Altova Mailing List Archives>Archive Index >comp.text.xml Archive Home >Recent entries >Thread Prev - Re: IDL Vs WSDL ---- a comparison [Thread Next] Re: IDL Vs WSDL ---- a comparisonTo: NULL Date: 6/13/2004 12:38:00 PM Hi Alan, Try this link http://dsonline.computer.org/0210/d/wp5midd.htm regards anand Alan Walker wrote: > Steve, > > The first link you reference doesn't work: > > http://dsonline.computer.org/0210/d/w5midd.htm > "The requested object does not exist on this server. The link you followed > is either outdated, inaccurate, or the server has been instructed not to let > you have it." > > Alan. > > "Steve Vinoski" <vinoski@i...> wrote in message > news:6c2690b5.0406040633.4b838909@p...... > > Gerald Brose <gerald.brose@x...> wrote in message > news:<2i864aFji3sfU1@u...>... > > > (I would like to point out > > > Steve Vinoski's "Middleware dark matter" article to all those believing > > > that CORBA is the only true middleware around.) > > > > Thanks for the reference, Gerald. In fact, I've written a number of > > papers and articles related to this very IDL/WSDL topic. You can find > > the dark matter paper and the others here: > > > > <http://dsonline.computer.org/0210/d/w5midd.htm> > > > <http://www.iona.com/hyplan/vinoski/pdfs/IEEE-Integration_With_Web_Services. > pdf> > > > <http://www.iona.com/hyplan/vinoski/pdfs/IEEE-Web_Services_Interaction_Model > s_Part_1.pdf> > > > <http://www.iona.com/hyplan/vinoski/pdfs/IEEE-Web_Services_Interaction_Model > s_Part_2.pdf> > > <http://www.cuj.com/documents/s=7990/cujcexp1910vinoski/> > > > > I should also mention some relevant OMG work that IONA is leading at > > the moment. At the previous meeting, back at the end of April, we > > succeeded in getting the OMG to issue an RFP for a WSDL-to-C++ > > mapping: > > > > <http://www.omg.org/cgi-bin/apps/do_doc?mars/04-04-22.pdf> > > > > At the next meeting later this month, I'll be presenting a proposal > > that the OMG issue an RFP for a CORBA binding for WSDL. Most people > > associate only SOAP with WSDL, but WSDL is in fact specifically > > designed to be extended with non-SOAP bindings. Some of this is > > discussed in the second paper referenced above. > > > > At IONA we have a product called Artix that supports WSDL-based access > > for CORBA systems, MQ Series, Tuxedo, TIBCO, SOAP, J2EE. This is not a > > SOAP-to-whatever bridge, but instead supports native bindings for > > these technologies (though it can also bridge SOAP to these other > > things). The Artix WSDL CORBA binding is the one we'll submit to the > > OMG if the accept our above-mentioned proposal and issue the RFP. You > > can read more about Artix and download a free Artix developer kit > > here: > > > > <http://www.iona.com/products/artix/welcome.htm> > > > > Artix gives you the best of both worlds, in that it preserves your > > investment in CORBA, while also allowing you to marry it rather > > seamlessly and with high performance to other middleware and to web > > services. > > > > --steve | ||||||
| Company | Legal | Press | Partners | Careers | Sitemap | Contact Us | Altova Blog | Mobile | Full Site | |||
|
