Altova Mailing List Archives>Archive Index >comp.text.xml Archive Home >Recent entries >Thread Prev - Re: the future of the XSLT syntax [Thread Next] Re: the future of the XSLT syntaxTo: NULL Date: 5/28/2004 5:11:00 AM ptjm@i... (Patrick TJ McPhee) wrote in message news:<c9649m$cr0$1@n...>... > In article <c2941c69.0405271532.755fac91@p...>, > Justin Kim <ine8181@h...> wrote: > > % Personally I think it's quite useful to have an alternative syntax for > % XSLT. > > This is debatable, but irrelevant to my remarks. I'd say that it's <snip> I apologize for the confusion that I have caused. I did not mean to respond to your post directly, but rather to the original post and the people reading this thread in general. This is my fault in its entirety. (I hope this explains the irrelevance.) However, I agree on the fact that it is debatable. Otherwise we would not be posting over this issue. Are you willing to share your insights further? .J | ||||||
| Company | Legal | Press | Partners | Careers | Sitemap | Contact Us | Altova Blog | Mobile | Full Site | |||
|
