new here, xml, ebml, iff, and binary xml Re: new here, xml, ebml, iff, and binary xmlTo: NULL Date: 11/2/2004 2:22:00 AM "cr88192" <cr88192@r...> wrote in message news:<83nhd.791$7t6.292@n...>... > > Binary XML: > this has manifested itself in a few forms, one of the most popular is wbxml: > http://www.w3.org/TR/wbxml/ > which demonstrates the possibility of binary xml as a hacked together mess > and has been used in both arguments for and against binary xml. > imo, wbxml is an example of a bad approach. > > other ideas I have heard stated involve use of ASN.1 and schemas as a basis > for binary xml. however, I will argue that this line of approach likely has > a limited application domain. More information on the "ASN.1 for XML" issue can be found there: http:/:asn1.elibel.tm.fr/xml/ O. Dubuisson | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
| Company | Legal | Press | Partners | Careers | Sitemap | Contact Us | Altova Blog | |||||
|
