Altova Mailing List Archives>Archive Index >comp.text.xml Archive Home >Recent entries >Thread Prev - Re: the future of the XSLT syntax >Thread Next - Re: the future of the XSLT syntax Re: the future of the XSLT syntaxTo: NULL Date: 5/28/2004 3:23:00 AM In article <c2941c69.0405271532.755fac91@p...>, Justin Kim <ine8181@h...> wrote: % Personally I think it's quite useful to have an alternative syntax for % XSLT. This is debatable, but irrelevant to my remarks. I'd say that it's quite useful to have alternative transformation languages which have nothing to do with XSLT, but I'm not convinced that syntactic sugaring would help much. Maybe if James Clark did it.... % Before trash this idea as being 'completely off the mark', please % consider the following: I'm not sure about the other posters in this thread, but I have not trashed an idea. The particular proposal is hopeless to the extent that it's not worth consideration. -- Patrick TJ McPhee East York Canada ptjm@i... | ||||||
| Company | Legal | Press | Partners | Careers | Sitemap | Contact Us | Altova Blog | Mobile | Full Site | |||
|
